A Very Royal Scandal

Watched all three, back to back on the day it dropped on amazon. Amazing fantastic brilliant was my opinion of this excellent beautifully constructed drama. Ruth wilson as Emily Matis, and Michael sheen as Andrew were as they always are fantastic in there roles as was all the supporting roles with for me a special nod for the actor who played the Queens Private secretary. I personally also thought it was better than the BBC version they did a little while ago although that was also very good. So I highly recommended this amazon three part drama. Please don't think because you watched the original interview, that's it . Because it's far more than that.

I had missed, perhaps even avoided the original transmission of this three-part Amazon mini-series centring on the famous or infamous, depending on how you look at it, BBC Newsnight interview carried out with Prince Andrew by the station's Emily Maitlis. However, it naturally came back to mind after the sad news of the Prince's accuser Virginia Gioffre's very recent suicide. That said, the late Ms Gioffre barely makes appearance in this dramatisation, apart from actual footage of her being interviewed on TV stating her case and of course featuring prominently in the photograph taken by Jeffrey Epstein of the Prince with his arm around her as Epstein's convicted procurer Ghislaine Maxwell looks on.

Of course, as the printed text makes clear at the outset of each programme, much of what we see here is imagined from the known facts and obviously dramatised for effect. Thus the only thing to completely trust here is the verifiable recreation of the actual interview itself between the Prince and Maitlis and although understandably no one from the Palace is credited with assisting in the making of the programme, I would like to think that Matlis herself was open and honest with her input to what we see here.

Over the three episodes, the two main characters, the Prince and Maitlis get almost equal coverage. We see each of them interact with their families and for want of a better word, their staff, although obviously the Royal can count on more resources in that respect. I personally feel this approach was wrong as for me the scandal surrounding Andrew is the story and not the interviewer, no matter how well the latter does her job.

The Prince is presented as a boor, expecting everyone in his orbit to ask how high when he commands them to jump, usually with added expletives. In particular he unloads on his long-suffering ex-wife Sarah Ferguson, presented as a parasite and sycophant who's a financial drain on her ex-husband and his meek subservient P. A. Amanda Thirsk. When his New York-based friend and at times landlord and banker, the convicted sex-offender Jeffrey Epstein apparently commits suicide in his prison cell and Miss Guiffre comes forward to allege that Andrew raped her three different times at three diffetent places always in Epstein's vicinity, the Prince comes under pressure to try to clear his name, which he chooses to do on national TV interviewed by the very capable Ms Maitlis. Although we never see them, it's made clear that the Queen and Prince and now King Charles take a keen interest in the affair with the general Palace consensus being that Andrew should try to ride out the storm rather than face it head on, encouraged in the latter course by his PA and older daughter.

We all know of course that the actual prime-time interview was a veritable car-crash for Andrew and that in its wake, a hefty no-liabilty settlement was offered to Miss Jioffre, likely from the Queen's purse, which the young woman couldn't turn down. No doubt it was hoped that this would make the story would go away but with further revelations about Andrew's shady business connections coming out in recent times to further sully his reputation, it's clear that his reputation has taken an irreversible hit, this only compounded with the news of Miss Gioffre's seeming death by suicide.

Although neither quite looks the part, the chameleon-like Michael Sheen and the equally skilled Ruth Wilson certainly convince as the two leads. For me, however, a good portion of the scenes presented just didn't quite ring true, often hindered by questionable dialogue and unsatisfactory scene-setting. I very much doubt that Andrew's two daughters ever joked about his old "Randy Andy" nickname or that he himself mentions fighting in the Falklands any chance he gets, although I am willing to believe his kids call him "Pups" and that he calls the queen "Mummy" but therein lies the problem. For every telling line and sly in-joke there were others which seemed hyperbolic and implausible. I'm no royalist myself but even I thought Andrew's petulant and bullying characterisation as depicted here seemed a touch heavy-handed, even as I personally doubt his vividly remembered Pizza Express visit and his frankly bizarre claim not to sweat which contrasts with his amnesia about ever encountering Miss Gioffre on three occasions. Of course, he was never going to confess on live TV to anything to his own detriment, but if he was innocent all along, then why not take it to court rather than make a multi-million pound payment just because you, or rather your mother can.

Still, like a real car crash, you couldn't turn your head away from all three hours of it. For the Prince, who has lost his royal term of address and been forced to retreat from active duty, he appears to have been tried and convicted at least in the eyes of the public, but as Maitlis points out at one juncture, let's not forget that here is a man born to luxury and privilege who still lives in a palace and is waited on hand and foot out of the public purse, and benefits from all the protective mechanisms that the Palace automatically confers on him. We should have his problems. Then compare that with the sad fate of Miss Gioffre, used, abused and trafficked as a young girl, who in the end, despite receiving a huge compensation settlement, decided she couldn't go on with her own life. I'm not saying that her suicide can be laid entirely at the door of Prince Andrew but it clearly weighed heavily on her, especially with all the attendant publicity.

How is it the old song goes?

"It's the same the whole world over, It's the poor what gets the blame, It's the rich what gets the pleasure, Isn't it a blooming shame?"

P. S. Do go back and watch, as I did, the full interview, which is available on YouTube. It's absolutely riveting.

Hmmm. Time, I think, for the team behind this Scandal series to move on. It's clear now that they're never going to equal, much less top, the brilliance of A Very English Scandal, in which Hugh Grant and Ben Whishaw turned the Jeremy Thorpe story into a riotous and riveting frolic. The sequel - A Very British Scandal - was an undercooked and ultimately unsatisfying account of the sordid saga of the Duchess of Argyll. But there was every reason to expect a return to form with this account of the bottomless sleazefest that engulfed the Duke of York. Unfortunately, A Very Royal Scandal is even more timid and turgid than the Argyll affair. I can't help wondering if those involved just can't bring themselves to really go for it when the subject is royalty. It's interesting, by way of example, that both the Queen and Prince Charles are afforded a degree of dignity and immunity, in that they remain off screen throughout, their decisions and dictates delivered by envoys and fixers. Yet they are really as much a part of the story as the Duke of York, and they are engaged in an epic battle to save the monarchy from ruin. And if you can invent scenes and dialogue for Andy, Fergie, Bea and Eugenie, then why not Liz and Charles too? Letting them off the hook is the main reason this Royal Scandal looks continually lame. It is also poorly served by the casting. Michael Sheen gives what is in many ways a well judged and finely wrought performance as Andrew, but he still doesn't quite pull off the arrogance and the obliviousness. And Ruth Wilson is undone by an ill-judged and annoying vocal impression of Emily Maitliss, that somehow comes off as more like Fenella Fielding in Carry On Screaming. Claire Rushbrook is also a poor choice as Fergie, which even the director seems to acknowledge by shooting her mostly from behind, or in profile, or in soft focus at the edge of frame. There's enough schadenfreude.to keep it mildly interesting, but it never fully takes flight. Except maybe at the very end, when Randy Andy, shamed and banished, wonders what he's supposed to do now. Sir Edward Young, played by Alex Jennings, tells him: "live with the consequences of your actions". The preceding three hours could have done with a bit more of the same blunt honesty.

I like Ruth Wilson as an actress, but I think Gillian Anderson's portrayal as Emily Matliss just pipped her, I think they should/could have put this into 2 episodes, I found myself drifting in the third although maybe then they would have cut the best line in the drama "I would have offered you tea but we've had to let the the staff go" this line delivered by "Fergie" played brilliantly by Claire Rushbrook, to the equally excellent Alex Jennings playing the Queens deliverer of bad news ,Sir Edward Young,this line probably sums up the weird world that they live in. Make it yourself you entitled so and so,shout all us commoners!

Was he guilty ? Maybe, Was he innocent ? Maybe Was/is he an idiot? No maybe's about this one .

Obviously huge chunks of this docudrama are fictionalised as it portrays what was going on behind the scenes leading up to, during and after the controversial BBC interview with Prince Andrew. We see a lot of Andrew's family and Royal advisors and Emily Maitlis' family and colleagues at the BBC (By the way, I think this is far better dramatisation than the recent version starring Billie Piper which was told through the eyes of a BBC researcher.) Michael Sheen must be one of, if not the best character actors of his time. He does not particularly resemble some of the characters he portrays but with excellent input from wardrobe and make up and his ability to deliver lines with the mannerisms of these people he is utterly convincing in the part. It is thus the case with his portrayal of Prince Andrew. Ruth Wilson is very good to in the role of Emily Maitlis.

I think it was an appropriate we do not see any of the Royal family other than Andrew's immediate family portrayed on screen. Mummy and Charles speak to Andrew over the phone and we do not see or hear them. We do have a lot of fictionalised dialogue between Andrew, his daughters and ex-wife Fergie. And some rather cringing scenes with Andrew's staff especially Amanda Thirsk played by Joanna Scanlon. This we should take with a pinch of salt and not as a historical account. We can assume that Emily Maitlis is happy with the depiction of her input into the interview and family life as she was plugging the drama on GMB the day before it dropped on Amazon Prime.

I binge watched all 3 episodes because it is such a good dramatisation not because I wanted to know how it ended.