Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.An unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.An unconventional anti-terrorist operative must defy his bosses in order to foil a devastating attack on his nation in this action thriller.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Nice movie enjoyed it was Siddhus show he gave very good performance the action sequence and a different flavor. Vaishnavi was great too..wish it had more twists in the movie. The train seen was excellent. Siddhu's dance was super cool. Overall I liked it. More thriller with part 2 with twists for..Siddu..is extremely talented..he shud be given more flavor s in the movie...with double roles. It's a decent entertainer. However story line is great wish bb the director should have added more comedy seens and track b/w siddu and vaishnavi love track and Thriller. Everyone performance is great. Siddhu was the best Jack as usual and all the best to the team. Songs are decent, action was great the background music during action sequence was cool. Pablo neruda song is cool. Ok brahmaji..seens i thought there will be more comedy seens or some role connected from him. I guess we as audience think with more expectations but this movie was pretty straightforward not a thriller or any role that you will feel as twisted. Overall one time watch and good entertainment.
What do you get when you bring together
atrocious action
directionless direction, and
a pointless meaningless script
no points for guessing
You get the telugu movie 'Jack'
I am a movie buff, and over the decades have sat through very mediocre stuff being passed off as cinema, but the current crop of filmmakers make the bad movies of the yesteryears seem good in comparison
i couldn't sit through 20 minutes of the 'movie' as i had developed a migraine
watch at your own risk of developing dis-taste and disliking for the movies as a genre of entertainment
I am still astounded and dumbfounded at how these movie scripts and ideas get funded in the first place.
You get the telugu movie 'Jack'
I am a movie buff, and over the decades have sat through very mediocre stuff being passed off as cinema, but the current crop of filmmakers make the bad movies of the yesteryears seem good in comparison
i couldn't sit through 20 minutes of the 'movie' as i had developed a migraine
watch at your own risk of developing dis-taste and disliking for the movies as a genre of entertainment
I am still astounded and dumbfounded at how these movie scripts and ideas get funded in the first place.
Certainly! Here's a more detailed 600-word review of *Jack* (1996):
---
**Movie Review: *Jack* (1996)**
Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, *Jack* (1996) is a heartfelt yet uneven film that attempts to blend comedy and drama with a profound emotional core. Starring Robin Williams in the titular role, the film centers on a boy named Jack who, due to a rare condition, ages four times faster than normal. The story explores themes of childhood, human connection, and the challenges of fitting into a society that values conformity, but it ultimately leaves audiences with mixed emotions.
**Plot Summary**
Jack Powell (Robin Williams) is a 10-year-old boy who, due to a rare genetic disorder, looks and physically ages like a 40-year-old man. His body may be old, but his mind and emotional development are still that of a child, making him an innocent, naïve figure trapped in an adult's body. Raised in relative isolation by his parents, Jack has been sheltered from the world. However, as he reaches his 10th birthday, his parents decide it's time for him to experience the outside world by enrolling him in a public school.
The film follows Jack's struggles with fitting in, making friends, and dealing with his own insecurities about his appearance. He befriends a group of children at school and even experiences his first crush, but the emotional and physical challenges he faces, as well as the way society perceives him, create a poignant narrative about acceptance, growth, and the difficulties of being different.
**Performance and Direction**
Robin Williams brings his signature warmth and vulnerability to the role of Jack. Known for his ability to seamlessly combine humor and pathos, Williams' performance is the heart of the film. He plays Jack with a childlike wonder and innocence, which makes the character both endearing and heartbreaking. His portrayal of a boy who longs to experience childhood like everyone else but is physically unable to do so creates a character that feels deeply tragic yet optimistic at the same time. Williams' ability to evoke laughter and tears within moments demonstrates his unparalleled skill as an actor.
However, while Williams' performance is undoubtedly impressive, the film itself lacks a certain cohesion in terms of direction. Francis Ford Coppola, best known for his masterpieces like *The Godfather* trilogy and *Apocalypse Now*, takes on a lighter, more family-friendly subject here, but his handling of the material feels uneven. The pacing of the film often drags, and some scenes verge on melodrama, undermining the emotional depth that the story attempts to convey. There is also a sense of tonal inconsistency-at times, the film swings between sentimental moments and comedic sequences, which can feel disjointed.
**Themes and Emotional Impact**
At its core, *Jack* attempts to explore the complexities of growing up, but with a twist. It raises significant questions about how people define maturity and the inherent value of childhood. Jack's condition forces him to confront adulthood far too early, creating a stark contrast between his emotional innocence and his adult appearance. The film explores how society reacts to those who don't fit into conventional molds and the loneliness that comes with being different.
Despite its noble intentions, the film often leans heavily into sentimentality. The emotional moments, though heartfelt, occasionally feel manipulative, especially with the overuse of music to underscore poignant scenes. These moments may resonate with some viewers, but for others, they risk feeling contrived.
The film also addresses themes of family and love, with Jack's parents (played by Diane Lane and Brian Kerwin) portrayed as deeply caring but ultimately protective, perhaps to a fault. Their desire to shelter Jack from the world is understandable, but it leads to his eventual realization that he must face the harsh realities of life if he is ever to grow beyond his limitations.
**Critical Reception**
Upon its release, *Jack* received mixed reviews from critics. While Robin Williams' performance garnered praise for its charm and emotional depth, the film itself received more lukewarm feedback. Critics noted that while the premise had great potential, the execution fell short in terms of both tone and pacing. On Rotten Tomatoes, *Jack* holds a 17% approval rating, based on 36 reviews, indicating a generally negative reception. However, some audiences found value in the movie's sentimental qualities, enjoying it as a lighthearted yet emotional family film.
**Conclusion**
*Jack* is a film that ultimately leaves a lasting impression, primarily due to Robin Williams' remarkable performance. The film's exploration of complex themes like childhood, societal expectations, and personal growth is thought-provoking but often overshadowed by its reliance on sentimentality and uneven direction. While Coppola's take on the material doesn't entirely work, the emotional journey of Jack Powell offers a poignant reflection on life's fleeting nature, the importance of love and acceptance, and the value of remaining true to oneself, no matter the physical limitations. For fans of Robin Williams or those who appreciate family-oriented dramas, *Jack* remains a touching if imperfect film.
---
**Movie Review: *Jack* (1996)**
Directed by Francis Ford Coppola, *Jack* (1996) is a heartfelt yet uneven film that attempts to blend comedy and drama with a profound emotional core. Starring Robin Williams in the titular role, the film centers on a boy named Jack who, due to a rare condition, ages four times faster than normal. The story explores themes of childhood, human connection, and the challenges of fitting into a society that values conformity, but it ultimately leaves audiences with mixed emotions.
**Plot Summary**
Jack Powell (Robin Williams) is a 10-year-old boy who, due to a rare genetic disorder, looks and physically ages like a 40-year-old man. His body may be old, but his mind and emotional development are still that of a child, making him an innocent, naïve figure trapped in an adult's body. Raised in relative isolation by his parents, Jack has been sheltered from the world. However, as he reaches his 10th birthday, his parents decide it's time for him to experience the outside world by enrolling him in a public school.
The film follows Jack's struggles with fitting in, making friends, and dealing with his own insecurities about his appearance. He befriends a group of children at school and even experiences his first crush, but the emotional and physical challenges he faces, as well as the way society perceives him, create a poignant narrative about acceptance, growth, and the difficulties of being different.
**Performance and Direction**
Robin Williams brings his signature warmth and vulnerability to the role of Jack. Known for his ability to seamlessly combine humor and pathos, Williams' performance is the heart of the film. He plays Jack with a childlike wonder and innocence, which makes the character both endearing and heartbreaking. His portrayal of a boy who longs to experience childhood like everyone else but is physically unable to do so creates a character that feels deeply tragic yet optimistic at the same time. Williams' ability to evoke laughter and tears within moments demonstrates his unparalleled skill as an actor.
However, while Williams' performance is undoubtedly impressive, the film itself lacks a certain cohesion in terms of direction. Francis Ford Coppola, best known for his masterpieces like *The Godfather* trilogy and *Apocalypse Now*, takes on a lighter, more family-friendly subject here, but his handling of the material feels uneven. The pacing of the film often drags, and some scenes verge on melodrama, undermining the emotional depth that the story attempts to convey. There is also a sense of tonal inconsistency-at times, the film swings between sentimental moments and comedic sequences, which can feel disjointed.
**Themes and Emotional Impact**
At its core, *Jack* attempts to explore the complexities of growing up, but with a twist. It raises significant questions about how people define maturity and the inherent value of childhood. Jack's condition forces him to confront adulthood far too early, creating a stark contrast between his emotional innocence and his adult appearance. The film explores how society reacts to those who don't fit into conventional molds and the loneliness that comes with being different.
Despite its noble intentions, the film often leans heavily into sentimentality. The emotional moments, though heartfelt, occasionally feel manipulative, especially with the overuse of music to underscore poignant scenes. These moments may resonate with some viewers, but for others, they risk feeling contrived.
The film also addresses themes of family and love, with Jack's parents (played by Diane Lane and Brian Kerwin) portrayed as deeply caring but ultimately protective, perhaps to a fault. Their desire to shelter Jack from the world is understandable, but it leads to his eventual realization that he must face the harsh realities of life if he is ever to grow beyond his limitations.
**Critical Reception**
Upon its release, *Jack* received mixed reviews from critics. While Robin Williams' performance garnered praise for its charm and emotional depth, the film itself received more lukewarm feedback. Critics noted that while the premise had great potential, the execution fell short in terms of both tone and pacing. On Rotten Tomatoes, *Jack* holds a 17% approval rating, based on 36 reviews, indicating a generally negative reception. However, some audiences found value in the movie's sentimental qualities, enjoying it as a lighthearted yet emotional family film.
**Conclusion**
*Jack* is a film that ultimately leaves a lasting impression, primarily due to Robin Williams' remarkable performance. The film's exploration of complex themes like childhood, societal expectations, and personal growth is thought-provoking but often overshadowed by its reliance on sentimentality and uneven direction. While Coppola's take on the material doesn't entirely work, the emotional journey of Jack Powell offers a poignant reflection on life's fleeting nature, the importance of love and acceptance, and the value of remaining true to oneself, no matter the physical limitations. For fans of Robin Williams or those who appreciate family-oriented dramas, *Jack* remains a touching if imperfect film.
Jack (2025) is a Telugu film that may not have hit the mark at the box office, but for some viewers like me, it still offers an enjoyable ride - mainly because of its unique central character and a performance that stands out.
Siddhu Jonnalagadda shines in his role as Pablo Neruda alias "Jack", a passionate R&AW aspirant caught between ambition, identity, and chaos. His portrayal brings a certain charisma and unpredictability to the film that keeps you invested, even when the narrative dips.
The story itself is above average - not groundbreaking, but serviceable. It has enough intrigue and character moments to hold your attention, even if it doesn't always deliver on its potential. The pacing is uneven at times, and some subplots feel undercooked. However, it's Siddhu's energy and screen presence that glue the film together.
Unfortunately, Jack has suffered from a wave of negative reviews and didn't do well commercially, which is disappointing. While it's far from perfect, it's not entirely deserving of the harsh criticism either. The movie has flaws, yes - but also heart.
Verdict: Jack may not be for everyone, but if you appreciate strong performances and are open to a slightly offbeat, character-driven story, it's worth a watch.
Siddhu Jonnalagadda shines in his role as Pablo Neruda alias "Jack", a passionate R&AW aspirant caught between ambition, identity, and chaos. His portrayal brings a certain charisma and unpredictability to the film that keeps you invested, even when the narrative dips.
The story itself is above average - not groundbreaking, but serviceable. It has enough intrigue and character moments to hold your attention, even if it doesn't always deliver on its potential. The pacing is uneven at times, and some subplots feel undercooked. However, it's Siddhu's energy and screen presence that glue the film together.
