The Four Seasons

I don't know how I binge-watched this so fast, I just found myself at the final episodes wondering how the time flied. The episodes are short and pretty fast-paced, so it's super easy to just continue with the next one without realizing how deep you've gone. Also, almost every episode ends with a little twist that hooks you into watching the next one.

I really liked the characters too and their interactions, there's a general feel-good vibe, which made it enjoyable to watch. The thing is... that's exactly why the ending caught me completely off guard. I didn't expect things to take such a turn, especially considering how light the rest of the show felt.

Definitely worth watching, just... be prepared for that ending.

Hindsight is always 20/20. Case in point: I was not that huge a fan of the 1981 ensemble comedy upon which this eight-episode 2025 dramedy series is based. Now however, the series made me appreciate Alan Alda's deft touch in maneuvering a beloved veteran cast through the machinations of the often prickly relationships among three middle-aged married couples across four vacations they share over the course of a year. The series follows the same basic storyline, even sharing the names and general personalities of the original characters (except one) and even replicating some of the same comedy gags. In regard to scripting, Tina Fey takes the reins with co-writers Lang Fisher and Tracey Wigfield, and her dry comedy instincts and clever observations are on display here but not always effectively. Not for a lack of effort by the cast, there's a nagging arm's length distance in the way the supposed closeness of the characters is conveyed. Also compromising the dynamics is the lack of equality in the way the couples are presented, for instance, playing the Alda-Carol Burnett couple, Fey as Kate appears far more alpha and nuanced than Will Forte's non-confrontational Jack. In a turn that downplays his comedy chops, Steve Carell soberly plays Nick whose middle-aged frustration triggers the primary storyline where he leaves his wet-blanket wife Anne and connects with a vibrant young dental hygienist, Ginny. The one casting twist is that the third pair has become Danny and Claude, a married gay couple in an open relationship. The opposites-attract dynamic between Colman Domingo's emotionally resistant Danny and Marco Calvani's overly unctuous Claude is similar to the fractious Jack Weston-Rita Moreno pairing but with obvious differences. The most dramatic change from the movie is the expansion of Anne as a plot catalyst. Whereas in the movie, Anne (played by the estimable Sandy Dennis) disappeared in the second vacation and was given a poignant send-off in the third, she is portrayed in the series by Kerri Kenney in a more persistent vein that evolves into an edgy ambivalence throughout the series. It becomes clear why this change occurred in the last episode when the story takes an unexpected turn that finally gives the characters a more relatable level of resonance that forces them out of their self-absorption. BTW Alda shows up in a welcome cameo as Anne's father in the second episode.

I loved this limited series. Good cast, good script, I laughed out loud several times in every episode. The person whose review called it bourgeois sounded very bitter and was way off base in my opinion. I did not find the characters "out of touch" and there were no "lavish" vacations. One of them owned a vacation home that the all went to twice. One of the other trips was to their and their children's college for " family weekend" and the third was to a presumably inexpensive ie not very fancy Caribbean resort. I have seen the 1981 movie 2-3 times and was pleased with the way this version was similar but did not try to replicate the original. And I loved the ending which I was not expecting. Such an enjoyable experience!

It's a show about three couples of a certain age navigating life, love, and everything in between. It focuses on their relationships with their partners, but just as much on their friendships with each other. Not a family by blood, but a family by choice-by friendship.

It's a fun and funny show. Nothing too deep, just something to enjoy. At least, that's what I thought at first. But it still got me thinking.

When you hit the lower end of your 30s, you imagine that life after a certain age will be dull, settled, over somehow. But this show reminds us that life keeps its complexity. You'll still hesitate to speak your truth. You'll still crave change, or comfort. There's still drama, still sex, still parties. Life doesn't stop. It just shifts. It's pretty much the same as now, maybe with more money, and hopefully, more wisdom.

It's a show about living your life, maybe in the same patient, familiar way you always have, even if that comes with its own problems. Or maybe it's about changing everything, blowing it all up and starting fresh-and that also has its problems. There's no simple way to do it. No perfect path. But the show embraces that messiness.

Tina, Steve, and Coleman are carrying the show. Their acting is light-hearted, funny, sometimes dramatic, but always feels realistic and deeply human.

Like I said, it's a fun show. I laughed out loud. More than once. And when I get older, I want to be like Danny. Maybe he's not even a great role model, but he's fun, sarcastic (he has some fantastic lines!), and he has a great fashion sense.

If you're looking for something to binge-this might just be your show.

I don't really understand a lot of the comments on here, both the ones in favour and against. I enjoyed the show for the most part. It's got an interesting mix of characters, and there's tension because one of the characters decides to leave their wife, which causes mayhem for the group of friends, comprised of three couples. It's not laugh out loud funny but there are plenty of amusing moments, mixed with mostly easy to digest drama. Where it really goes astray however is in the end of the second-last episode and the final episode, when the story takes a twist which just makes the whole show a downer. And totally takes the shine off of it. It wasn't necessary to go this direction at all. Given that the whole series tracks the original film pretty closely, I don't see why they needed to make this particular deviation which took the fun out of the whole thing.