Siksa Kubur

Life after death is not a new story that has emerged around us. From the animist era (kejawen) of Semar's disappearance to the realm of virtue to the concept of heaven and hell in the religion of Abraham, we are attached to the belief to do self-moral as a form of devotion to God. Interestingly, this movie does not try to reflect on moral boundaries, but instead challenges the general concept of each belief without offending any party. From the beginning, we are brought into the movie feeling various sides of emotions and the impression of injustice for deep wounds. Leading us to be unsure of the direction of this movie. I personally did not feel a deep impact when watching this movie the first time. But realized that there was a hidden message being carried. Creating various question marks about the direction of this film. Realizing that many feel this film is good, but for me personally this film is less able to describe an explicit picture or traumatic impression in death itself. Which is the soul of the movie itself. I realized that the director (from some media interviews) did not delve into that area, from the beginning he tried to open new doors to create a space for discussion. For me, this is unacceptable because it seems selfish and will exclude ordinary viewers who don't really dig the absurdity. If I reflect on this movie, it is more suitable to be juxtaposed with films like Shutter Island (2010) or Seven (1995). But I appreciate that Jokan (as fans call him) remains consistent in bringing his world. Given that quite a lot of people are fanatical about his work. Various theories are proposed and concluded, but not many are satisfying for me. I would personally recommend this movie for anyone who wants to explore further the psychological sides of humans rather than looking for trivial fears that are widely peddled in most Indonesian films.

The film builds on a philosophy based on death, and in this way, it tries to scare you. It changes the plot frequently, and the surreal structure drags you from side to side, while also trying to make a point against institutional structures. The film reportedly has few gore scenes, but it tries to offset this with psychological thriller. While it did have some rather reactionary scenes, there were some that I found frustrating after a certain point, and the scenes were so repetitive that I couldn't figure out why they were so repetitive. But I don't think it's a bad film either, and the director was trying to make a point in a roundabout way.

Probably not the best Joko has produced as some have pointed out, but it's the most enjoyable to me so far. Pacing's good, not too fast, not too slow. The story's pretty understandable too, well at least 80% of it without the help of forum and discussion. Open to different interpretations? Yep, it's not Joko if it's not. Funny thing is, the movie doesn't feel like religious to me (from one particular religion) if you think it through, as it has a universal message of humans in the face of death as they lie dying rather than it is about people finding out one particular religion is right, or in other words: More psychological than religious, more human than supernatural, a spiritual journey and reflection about the end we're all gonna face one day, even for those who don't believe.

8.5/10.

Have you ever been in a group project where everyone had a good idea, but no one could agree on which one to use? That's exactly how this movie feels. While it does deliver some genuine scares (hence the bump to a 5), the overall direction is completely scattered. It feels like a college movie project gone off the rails.

This is not a 6/7-star horror movie like The Night House, A Dark Song, Session 9, Tigers Are Not Afraid, Huesera: The Bone Woman, or Lake Mungo (which I personally think deserve higher ratings, but are likely dragged down by non-horror fans). I suspect this film's rating may be inflated, possibly due to being more catered to a religious Indonesian audience.

It's worth a watch, but don't make it the main event for movie night. It's the kind of film you put on when you don't mind your friends talking during it. Or maybe the one you watch before diving into something really good.

Honestly, this movie would've worked better as an anthology. The number of different directions it tries to go in ends up being almost comedic at times.

Many people said, this film are like Christopher Nolan of Indonesia. But, sadly, Not!! There's too much people praising this film. "It's just like western movie" they said. "It's not about jump scare" or "It's more psychological film."

The atmosphere are great. The cinematography are good. The acting are top notch. That's the only positive things from this film.

The first half of the film is about our brave women, Sita. She try to find the truth about "Siksa Kubur" or Grave Torture. There's so much ideology battle, especially about religion through the film. Quite enjoyed it, yes, this "psychologycal" thing are so great.

Sadly, after that, when, Sita goes to the grave, it's became down hill! The ghosts are laughable. Why? Because it's literally more like alien, like Venom. And the other ghost just crawling in the wall like spiderman.

And there's literally Zombies in here! Just beat it, man!! Those old man zombies are not menancing enough!!

Many people said, the most "scary" scene are the washing machine scene. But, sorry, it's a big NO. Nothing scary, that's scene just make my eyes roll, because, it's soo dumb. They're literally in super rich nursing home, why the patient washed their clothes alone?? Yes, it's a part of "big twist" but too dumb.

And Sita suddenly became weak minded. She's a brave women like Spider-Woman or Katnis Everdreen from the get go, but why do that to her at the end?? Ugh.

They're claimed this film would make people "believe" about grave torture and repent. But at the end, i just thought, "did i watched some superhero movie"??