Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe cast of a horror movie reunites to celebrate their success and get more than they bargained for in Marlowe House. Can they survive a horrifying night of ghosts, demonic possessions, murd... Alles lesenThe cast of a horror movie reunites to celebrate their success and get more than they bargained for in Marlowe House. Can they survive a horrifying night of ghosts, demonic possessions, murder and revenge?The cast of a horror movie reunites to celebrate their success and get more than they bargained for in Marlowe House. Can they survive a horrifying night of ghosts, demonic possessions, murder and revenge?
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A Anthony DP Mann flick.
So,Depending on which generation we touch,Imagine Jonathan Frid (From classic Dark Shadows)
being summoned back to Collingswood Manor or Jonathan Rhys Meyers having to tour the TUDORS castle, YIKES !
This haunted ghost story recreates for a podcast the film 'The House Where Evil Was Born' stars reunited in a seance for there director , who may have had help offing himself as film wrapped. There is romance,intrigue and some actually good acting and scares happening here.
So,Depending on which generation we touch,Imagine Jonathan Frid (From classic Dark Shadows)
being summoned back to Collingswood Manor or Jonathan Rhys Meyers having to tour the TUDORS castle, YIKES !
This haunted ghost story recreates for a podcast the film 'The House Where Evil Was Born' stars reunited in a seance for there director , who may have had help offing himself as film wrapped. There is romance,intrigue and some actually good acting and scares happening here.
I saw Ghostkeepers pop up on Hoopla and remembered the director/co-writer/star, Anthony D.P. Mann, from the long-running but now sadly defunct Horror Etc podcast. I turned it on in the background while doing other things, and I think that's probably the best way to watch it. The premise is that a veteran horror actor and his leading lady reunite to record a podcast in a haunted house where they previously filmed a horror movie called "The House Where Evil Was Born" (I think that's the title). In addition to them, the main cast includes the podcast host and producer and a medium brought in to authenticate the supernatural activity in the dwelling.
So, for the unkind criticisms: this movie is pretty amateurish. It's shot on DV and boy does it look like it. The flat, yellow lighting doesn't help, nor do the fairly straightforward shot compositions. The editing is too noticeable; the cuts seem arbitrary and are sometimes jarring rather than fluid and invisible. And the sound...yikes. One of my old film school professors used to say that the quickest way to convince an audience they are watching a low-budget movie is to have bad sound. In some scenes you struggle to hear the actors because the ambient noise all but drowns them out. It makes me wonder if they just used the microphone on the camera. I didn't notice the music, which means it mustn't have been awful.
The acting is...okay. It's hard to judge because the poor sound and sometimes wooden script doesn't do them any favors. I thought Jenny Costanzo as Amber the medium was probably the most watchable. Mann isn't bad--he refrains from being too over-the-top, but I think he might be miscast as horror legend Victor Brimstone. He just doesn't command the authority and gravitas of the true icons of the genre like Vincent Price or Boris Karloff.
Anyway. I'm reluctant to be too hard on the movie because it does represent an endearing enthusiasm for the drama. Everybody involved was really trying, I think. Sometimes with these ultra-low-budget affairs you get the feeling they were just made as a cynical cash-in, or else you feel like you are watching the work of a director who is just orchestrating a cheap drive-in flick in order to get a few actresses naked. (I don't mind nudity in films inherently, but I also don't want to feel like I need to shower after watching one.) I was nervous at first because the female characters in the beginning feel like they have "written-by-men" syndrome--they come across as catty or else outright vituperative for no really good reason. But as the film proceeds they become more three-dimensional and human.
In the end I don't know if I would even really classify "Ghostkeepers" as a horror movie. There aren't that many scare sequences and ultimately it seems more interested in the interpersonal relationships of its characters than in supernatural spookiness. Most of the characters have an arc and I found myself becoming invested in them in spite of myself. If Mann improves sufficiently in the technological department, I think he is capable of a satisfyingly professional and watchable film.
So, for the unkind criticisms: this movie is pretty amateurish. It's shot on DV and boy does it look like it. The flat, yellow lighting doesn't help, nor do the fairly straightforward shot compositions. The editing is too noticeable; the cuts seem arbitrary and are sometimes jarring rather than fluid and invisible. And the sound...yikes. One of my old film school professors used to say that the quickest way to convince an audience they are watching a low-budget movie is to have bad sound. In some scenes you struggle to hear the actors because the ambient noise all but drowns them out. It makes me wonder if they just used the microphone on the camera. I didn't notice the music, which means it mustn't have been awful.
The acting is...okay. It's hard to judge because the poor sound and sometimes wooden script doesn't do them any favors. I thought Jenny Costanzo as Amber the medium was probably the most watchable. Mann isn't bad--he refrains from being too over-the-top, but I think he might be miscast as horror legend Victor Brimstone. He just doesn't command the authority and gravitas of the true icons of the genre like Vincent Price or Boris Karloff.
Anyway. I'm reluctant to be too hard on the movie because it does represent an endearing enthusiasm for the drama. Everybody involved was really trying, I think. Sometimes with these ultra-low-budget affairs you get the feeling they were just made as a cynical cash-in, or else you feel like you are watching the work of a director who is just orchestrating a cheap drive-in flick in order to get a few actresses naked. (I don't mind nudity in films inherently, but I also don't want to feel like I need to shower after watching one.) I was nervous at first because the female characters in the beginning feel like they have "written-by-men" syndrome--they come across as catty or else outright vituperative for no really good reason. But as the film proceeds they become more three-dimensional and human.
In the end I don't know if I would even really classify "Ghostkeepers" as a horror movie. There aren't that many scare sequences and ultimately it seems more interested in the interpersonal relationships of its characters than in supernatural spookiness. Most of the characters have an arc and I found myself becoming invested in them in spite of myself. If Mann improves sufficiently in the technological department, I think he is capable of a satisfyingly professional and watchable film.
"Ghostkeepers" story is a typical draw which hopes to bring the paranormal into the new age of fandom- the podcast and fandom blog world. The movie does a decent enough job to set up the story and give the characters enough to build from, however the attempt seems to fall a bit flat with this film.
The acting is amateurish to the level of uncomfortable to watch. There is one actress who really stands out as a pretty believable talent- Jennifer Verardi. Beyond her character the majority of this film's human aspect seems less than. The acting and melodrama seems to hint to some major chilling aspects of this ghost story but those moments seemed to vanish on screen and the drama just falls dead on the breath of the actors. The spooky thrills that should make any and all paranormal or horror films is almost non-existent in this pic so that was a bit disappointing. I found myself rewinding the disc thinking I missed the action, but that was just wishful thinking-there was almost no real action or chills to be had with "Ghostkeepers". I was not happy with the film and it held little entertainment value for me personally.
The acting is amateurish to the level of uncomfortable to watch. There is one actress who really stands out as a pretty believable talent- Jennifer Verardi. Beyond her character the majority of this film's human aspect seems less than. The acting and melodrama seems to hint to some major chilling aspects of this ghost story but those moments seemed to vanish on screen and the drama just falls dead on the breath of the actors. The spooky thrills that should make any and all paranormal or horror films is almost non-existent in this pic so that was a bit disappointing. I found myself rewinding the disc thinking I missed the action, but that was just wishful thinking-there was almost no real action or chills to be had with "Ghostkeepers". I was not happy with the film and it held little entertainment value for me personally.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAppeared in the achievement hunter show "theater mode", episode 13.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Theater Mode: Ghostkeepers (2016)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 25 Min.(85 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen