Ein hochtechnologischer Geheimdienstmitarbeiter, der mit einem Supercomputer-Mikrochip im Gehirn ausgestattet ist, unterstützt eine Cyber-Sicherheitsagentur der Regierung bei Sondermissionen... Alles lesenEin hochtechnologischer Geheimdienstmitarbeiter, der mit einem Supercomputer-Mikrochip im Gehirn ausgestattet ist, unterstützt eine Cyber-Sicherheitsagentur der Regierung bei Sondermissionen.Ein hochtechnologischer Geheimdienstmitarbeiter, der mit einem Supercomputer-Mikrochip im Gehirn ausgestattet ist, unterstützt eine Cyber-Sicherheitsagentur der Regierung bei Sondermissionen.
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Please CBS give this show the chance it and the cast deserves. This is a real good action, scifi show with some good humor thrown in.The Actors are really settling in to their roles can't wait for finale Monday. Would love to see it back on after Unforgettable has finale cause we almost lost that too which woulda sucked. Good time slot and shows would compliment each other in my life for years to come. Love CBS shows don't hurt me by removing good shows. You managed to steal Josh Holloway before any one else did Do not give him up.You got Marge back out there. Just like you kept my man who started as a real awesome vampire and is now Hawaii 50 favorite actor Alex O'Loughlin. I REALLY HOPE THIS GETS TO THOSE WHO MATTER AND THEY DO NOT CANCEL!
I'm another one who was really interested in the success of this show. It's lacking on a number of fronts, from writing to direction to technical accuracy. Fiction is one thing, but mixing up the simple facts of existing tech isn't forgivable.
Tech that doesn't exist yet is OK to go overboard with, but at least get current tech accurate.
From other shows, we've seen how good these actors are. So we know it's not their lack of ability.
There's a balance here that is way off kilter. To succeed, a show needs to overpower its weak points and compensate for the inadequacies, so there would be a net positive experience.
Taking a good concept, using modern tech and future tech, getting really good actors together in a vibrant team are all big positives.
The immature writing and direction outweigh all those positives. Then add in the failure to get good technical consulting and the show just can't win.
I so much wanted this to be a winner. What a letdown.
Tech that doesn't exist yet is OK to go overboard with, but at least get current tech accurate.
From other shows, we've seen how good these actors are. So we know it's not their lack of ability.
There's a balance here that is way off kilter. To succeed, a show needs to overpower its weak points and compensate for the inadequacies, so there would be a net positive experience.
Taking a good concept, using modern tech and future tech, getting really good actors together in a vibrant team are all big positives.
The immature writing and direction outweigh all those positives. Then add in the failure to get good technical consulting and the show just can't win.
I so much wanted this to be a winner. What a letdown.
I really liked the Intelligence pilot but, on the other hand, I also like Nikita, Alias, Covert Affairs, Person of Interest, Numb3rs, Burn Notice, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., Arrow, Tomorrow People, The Blacklist, Orphan Black, Torchwood, The Unit, Almost Human, Homeland, 24... basically, all shows about espionage or spies, either as part of the higher level government security agencies (often secret ones) or free agent spies, trying to combat sinister terrorist organizations, corrupt governments and evil multinational corporations, with individuals who frequently have enhanced abilities (knowledge, fighting skills or super powers).
So, this show is right up my alley. But the question isn't if Intelligence is good, it's is it good enough in 2014 to not be canceled? Will the plots and characters be distinctive enough to distinguish this show from many other series that have the same episodic structure and design? And this question just considers spy-oriented shows, this series also has similarities to cop shows like Elementary or even procedural crime series that are basically 60 minute mysteries with, often, a long- arc story tying the season together.
After just seeing the pilot, I like the characters (or, at least, the actors) well enough but for this show to succeed, it will really rely on the talent of the writers and production crew. Espionage shows already demand a great suspension of disbelief because they reside in a world of secrets and lies that are hidden from ordinary citizens. Viewers won't compare Intelligence to life but to other espionage series and whether the world it creates is consistent to the one we have come to know in similar shows.
Right now, besides a likable cast of actors, Intelligence is trying to distinguish itself through the premise that a computer chip implanted in his brain enables the Gabriel Vaughn character to somehow download every fact that exists anywhere online, even behind firewalls and, seemingly on hard drives as well. It's accepting this premise that seems to be the main dividing line in user reviews of whether people like or dislike this show. While visually, it's stunning to watch Gabriel "cyber-render" a scenario, this show will succeed or fail on whether this goes beyond science fiction into fantasy territory. Will viewers buy this?
The other factor is scheduling and Monday nights at 10 pm is a tough time slot with audience-pleaser Castle and the very promising The Blacklist as opposition. It's hard to see the mid-season Intelligence ranking anywhere other than #3 and it would be wise for CBS to move the series to a less competitive night like Wednesdays or, even Friday nights where it will be more likely to develop an audience. I see this program as one that people DVR and may (or may not) ever watch later. While other shows survive being second choice viewing, it's not a good place for a new series to start from.
Personally, I hope the series last more than 10 or 14 episodes and lasts to a second season, hopefully on a different night of the week.
So, this show is right up my alley. But the question isn't if Intelligence is good, it's is it good enough in 2014 to not be canceled? Will the plots and characters be distinctive enough to distinguish this show from many other series that have the same episodic structure and design? And this question just considers spy-oriented shows, this series also has similarities to cop shows like Elementary or even procedural crime series that are basically 60 minute mysteries with, often, a long- arc story tying the season together.
After just seeing the pilot, I like the characters (or, at least, the actors) well enough but for this show to succeed, it will really rely on the talent of the writers and production crew. Espionage shows already demand a great suspension of disbelief because they reside in a world of secrets and lies that are hidden from ordinary citizens. Viewers won't compare Intelligence to life but to other espionage series and whether the world it creates is consistent to the one we have come to know in similar shows.
Right now, besides a likable cast of actors, Intelligence is trying to distinguish itself through the premise that a computer chip implanted in his brain enables the Gabriel Vaughn character to somehow download every fact that exists anywhere online, even behind firewalls and, seemingly on hard drives as well. It's accepting this premise that seems to be the main dividing line in user reviews of whether people like or dislike this show. While visually, it's stunning to watch Gabriel "cyber-render" a scenario, this show will succeed or fail on whether this goes beyond science fiction into fantasy territory. Will viewers buy this?
The other factor is scheduling and Monday nights at 10 pm is a tough time slot with audience-pleaser Castle and the very promising The Blacklist as opposition. It's hard to see the mid-season Intelligence ranking anywhere other than #3 and it would be wise for CBS to move the series to a less competitive night like Wednesdays or, even Friday nights where it will be more likely to develop an audience. I see this program as one that people DVR and may (or may not) ever watch later. While other shows survive being second choice viewing, it's not a good place for a new series to start from.
Personally, I hope the series last more than 10 or 14 episodes and lasts to a second season, hopefully on a different night of the week.
I'm a big fan in general of spy dramas (counting "Nikita", "Covert Affairs", "Alias", and "Chuck" among my favourite TV shows), so maybe I was biased towards this show from the outset, but I found it to be a very enjoyable and solid spy show. It had somewhat of a slow start for me and I hope to see more from Meghan Ory's character, who I have a feeling has a lot more to give on this show, but I think I'll be with this series for the long haul, as it has a charismatic leading man in Josh Holloway, an attractive and gifted female lead in Ory, and a good supporting role for Marg Helgenberger.
I look forward to what this show has to offer in future episodes.
I look forward to what this show has to offer in future episodes.
A great show with a strong cast, a well implemented intriguing concept and fabulous action. I thoroughly enjoyed this, it will not win any awards, but it is an entertaining and enjoyable watch. Very disappointing that it was discontinued after only one season, there is plenty left to explore which could well have been even better than the first season.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesBased off the book, "Phoenix Island" by John Dixon
- VerbindungenFeatured in WatchMojo: Top 10 Animals That Are Now Extinct Because of Humans (2017)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Tri Tue Nhan Tao
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 16:9 HD
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen