Face to Face with Scott Peterson

Waste of time, they obviously made this documentary on the heels of Lacy's documentary on Netflix. Scott is seen smiling throughout the series smiling and very nonchalant which rubbed me the wrong way. Also, when asked who killed Lacy, he blames the two men for that one burglary that happened across the street, how convenient to blame others when reasonable doubt clearly points at Scott Peterson. Then they have a so-called journalist who thinks he's a detective and says that Scott didn't have a motive ... um hello, they forget about Amber Frei?! This so-called documentary was biased toward Scott. Then they try and say that Lacy was abducted in a van that was found burned, even though there was zero evidence of Lacy's DNA. The reach is real with one. I wish I could take back the hours I spent watching this mess. Lastly, may Scott continue to rot in prison. R.i.p Lacy and Connor.

This documentary aims to shed light on Scott Petersons potential innocence, instead it magnifies his misconduct and suspiciousness. I think about 80% of the way through the editing process the producers realise their mistake, proceeding to then throw in a ton of heavily circumstantial exculpatory evidence to try rectify their mistake and drive their point, only just missing a well executed alternative perspective, pun intended.

If this was instead a documentary to prove Scott Petersons guilt, this would be more deserving of a higher rating with respect to the attention to detail.

Couldn't help but laugh the whole way through.

Where are the probing questions for Scott? The documentary doesn't ask Scott any questions that really matter or do much to prove that he is innocent. So he says he is an a-hole big deal we know that! Why would you leave your wife on Christmas Eve and pregnant no less to go fishing? Why would you lie from beginning to end and tell people you told your wife about the affair and she was ok about it! Really? There are very things that are very similar with Laci Patterson documentary but this one is clearly slanted towards Scott and not very impartial. Scott came off just as unbelievable then and as he does now.

Heartbreaking case for the family of Laci and Conner. Life altering event for then naive Amber Frey, who is an imperfect person trying to do the right thing. Scott gives me the ick, doesn't mean he's guilty, although a lot of circumstantial evidence points towards his guilt. While Mr. Peterson is an adulterer, this does not mean he murdered anyone. Logically, it was a case built on circumstantial evidence. This documentary does reflect the possibility of reasonable doubt in Peterson's conviction and trial by media; however, it ends without a conclusion to the DNA testing as requested by the LA innocence project as pending. While the decision to take Mr Peterson off Death Row appears legally valid as the conviction was based on circumstantial evidence, will be curious what the DNA testing will show. I also find it interesting so many of the DNA requests were denied and who isn't curious about the burnt out van, so there is culpability on behalf of the prosecution as well. Mixed feelings on this, agree with overturning the death penalty, but unlike the Netflix documentary that was released days before, there is no input from the friends and family of the victims. Just Scott, still sending out the ick vibes.

There have been multiple documentaries about this case, and this one doesn't tell us anything new just because Scott speaks. I don't see a man broken because he was falsely convicted, I see someone who thinks that he's served enough time and wants another chance at life.

He offers no explanation of why he drove 90 miles to go fishing on a day that was too cold and wet to play golf.

He demonstrates no discernible distress at the loss of Laci, or that of his child.

He still comes across as disingenuous and self-focused. He doesn't seem concerned with finding the 'real' killer/s, just in convincing the audience that he had nothing to do with the deaths.

He calls Amber a liar, and claims that he made no promises about their relationship and future despite recordings implying a commitment.

The dedication of his sister-in-law beggars belief. She supports his innocence with a conviction that is bordering on unsettling.

I still feel that Scott Peterson is where he belongs and that he should die in jail.