Das lukrative Geschäft einer Heiratsvermittlerin wird kompliziert, als sie in ein toxisches Liebesdreieck gerät, das ihre Kunden bedroht.Das lukrative Geschäft einer Heiratsvermittlerin wird kompliziert, als sie in ein toxisches Liebesdreieck gerät, das ihre Kunden bedroht.Das lukrative Geschäft einer Heiratsvermittlerin wird kompliziert, als sie in ein toxisches Liebesdreieck gerät, das ihre Kunden bedroht.
- Auszeichnungen
- 6 Nominierungen insgesamt
Zoe Winters
- Sophie
- (as Zoë Winters)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I thought this would have been better because past lives was so good, but 2 out of 3 in the love triangle felt very hollow as characters. Dakota Johnson was also really awful which was half of the issue. I'm surprised once she got behind the camera they didn't swap her for another actor - she played her so vacuous I didn't feel any chemistry between her or any other person in the film let alone the 'love interests'. It gave her no room for growth. I didn't care who she ended up with, as the character was so shallow (and that wasn't a script issue per-say). With another actress, this might have been a 7/8. I also didn't understand the character arch for Pedro Pascal, it felt like his character had so much more potential but was reduced to something very hollow. Beautiful cinematography, but something was off with casting and the narrative.
'Materialists' was not what I expected.
It's been marketed like a rom-com - but honestly? If you're heading in expecting laughs, you'll be disappointed. What you get instead is a sharp, quietly melancholic study on modern love, dating, and loneliness in the big city. It's not so much about romance as it is about emotional bankruptcy - the way ambition, money, and appearances slowly chip away at real connection.
The story follows Lucy, a matchmaker who views relationships like transactions, caught between two opposites: Harry, rich and polished, and John, her sweet but struggling ex. But the real tension isn't between them - it's in her. What does she actually want? Love, comfort, validation? Or just a life that looks good on paper?
Celine Song's style is unmistakable - lingering shots, dialogue that feels like internal monologue, and a quiet ache humming underneath it all. At times, it almost felt like watching a late-era Woody Allen film - not in tone, but in that subtle, creeping sense of urban melancholy. By the end, I didn't feel uplifted. I felt... thoughtful. A bit heavy, even.
This is a film about the emotional numbness that sneaks in when we live our lives through filters - digital and otherwise. About the loneliness hiding behind perfect apartments and curated dating profiles. And how love (or at least the idea of it) gets commodified without us even noticing.
Not a rom-com. Not really even a romance. More of a character study. A mood piece. A quiet critique. And once I let go of what I thought it was meant to be, I found I really liked it, and I hope you do too.
It's been marketed like a rom-com - but honestly? If you're heading in expecting laughs, you'll be disappointed. What you get instead is a sharp, quietly melancholic study on modern love, dating, and loneliness in the big city. It's not so much about romance as it is about emotional bankruptcy - the way ambition, money, and appearances slowly chip away at real connection.
The story follows Lucy, a matchmaker who views relationships like transactions, caught between two opposites: Harry, rich and polished, and John, her sweet but struggling ex. But the real tension isn't between them - it's in her. What does she actually want? Love, comfort, validation? Or just a life that looks good on paper?
Celine Song's style is unmistakable - lingering shots, dialogue that feels like internal monologue, and a quiet ache humming underneath it all. At times, it almost felt like watching a late-era Woody Allen film - not in tone, but in that subtle, creeping sense of urban melancholy. By the end, I didn't feel uplifted. I felt... thoughtful. A bit heavy, even.
This is a film about the emotional numbness that sneaks in when we live our lives through filters - digital and otherwise. About the loneliness hiding behind perfect apartments and curated dating profiles. And how love (or at least the idea of it) gets commodified without us even noticing.
Not a rom-com. Not really even a romance. More of a character study. A mood piece. A quiet critique. And once I let go of what I thought it was meant to be, I found I really liked it, and I hope you do too.
Sad depressing melodramatic melancholy movie with wrong modern day portrayals. Very little comedy and almost a bit scary especially some of the subject matter which was quite sad. I can't think of a particular time or generation on this type of romantic activity would have been common or normal. Also substandard acting and directing.
Celine Song is the writer and Director of "Past Lives" (2023) and all I can say it's one of the best films I've ever seen.
Unfortunately the same style and formula made for Past Lives didn't work this time with Materialists. The storytelling of body language, lack of words, the lack of explanation, lack details in their dialogue, the simplicity didn't really add to the story where as Past Lives worked perfectly.
Sorry if I compare it to Past Lives, I know I shouldn't they're both completely different. Besides its not fair.
I think this movie could have been great if the writer would've written the screenplay as realistic as possible. The movie would hit completely different.
I love Pedro Pascal, I'm a fan of his and have posters of him in my room and stuff. Dakota and Chris are great actors, in general the actors did what they could with the script they were given.
Even though I was underwhelmed I was thoroughly entertained the whole time I watched the movie and that's what movies are supposed to do. Maybe it deserves a higher score.
Unfortunately the same style and formula made for Past Lives didn't work this time with Materialists. The storytelling of body language, lack of words, the lack of explanation, lack details in their dialogue, the simplicity didn't really add to the story where as Past Lives worked perfectly.
Sorry if I compare it to Past Lives, I know I shouldn't they're both completely different. Besides its not fair.
I think this movie could have been great if the writer would've written the screenplay as realistic as possible. The movie would hit completely different.
I love Pedro Pascal, I'm a fan of his and have posters of him in my room and stuff. Dakota and Chris are great actors, in general the actors did what they could with the script they were given.
Even though I was underwhelmed I was thoroughly entertained the whole time I watched the movie and that's what movies are supposed to do. Maybe it deserves a higher score.
I watched this without knowing anything about it. I only knew the title and the fact that Pedro Pascal was in it. No trailers, nothing.
To me this just feels like a movie desperately trying to communicate the worlds most obvious ideas and stories, while trying to make it profound in some way. Is this a New York thing (I'm European)? Is it a generational thing (I'm a millennial)? - This movie is like half an idea and a bad sentence stretched over two hours.
This was really nothing, and I would prefer watching paint dry, if it wasn't for the relatively good technical quality.
Do something else with your time. Anything.
To me this just feels like a movie desperately trying to communicate the worlds most obvious ideas and stories, while trying to make it profound in some way. Is this a New York thing (I'm European)? Is it a generational thing (I'm a millennial)? - This movie is like half an idea and a bad sentence stretched over two hours.
This was really nothing, and I would prefer watching paint dry, if it wasn't for the relatively good technical quality.
Do something else with your time. Anything.
Are We Talking About Love Triangles With Pedro Pascal?
Are We Talking About Love Triangles With Pedro Pascal?
Dakota Johnson and Chris Evans get candid about what went down while filming Materialists with Pedro Pascal.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWriter/director Celine Song's name is listed as the playwright for John's play on a poster outside the theater, because the play is actually a real one she wrote back in 2016.
- PatzerWhen Lucy and John are sitting on a bench towards the end of the movie and she finishes her phone-call, it's clearly visible that the phone is on the lock-screen, and not in a call.
- Zitate
Harry's Father: When you get lost... and I know you'll be lost at times... it's life. When you're lost... the answer is simple. Just go where love is.
- Crazy CreditsAt the end of credits scene of people getting married, the cave people are seen happily walking out of the room together.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Materialistas
- Drehorte
- Crested Hen Farms, High Falls New York, USA(The outdoor wedding scene at the barn outside of New York City.)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 20.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 36.503.614 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 11.338.642 $
- 15. Juni 2025
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 85.103.614 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 56 Min.(116 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen