IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,6/10
7358
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Während sie die Auswirkungen der globalen Erwärmung auf eine Walpopulation untersuchen, entdecken Studenten auf einem Krabbenkutter und dessen Besatzung ein gefrorenes sowjetisches Spaceshut... Alles lesenWährend sie die Auswirkungen der globalen Erwärmung auf eine Walpopulation untersuchen, entdecken Studenten auf einem Krabbenkutter und dessen Besatzung ein gefrorenes sowjetisches Spaceshuttle und setzen es unbeabsichtigt frei.Während sie die Auswirkungen der globalen Erwärmung auf eine Walpopulation untersuchen, entdecken Studenten auf einem Krabbenkutter und dessen Besatzung ein gefrorenes sowjetisches Spaceshuttle und setzen es unbeabsichtigt frei.
Kamilla Bjorlin
- Svet
- (as Milla Björn)
Michel Estime
- Dock
- (as Mike Estimé)
Edwin R. Habacon
- Atka
- (as Edwin Bravo)
Kraig W. Sturtz
- Roland
- (as Kraig Sturtz)
Lev Poberesky
- Russian Voice #1
- (Synchronisation)
Alla Poberesky
- Russian Voice #2
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This is a very uneven movie.
On the one hand, it's not bad for an independent movie with a tiny budget. The settings is pretty nice and the actors are OK.
The movie is an obvious reference to "The Thing" and it uses practical effects and no CGI. And here lies the first problem: The effects aren't impressive. From a company that deals with practical effects, which has some veteran effects guys and lots of experience, I expected more. A lot more. The effects here only show how amazing Rob Bottin's work was over 30 years ago. I also expected the effects to be a lot more explicit, yet I always got the feeling they try to hide them by shaking the camera, cutting, putting something in front, etc.
The last problem has to do with direction: It's pretty obvious that this is the work of a first time director/writer - The movie is very uneven, there are good scenes and bad scenes, there are continuity problems, coverage problems, editing problems, things that simply don't connect and hard to understand what the director meant to do and also many scenes that seem to be missing a dialog.
All in all, this is a so-so movie for something independent without a budget. I expected more and I'm a bit disappointed, but I'd still think it's worth a watch, at least for the effort.
On the one hand, it's not bad for an independent movie with a tiny budget. The settings is pretty nice and the actors are OK.
The movie is an obvious reference to "The Thing" and it uses practical effects and no CGI. And here lies the first problem: The effects aren't impressive. From a company that deals with practical effects, which has some veteran effects guys and lots of experience, I expected more. A lot more. The effects here only show how amazing Rob Bottin's work was over 30 years ago. I also expected the effects to be a lot more explicit, yet I always got the feeling they try to hide them by shaking the camera, cutting, putting something in front, etc.
The last problem has to do with direction: It's pretty obvious that this is the work of a first time director/writer - The movie is very uneven, there are good scenes and bad scenes, there are continuity problems, coverage problems, editing problems, things that simply don't connect and hard to understand what the director meant to do and also many scenes that seem to be missing a dialog.
All in all, this is a so-so movie for something independent without a budget. I expected more and I'm a bit disappointed, but I'd still think it's worth a watch, at least for the effort.
Then you completely missed the point. You took this far too seriously. Appreciate the funny parts, appreciate Lance Henriksen, appreciate the practical effects, know that it's a cheesy B movie and have fun.
It's mind-boggling that people would actually take this that seriously. It's practically a comedy horror. Guys, relax.
It's mind-boggling that people would actually take this that seriously. It's practically a comedy horror. Guys, relax.
OK Not the worst movies i've ever seen, but it's by no means going to be remembered for anything special. Lance is about the only thing that holds it together, good actor, underused in my opinion, but even he struggles in the last third to hold the film together. The acting from some, is, shall we say, tired and formulaic, there are flashes from a few, but that's the thing, it's just flashes of what could have been.
So far as the story went, it was very much a "the thing" meets "Alien" meets fishermen..... A promising idea and a good story could have been told, but alas, they fall into the traps they so desperately needed to avoid for comparisons to other more polished bigger budget franchises. A bit more attention to the less is more camp, for achieving a scare where you don't have a big enough budget, would have done more for the poor poor effects and this coupled with poor acting in parts, leaves the film sagging in places where it could have been sailing high.
As i said, not the worst, but by no means the movie it could have been. i gave it a middle of the road meh! rating
So far as the story went, it was very much a "the thing" meets "Alien" meets fishermen..... A promising idea and a good story could have been told, but alas, they fall into the traps they so desperately needed to avoid for comparisons to other more polished bigger budget franchises. A bit more attention to the less is more camp, for achieving a scare where you don't have a big enough budget, would have done more for the poor poor effects and this coupled with poor acting in parts, leaves the film sagging in places where it could have been sailing high.
