Der einst mächtige König Saul fällt seinem eigenen Stolz zum Opfer, und David, ein verstoßener Hirtenjunge, wird zum zweiten König gesalbt.Der einst mächtige König Saul fällt seinem eigenen Stolz zum Opfer, und David, ein verstoßener Hirtenjunge, wird zum zweiten König gesalbt.Der einst mächtige König Saul fällt seinem eigenen Stolz zum Opfer, und David, ein verstoßener Hirtenjunge, wird zum zweiten König gesalbt.
Folgen durchsuchen
Zusammenfassung
Reviewers say 'House of David' is lauded for its captivating storytelling, stunning cinematography, and strong performances, especially the portrayal of King David. The series balances historical accuracy with cinematic flair, creating an immersive experience. However, some criticize creative liberties and historical inaccuracies, which they believe dilute the original story. Despite these concerns, many appreciate the show's engaging and visually appealing approach to the biblical narrative.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
One reviewer gave it a low review because they said they were trying too hard to make it like Game of Thrones. CLEARLY this person has never read the Old Testament because Game of Thrones pales in comparison to the fighting over kingdoms in that part of the Bible. This show does a fantastic job bringing that era in history to life.
As this show goes, I found it as accurate as it could be, considering the Bible is "aerodynamic", seeing as it is very good at getting to the point and not going too in detail with things that ultimately don't matter. So they had to do what they had to do to fill in the blanks with this show, the same way they did with The Chosen, but I feel like it's better done, and more Biblically accurate, that that show. I'd absolutely recommend if you're interested in seeing the Bible fleshed out before your eyes.
As this show goes, I found it as accurate as it could be, considering the Bible is "aerodynamic", seeing as it is very good at getting to the point and not going too in detail with things that ultimately don't matter. So they had to do what they had to do to fill in the blanks with this show, the same way they did with The Chosen, but I feel like it's better done, and more Biblically accurate, that that show. I'd absolutely recommend if you're interested in seeing the Bible fleshed out before your eyes.
This could have been an epic series by jus few changes done. Instead of making a melodramatic soap opera ending with the battle between David and Goliath, this alone should have been given an entire episode. The greatest king who ever lived deserved it. David should have walked the field of battle like he had the entire army of God's angels behind him and not showing any fear although he was a man. He was anointed by God, after all. Also, he wasn't supposed to be touched by Goliath in any way, he was guarded by God. Too bad, to much family drama shown and less history or the portrayal of David.
As a big fan of The Chosen, I was immediately excited when I heard that the story of King David was being adapted into its own series. The biblical account of David is one of the most fascinating stories in the Old Testament-full of drama, suspense, divine guidance, and human struggles. Expectations for a cinematic adaptation were naturally high.
After watching the first two episodes, I can say that House of David has impressed me. The production quality is outstanding, the cinematography is captivating, and the actors bring depth and authenticity to their characters. David, in particular, is portrayed as a complex figure-a young man with a deep relationship with God, yet also grappling with internal struggles and insecurities.
It is clear that the creators of the series have taken some artistic liberties to make the storytelling more engaging. However, these changes do not take away from the core message-in fact, they enhance it. The essence of the story remains intact: David's anointing by God, his time as a shepherd, his legendary battle against Goliath, and his rise to kingship are all told with great dedication.
One aspect I particularly enjoyed is the atmosphere of the series. The sets, costumes, and music all contribute to making the world of the Old Testament feel vivid and immersive. You can sense the harsh realities of life at the time, as well as the spiritual depth of David's relationship with God.
Of course, there are moments when biblically faithful viewers may question whether certain scenes are historically or theologically accurate. But that is a challenge every adaptation of biblical stories faces. What matters most to me is that the central message of the story remains intact-and House of David achieves that remarkably well.
Overall, the first two episodes have left a positive impression on me. I am excited to see how the story unfolds and whether the series does justice to the epic life of David in all its complexity. So far, I am optimistic and looking forward to what's next.
After watching the first two episodes, I can say that House of David has impressed me. The production quality is outstanding, the cinematography is captivating, and the actors bring depth and authenticity to their characters. David, in particular, is portrayed as a complex figure-a young man with a deep relationship with God, yet also grappling with internal struggles and insecurities.
It is clear that the creators of the series have taken some artistic liberties to make the storytelling more engaging. However, these changes do not take away from the core message-in fact, they enhance it. The essence of the story remains intact: David's anointing by God, his time as a shepherd, his legendary battle against Goliath, and his rise to kingship are all told with great dedication.
One aspect I particularly enjoyed is the atmosphere of the series. The sets, costumes, and music all contribute to making the world of the Old Testament feel vivid and immersive. You can sense the harsh realities of life at the time, as well as the spiritual depth of David's relationship with God.
Of course, there are moments when biblically faithful viewers may question whether certain scenes are historically or theologically accurate. But that is a challenge every adaptation of biblical stories faces. What matters most to me is that the central message of the story remains intact-and House of David achieves that remarkably well.
Overall, the first two episodes have left a positive impression on me. I am excited to see how the story unfolds and whether the series does justice to the epic life of David in all its complexity. So far, I am optimistic and looking forward to what's next.
As for as Biblical series go, the first three episodes is one of the best I've seen so far.
They caveat every episode with a statement that some drama has been added to fill out the story however they have tried to remain biblically accurate overall. Yes there is some additional dialogue and aspects not expressely stated in scripture however I don't think it contradicts anything written. The show is not meant to be a substitute for actually reading the Bible, it's supposed to be entertainment based on the Biblical story. Largely they've done a pretty good job.
I see some very petty complaints from those giving bad reviews like Samuel being called a "Seer" rather than a "Prophet". Yet the bible literally says in those days prophets were called seers (1 Samuel 9:9).
Enjoy it for what it is, an entertaining biblical adaptation.
They caveat every episode with a statement that some drama has been added to fill out the story however they have tried to remain biblically accurate overall. Yes there is some additional dialogue and aspects not expressely stated in scripture however I don't think it contradicts anything written. The show is not meant to be a substitute for actually reading the Bible, it's supposed to be entertainment based on the Biblical story. Largely they've done a pretty good job.
I see some very petty complaints from those giving bad reviews like Samuel being called a "Seer" rather than a "Prophet". Yet the bible literally says in those days prophets were called seers (1 Samuel 9:9).
Enjoy it for what it is, an entertaining biblical adaptation.
Why did they pick an actor who looks nothing like the biblical description of David! There's definitely plenty of liberties taken from the biblical text. The mother quoting psalms that weren't even written yet to David in episode 2. I could go on and on. While there's moments that it goes back to the biblical text, there's also outright made up things that did not happen to David. I don't want to post spoilers, but it's distracting to see Goliath attack David in the first episode when that also did not happen. There's plenty of real deep drama in the Biblical text for there to be any need to make up so much BS. We have multiple books from that time period, why not write from 1&2 Samuel, 1&2 kings, psalms, 1& 2 Chornicles, there's endless story line there.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesKing David is described in 1 Samuel 16:12 - "And he sent, and brought him in. Now he was ruddy [admoni], and withal of a beautiful countenance, and goodly to look to. And the Lord said, Arise, anoint him: for this is he." Strong's Lexicon H132 explains the meaning of the word 'admoni,' which is translated in English to 'ruddy.' "The Hebrew word "admoni" is used to describe a reddish or ruddy complexion. It is often associated with a healthy, vibrant appearance and is used in the Bible to describe individuals with a distinct physical characteristic."
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen