1992

Great stuff. I'm British and finding this period in Italian history gripping.. the great acting helps too

Here we have a wonderfully written and produced historical fiction based on events occurring in Italy (mainly) during the '90ies (this is meant to be the first season covering the year 1992). It's a pity I didn't watch it 2 years ago when it was originally released: 2 years is a lot of things watched meanwhile and I might have enjoyed it even more.

In 1992 I was 13 like the protagonist's daughter. Possibly I remember much more of that year, its vibe, people's bafflement and reactions, than most non-historians adults. Then, various cultural dynamics heavily fighting unlawful conducts matured and gained power; peculiar loathing was raised by the standard corruptive practices in politics. This resulted in a period of political instability (or irrelevance?) that hasn't actually ended yet (but that's debatable). Perhaps the major effect was the influence on the new generations' perspective: more disillusioned, and - if not more honest - at least less dumb. And still victims of yet other fairy tales: the show business, liberalism and various forms of populism.

While in today's connected world these events might seem unimportant, they represented an overwhelming wake-up call for the people of one of the major economies of the planet (like Italy was in the 90ies). And portrayed in this fashion they truly shine. Many lines, scenes and acting moments are brilliant in their gritty cynicism, evocative glamour or punching irony.

Nonetheless we have a volatile screenplay as well: mostly it's incredibly vivid but throughout the series we have also a bit too many in-depth romantic relationships, anguish-squeezing drama and trite situations. Above all: too many tight links among the fictitious/historic protagonists. They meet and influence the core story-line; then they leave each other; then they meet again and change the story again. And this happens multiple times for all the main characters: a bit too much to be believable. Writers could have given some space to other actors without generating the natural skepticism that occurs when "history worthy" things happen but no real history book talks about our fictional protagonists: is it likely?

A couple of things nearly kept me from giving the series a full 9 (i.e. like Tea Falco's delivery, Accorsi's "too cool" character, or a populist congressman and a starlet having public-sex in central Rome: a little too much beyond belief...) but overall it's just nitpicking (and actually Accorsi carries every scene he's in).

International appeal is a possible concern though: the story-line is very complex, with a lot of different real-life people involved about whom you can hardly find anything online which is not in Italian. So any attempt to give substance and depth to what non-Italian audiences are watching might easily fail. And this could ultimately result in a parade of politicians, bureaucrats, businessmen, etc etc you don't know and care about.

Given this caveat, 1992 is surely one of the best recent historic-drama series worldwide; so good it could well be used to entertain and still inspire bored high-schoolers towards serious history research.

Both 1992, 1993 and 1994 (so far) have been among the best series I have ever watched. A sort of European "House of Cards", this series presents the most defining political events in 90ies Italy in a totally captivating way. At times a few developments are a bit hard to believe, but hey, this is fiction after all. And the tale carries lessons for the rest of Europe and the world, too. Outstanding performances by a host of actors who more than match Holly- and Bollywood any day.

I recommend this show to everyone who is curious about the uniquely unpredictable Italian political drama of the 1990s, and in particular how the arrest of a second-rate politician triggered a chain of events leading to a radical restructuring of the systems of power in the country.

If as a non-Italian you are under the misapprehension that you know anything about Berlusconi, think again. You know almost nothing. The story is both more interesting and far, far scarier than you think.

The story is of course embellished but the main turning points are factual and the historical figures are fairly accurately portrayed.

The acting is laughably overdone but sadly that is the case for most Italian dramas of the last 30 odd years. Actresses such as Margherita Buy (not on this show) contributed to creating a modern tradition of Italian acting that cannot properly express intensity and dramatic tension because *every* line is delivered with exaggerated intensity.

Last, women in the show are for the most part eye candy. The show wants us to appreciate that Miriam Leone is a piece of ass, and that would be fine if it weren't for the fact that we are constantly shown her actual ass without it playing any role in the story, just because it sells.

Full confession, I grew up as an American in Rome, Italy. I return every year on vacation. I generally search out every TV/Movie production I can find in the US in Italian, and they are rare, TV shows more so than movies. 1992 is about the rise of Silvio Berlusconi, a political leader in Italy who was elected twice and disgraced twice. In real life he made his money in media like Ted Turner, but his political leanings were similar to Donald Trump. And while the show depicts the year 1992 that gave rise to Silvio, he isn't shown much and appears at the fringe of the action -- for first the Italian government must fall. And for the most part the characters that inhabit this 10 part series are fictional. But a lot of the themes are real -- i.e., the "Clean Hands" movement to rid the Italian system of corruption, and the rise of the "Lega" -- the Northern League of nationalists politically. I am subjective in my liking most well produced Italian TV. If you have an affinity for Italy, and a basic understanding of the country you will also enjoy it. It's well acted and a concise drama. And it's subtitled in English.