As i said, not the worst, but by no means the movie it could have been. i gave it a middle of the road meh! rating
A crab fishing vessel takes on board a team of conservationists, who are tracking down belugas, they discover something frozen in a block of ice, something that turns out to be a former Soviet space station.
I really wanted to enjoy this movie, I have something of a soft spot for lower budget horrors, but this just doesn't work. On paper, it sounded like fun, I'm all for that idea of a Soviet space shuttle containing something nasty.....
However, the something nasty turned out to be a bit of a poor copy of The Thing. The pink goo may have sounded like a good idea, but it just didn't work, throw in the dodgy CGI, 1980's style Russian agent and a ridiculously simplistic ending, and I'm afraid you're left with a clunker.
Some of the acting wasn't too bad, I thought Camille Balsamo did a decent job as Sadie, her boss though, that was quite something.
I couldn't sit through this one again.
4/10.
I really wanted to enjoy this movie, I have something of a soft spot for lower budget horrors, but this just doesn't work. On paper, it sounded like fun, I'm all for that idea of a Soviet space shuttle containing something nasty.....
However, the something nasty turned out to be a bit of a poor copy of The Thing. The pink goo may have sounded like a good idea, but it just didn't work, throw in the dodgy CGI, 1980's style Russian agent and a ridiculously simplistic ending, and I'm afraid you're left with a clunker.
Some of the acting wasn't too bad, I thought Camille Balsamo did a decent job as Sadie, her boss though, that was quite something.
I couldn't sit through this one again.
4/10.
With admittedly sharp visual and commitment to practical effect, Harbinger Down has heavy resemblance to The Thing. It will also be appreciated more for fans of old school sci-fi mystery, but unfortunately the effects are not effective. Often done in shaky motion or poorly lit sequences, the organism is a concept better hidden than shown in plain sight and the script is clearly not capable of delivering "feat what you cannot see" horror theme.
The crew of Harbinger finds a peculiar object near the Bering Sea. After hefty debate they decide to poke what seems to be Soviet satellite, a poorly made decision. Most of the screenplay is marred with needless arguments. The characters argue almost in every turn, from feeble matter and even down to crucial life preservation decision.
These are not the people one would want to be with in high stake situation. Cue the combative professor, finicky brunette protagonist and loud ship crews, then you'll have a story too similar to 2011 The Thing. Just like the creature it grows even more muddled the more it progresses.
Visual keeps a good direction for first half. It's clear, very vibrant and camera angle fits the claustrophobic location. However, it mindlessly turns into the dreaded shaky cam, even with found footage touch. There are a couple of good scenes in the making, but these lose thrill when exposed too many times, hence the shaky cam. The latter half uses blur cinematography and ends up contradicting its crisp build-up.
Despite the effect used, CGI or practical, the movie has to be engaging. Harbinger Down has a few glimpses of terror, but neither its effect nor story has adequate quality to keep the movie afloat.
The crew of Harbinger finds a peculiar object near the Bering Sea. After hefty debate they decide to poke what seems to be Soviet satellite, a poorly made decision. Most of the screenplay is marred with needless arguments. The characters argue almost in every turn, from feeble matter and even down to crucial life preservation decision.
These are not the people one would want to be with in high stake situation. Cue the combative professor, finicky brunette protagonist and loud ship crews, then you'll have a story too similar to 2011 The Thing. Just like the creature it grows even more muddled the more it progresses.
Visual keeps a good direction for first half. It's clear, very vibrant and camera angle fits the claustrophobic location. However, it mindlessly turns into the dreaded shaky cam, even with found footage touch. There are a couple of good scenes in the making, but these lose thrill when exposed too many times, hence the shaky cam. The latter half uses blur cinematography and ends up contradicting its crisp build-up.
Despite the effect used, CGI or practical, the movie has to be engaging. Harbinger Down has a few glimpses of terror, but neither its effect nor story has adequate quality to keep the movie afloat.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIn 2010 Amalgamated Dynamics (ADI) was hired to create the practical monster effects for the film The Thing (2011). However much to ADI's dismay, the studio had the majority of their work digitally replaced with CGI for the final cut of the film. In response to this, ADI used Kickstarter to fund this film, Harbinger Down, which features entirely practical creature effects created through the use of animatronics, prosthetic makeup, stop motion and miniature effects. There are zero computer animated monsters in this film.
- Patzer(at around 1 min) The coordinates in the opening scene, 58.122 N -178.603 W, are not in the Arctic Circle but south of it in the Bering Sea.
- VerbindungenReferenced in Skin Wars: Man vs. Machine (2015)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Harbinger Down?Powered by Alexa
- What is Harbinger Down about?
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Harbinger Down - Das Grauen lauert im Eis
- Drehorte
- Chatsworth, Kalifornien, USA(Filming City)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 61.036 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 22 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What is the Brazilian Portuguese language plot outline for Harbinger Down (2015)?
Antwort