Unfortunately, Jack has suffered from a wave of negative reviews and didn't do well commercially, which is disappointing. While it's far from perfect, it's not entirely deserving of the harsh criticism either. The movie has flaws, yes - but also heart.
Verdict: Jack may not be for everyone, but if you appreciate strong performances and are open to a slightly offbeat, character-driven story, it's worth a watch.
Movie Review: "Jack" (Telugu) - A Misfire from Bommarillu Bhaskar
"Jack" is one of those films that leaves you wondering how a seasoned director like Bommarillu Bhaskar, known for emotionally rich and family-oriented films, could come up with something so disappointing. After watching the film, I found myself questioning not just the story, but every major decision behind the making of this movie. From casting to screenplay, from acting to editing - everything feels like a missed opportunity.
Let's begin with the most obvious problem: the hero's performance. The lead actor, whose name is relatively new in the industry, delivers one of the most forgettable performances I've seen in recent times. His expressions are forced, his dialogue delivery is flat, and his screen presence is utterly lacking. It's hard to connect with the protagonist or feel any empathy toward his journey because the actor himself doesn't seem to believe in what he's doing. A hero must carry the emotional weight of a film, but here, he simply drags it down.
Then comes Prakash Raj, a seasoned actor known for his powerful screen presence and emotional intensity. But in "Jack," he goes completely overboard. His acting feels theatrical and unnecessarily loud. Instead of enhancing the emotional quotient of the movie, he becomes a source of irritation. His role is written in a way that is supposed to be impactful, maybe even heart-touching, but the execution is poor, and his overacting ruins whatever little potential the role had.
The storyline is another letdown. The film doesn't seem to have a clear direction. It tries to be a love story, a family drama, a self-discovery journey, and a commercial entertainer - all at once - but fails to excel in any department. The narrative is painfully predictable and lacks emotional depth. Scenes that are meant to be dramatic feel artificial and manipulative. There's no emotional hook to keep the audience invested.
Dialogues are bland and repetitive. Instead of making us think or feel, they often make us cringe. Attempts at humor fall flat. Even supposedly serious scenes feel unintentionally funny. It's almost like the writers forgot what emotion they were trying to convey in each scene.
The direction by Bommarillu Bhaskar is shockingly weak. Known for giving us heartfelt films like "Bommarillu" and "Parugu," one expects a certain emotional intelligence and sensitivity in his work. But "Jack" lacks any of that charm or maturity. The characters are one-dimensional, the screenplay is messy, and the pacing is painfully slow. Bhaskar seems to have lost his touch in connecting with the audience. It's hard to believe the same director who gave us Siddu and Genelia's lovable chemistry in "Bommarillu" has now directed this chaotic, soulless film.
Music and background score are forgettable. None of the songs stay with you. They appear randomly and often interrupt the flow of the story, which is already struggling. The background music tries to add emotion where the scenes fail but ends up sounding like a desperate attempt to force feelings onto the audience.
Cinematography is decent in parts, but there's nothing particularly unique or visually striking. The locations are standard, the framing lacks creativity, and the visuals do little to elevate the storytelling.
Editing is another weak point. Scenes linger for too long, transitions feel abrupt, and overall pacing is inconsistent. Some scenes could have easily been cut without affecting the story, while others needed better buildup.
Even the supporting cast is underutilized. The heroine's role is underwritten, and there is zero chemistry between the lead pair. The romantic track feels forced and rushed. There is no natural development of their relationship, making it hard to root for them.
If I had to sum it up, "Jack" is a film that had potential but is marred by poor execution on all fronts. It's a perfect example of how even talented directors can go off track when the basics are ignored. A good film starts with a good script, but here, everything feels half-baked.
As a viewer, I felt no emotional connection, no excitement, and certainly no satisfaction after watching this film. It tested my patience and made me appreciate the value of storytelling done right. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, unless they're curious about how a film can go so wrong in so many ways.
In conclusion, "Jack" is a disaster of a film, made worse by bad acting, a weak story, and confused direction. Bommarillu Bhaskar may have taken a big risk with this one, but unfortunately, it didn't pay off. If anything, it serves as a reminder that name and experience alone can't save a film without heart and soul.
"Jack" is one of those films that leaves you wondering how a seasoned director like Bommarillu Bhaskar, known for emotionally rich and family-oriented films, could come up with something so disappointing. After watching the film, I found myself questioning not just the story, but every major decision behind the making of this movie. From casting to screenplay, from acting to editing - everything feels like a missed opportunity.
Let's begin with the most obvious problem: the hero's performance. The lead actor, whose name is relatively new in the industry, delivers one of the most forgettable performances I've seen in recent times. His expressions are forced, his dialogue delivery is flat, and his screen presence is utterly lacking. It's hard to connect with the protagonist or feel any empathy toward his journey because the actor himself doesn't seem to believe in what he's doing. A hero must carry the emotional weight of a film, but here, he simply drags it down.
Then comes Prakash Raj, a seasoned actor known for his powerful screen presence and emotional intensity. But in "Jack," he goes completely overboard. His acting feels theatrical and unnecessarily loud. Instead of enhancing the emotional quotient of the movie, he becomes a source of irritation. His role is written in a way that is supposed to be impactful, maybe even heart-touching, but the execution is poor, and his overacting ruins whatever little potential the role had.
The storyline is another letdown. The film doesn't seem to have a clear direction. It tries to be a love story, a family drama, a self-discovery journey, and a commercial entertainer - all at once - but fails to excel in any department. The narrative is painfully predictable and lacks emotional depth. Scenes that are meant to be dramatic feel artificial and manipulative. There's no emotional hook to keep the audience invested.
Dialogues are bland and repetitive. Instead of making us think or feel, they often make us cringe. Attempts at humor fall flat. Even supposedly serious scenes feel unintentionally funny. It's almost like the writers forgot what emotion they were trying to convey in each scene.
The direction by Bommarillu Bhaskar is shockingly weak. Known for giving us heartfelt films like "Bommarillu" and "Parugu," one expects a certain emotional intelligence and sensitivity in his work. But "Jack" lacks any of that charm or maturity. The characters are one-dimensional, the screenplay is messy, and the pacing is painfully slow. Bhaskar seems to have lost his touch in connecting with the audience. It's hard to believe the same director who gave us Siddu and Genelia's lovable chemistry in "Bommarillu" has now directed this chaotic, soulless film.
Music and background score are forgettable. None of the songs stay with you. They appear randomly and often interrupt the flow of the story, which is already struggling. The background music tries to add emotion where the scenes fail but ends up sounding like a desperate attempt to force feelings onto the audience.
Cinematography is decent in parts, but there's nothing particularly unique or visually striking. The locations are standard, the framing lacks creativity, and the visuals do little to elevate the storytelling.
Editing is another weak point. Scenes linger for too long, transitions feel abrupt, and overall pacing is inconsistent. Some scenes could have easily been cut without affecting the story, while others needed better buildup.
Even the supporting cast is underutilized. The heroine's role is underwritten, and there is zero chemistry between the lead pair. The romantic track feels forced and rushed. There is no natural development of their relationship, making it hard to root for them.
If I had to sum it up, "Jack" is a film that had potential but is marred by poor execution on all fronts. It's a perfect example of how even talented directors can go off track when the basics are ignored. A good film starts with a good script, but here, everything feels half-baked.
As a viewer, I felt no emotional connection, no excitement, and certainly no satisfaction after watching this film. It tested my patience and made me appreciate the value of storytelling done right. I wouldn't recommend this movie to anyone, unless they're curious about how a film can go so wrong in so many ways.
In conclusion, "Jack" is a disaster of a film, made worse by bad acting, a weak story, and confused direction. Bommarillu Bhaskar may have taken a big risk with this one, but unfortunately, it didn't pay off. If anything, it serves as a reminder that name and experience alone can't save a film without heart and soul.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 41.738 $
- Laufzeit2 Stunden 13 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen