IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,5/10
1324
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Hellbender dreht sich um ein amerikanisch geführtes Fracking-Team, das einen lebenden französischen Soldaten entdeckt, der in der Zeit eines napoleonischen Feldzugs eingefroren wurde.Hellbender dreht sich um ein amerikanisch geführtes Fracking-Team, das einen lebenden französischen Soldaten entdeckt, der in der Zeit eines napoleonischen Feldzugs eingefroren wurde.Hellbender dreht sich um ein amerikanisch geführtes Fracking-Team, das einen lebenden französischen Soldaten entdeckt, der in der Zeit eines napoleonischen Feldzugs eingefroren wurde.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Marko Filipovic
- French Soldier
- (as Marko Filipović)
Olivera Perunicic
- Sofija
- (as Olivera Peruničić)
Aleksandar Trmcic
- Nikola
- (as Aleksandar Trmčić)
Petar Arsic
- Danko
- (as Petar Arsić)
Janko Radisic
- Bosko
- (as Janko Radišić)
Marko Vuckovic
- Luka
- (as Marko Vučković)
Joana Knezevic
- Mickey
- (as Joana Knežević)
Ivan Djordjevic
- Ivan
- (as Ivan Đorđević)
Fedor Djorovic
- Petar
- (as Fedor Đorović)
Marina Gunjaca
- Roma Woman
- (as Marina Gunjača)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I'd only seen one other film from these creators before (that being Hellbender), which struck me as an attempt at a folk horror / coming of age story with nice cinematography but not much substance. Hell Hole continues the tradition with terrible generic dialogue, but at least it was quite entertaining in its campiness, making up for the equal lack of depth and characterization with over-the-top gore and patently silly interactions. It reminded me a bit of the Resident Evil game series (in more ways than one), which got good once it started leaning into its more ridiculous aspects and trying to have some tongue-in-cheek fun with them.
Hell Hole's too repetitive to watch more than once, but for a one-time-thing, the practical effects, cool setting (Here's to post-Soviet industrial decay!) and comedic elements (which I'll charitably hope were intentional) make it worth seeing at least once, even if it's just when you come home from the bar and feel like watching something disposable.
Hell Hole's too repetitive to watch more than once, but for a one-time-thing, the practical effects, cool setting (Here's to post-Soviet industrial decay!) and comedic elements (which I'll charitably hope were intentional) make it worth seeing at least once, even if it's just when you come home from the bar and feel like watching something disposable.
I found the cover for this movie interesting enough to make me stop up and take notice. And with "Hell Hole" being a horror movie that I had neither heard about, much less actually seen before, of course I would sit down and give the movie a fair chance. I am a huge fan of the horror genre after all.
The storyline in "Hell Hole" was pretty straight forward, and it sort of semi-entertaining. However, writers John Adams, Lulu Adams and Toby Poser didn't exactly revolutionize the horror genre with this 2024 movie. If you are a diehard horror fan, then you might get a small kick out of this movie, just keep in mine that you're not in for anything grand. I have to say that the narrative is slow paced and there isn't really a whole lot going on to drive the movie forward, which means parts of the movie are rather sluggish and difficult to sit through.
The only familiar face on the cast list, for me at least, was actor Anders Hove. He was only in the movie for a short time, but it was still a nice thing to have a horror icon such as Anders Hove showing up in a movie such as this. The acting performances in "Hell Hole" were fair.
There was some pretty fun and enjoyable gore in the movie, especially when people were blowing up when the alien parasitic creature would burst out of the host bodies. That was actually quite fun to watch.
When you have a movie that is starring, written and directed by the same two people, you just know it is not going to be a stellar viewing experience.
My rating of directors John Adams and Toby Poser's 2024 movie "Hell Hole" lands on a three out of ten stars, with the gore actually dragging the movie up from an otherwise two out of ten stars rating.
The storyline in "Hell Hole" was pretty straight forward, and it sort of semi-entertaining. However, writers John Adams, Lulu Adams and Toby Poser didn't exactly revolutionize the horror genre with this 2024 movie. If you are a diehard horror fan, then you might get a small kick out of this movie, just keep in mine that you're not in for anything grand. I have to say that the narrative is slow paced and there isn't really a whole lot going on to drive the movie forward, which means parts of the movie are rather sluggish and difficult to sit through.
The only familiar face on the cast list, for me at least, was actor Anders Hove. He was only in the movie for a short time, but it was still a nice thing to have a horror icon such as Anders Hove showing up in a movie such as this. The acting performances in "Hell Hole" were fair.
There was some pretty fun and enjoyable gore in the movie, especially when people were blowing up when the alien parasitic creature would burst out of the host bodies. That was actually quite fun to watch.
When you have a movie that is starring, written and directed by the same two people, you just know it is not going to be a stellar viewing experience.
My rating of directors John Adams and Toby Poser's 2024 movie "Hell Hole" lands on a three out of ten stars, with the gore actually dragging the movie up from an otherwise two out of ten stars rating.
Well . . . If you can sit through the clumsy writing, pregnant pauses and 90s-style soundtrack, this will do as a creature feature that you can watch while doing laundry, vacuuming, or making bird houses. The basic plot is familiar: a team of frackers, joined by scientists and eco-types, unearth a critter that time had forgotten, therein accidentally unleashing a monster on the land.
Nobody in HH can act, with the exception of director/actor Toby Posner, who does the best she can with the limited material. (Frankly, had the delivery of the lines by the other actors been tightened up a few notches, this movie would have been fairly decent.) What budget was on hand was spent on the creature, which is admittedly pretty decent for a low budget movie.
Can''t say I recommend it, but if it is the only thing on, you could do worse.
Nobody in HH can act, with the exception of director/actor Toby Posner, who does the best she can with the limited material. (Frankly, had the delivery of the lines by the other actors been tightened up a few notches, this movie would have been fairly decent.) What budget was on hand was spent on the creature, which is admittedly pretty decent for a low budget movie.
Can''t say I recommend it, but if it is the only thing on, you could do worse.
This has some good elements but it ultimately disappoints. The good elements include a fairly novel monster that's well-utilized; some gory, gross and darkly funny splatter effects; and reasonably good performances. But they're ultimately outweighed by the bad elements: a rather lackluster premise that's like a throwaway X-Files episode; unlikeable characters; and a tepid ending that sputters to a lackluster conclusion. Worst of all is repetitive and redundant expositional dialogue. The characters talk and talk about everything that's happening and they over-explain the nature of the monster, its lifecycle and biology.
Hell Hole is yet another classic example of a decent concept for a horror movie bogged down by bad writing, lackluster acting, lazy production design, and crappy visual effects.
Clearly, this is supposed to be a monster movie primarily, but it has so much needless, boring, and repetitive dialogue that ultimately moves the plot nowhere and gives the characters no real depth at all.
This could've been really good if it were actually exciting and not so dull. It's also worth mentioning that it's basically a cheap knockoff of The Thing or other movies of that ilk, which makes it even less impressive when you look at the bigger picture.
I wish I could've gotten into it, but I just couldn't care enough about the story of the characters to really be invested for more than five minutes at a time.
Clearly, this is supposed to be a monster movie primarily, but it has so much needless, boring, and repetitive dialogue that ultimately moves the plot nowhere and gives the characters no real depth at all.
This could've been really good if it were actually exciting and not so dull. It's also worth mentioning that it's basically a cheap knockoff of The Thing or other movies of that ilk, which makes it even less impressive when you look at the bigger picture.
I wish I could've gotten into it, but I just couldn't care enough about the story of the characters to really be invested for more than five minutes at a time.
Wusstest du schon
- Zitate
Worker: That's a big fucking virus!
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Адская дыра
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 1.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 32 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen