IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,8/10
2628
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein brillanter Mathematikstudent an Frankreichs Spitzenuniversität, der Ecole Normale Supérieure.Ein brillanter Mathematikstudent an Frankreichs Spitzenuniversität, der Ecole Normale Supérieure.Ein brillanter Mathematikstudent an Frankreichs Spitzenuniversität, der Ecole Normale Supérieure.
- Auszeichnungen
- 4 Gewinne & 1 Nominierung insgesamt
Xiaoxing Cheng
- M. Kong
- (as Maurice Cheng)
Karl Ruben Noel
- Le danseur
- (as Karl-Ruben 'Rubix' Noël)
Pakirathan Sulakshan
- Le mathématicien
- (as Sulax Pakirat)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A movie about a semi-autistic young female mathematician struggling to fit into the society, with a happy end: she finds her boy and even succeeds in proving an uber-hard conjecture. In a sense, it's like Neo from The Matrix: started as an outcast but then saves the world and gets the girl (boy). The nerdy version of Cinderella plot.
As a movie, it's not that exciting. Simply because the math part would be impenetrable to the vast majority of the audience. So it's reduced to gibberish and meaningless math symbols on blackboards. Instead, the movie focuses on the social inadequacy: at the age of 25, the heroine is still dependent on her mom. She quits her math PhD after her first failure and tries to survive in the city by taking up random working-class jobs. When she's inevitably fired from those for disrespecting authority, she starts earning cash illegally from Mahjong gambling. In real life this would eventually land her in jail or on welfare or in an institution. But in this movie, she follows into Maria Curie's steps and finds love among fellow scientists. For a proper happy end, she also has to single-handedly solve a problem that hundreds of old bearded dudes failed at. Cheers to that.
For me this movie, despite its shortcomings, had a special touch because I am actually kinda like that girl myself. Well, I'm not autistic and I even had a successful business, but I'm still of that type in general. I'd say there are at least 8 times more men like this than there are women. So, guys would be unlikely to have a similar story. Simply because there are barely any girls to go around. Normally they just either stay alone, or have bad marriages/divorces or... I dunno... sell startups and buy trophy babes. Notice how just about every person around the heroine is a guy. That's accurate.
As a movie, it's not that exciting. Simply because the math part would be impenetrable to the vast majority of the audience. So it's reduced to gibberish and meaningless math symbols on blackboards. Instead, the movie focuses on the social inadequacy: at the age of 25, the heroine is still dependent on her mom. She quits her math PhD after her first failure and tries to survive in the city by taking up random working-class jobs. When she's inevitably fired from those for disrespecting authority, she starts earning cash illegally from Mahjong gambling. In real life this would eventually land her in jail or on welfare or in an institution. But in this movie, she follows into Maria Curie's steps and finds love among fellow scientists. For a proper happy end, she also has to single-handedly solve a problem that hundreds of old bearded dudes failed at. Cheers to that.
For me this movie, despite its shortcomings, had a special touch because I am actually kinda like that girl myself. Well, I'm not autistic and I even had a successful business, but I'm still of that type in general. I'd say there are at least 8 times more men like this than there are women. So, guys would be unlikely to have a similar story. Simply because there are barely any girls to go around. Normally they just either stay alone, or have bad marriages/divorces or... I dunno... sell startups and buy trophy babes. Notice how just about every person around the heroine is a guy. That's accurate.
I saw this movie about a month ago and had a privet debate with myself weather I should review it. The problem I had was, that as a movie - there's nothing out of the ordinary with it. It's well done the acting is of the highest quality, especially the lead, Ella Rumpf and Jean Pierre Darroussin, who plays her professor. But that's about it. Not amazingly bad not amazingly good, just a well-done movie.
But that's not all there is to a movie. It had one point that for me made it all worth my while. It's a story about a brilliant mathematician that manages to really reach her potential only when she comes to accept her emotional relation to math. We're all used to hear how science must be rational and detached from any sort of emotion. In fact, the idea is repeated a few times in the movie itself. Thing is, Marguerite sees math as the thing that keeps her world together, and as such she's very emotional about it. Without accepting that fact she can't really reach her potential, no matter how brilliant she is. And I just loved the way the movie made this point. For that reason alone, I rated it as I did, and for that reason I think it's a movie worth seeing.
But that's not all there is to a movie. It had one point that for me made it all worth my while. It's a story about a brilliant mathematician that manages to really reach her potential only when she comes to accept her emotional relation to math. We're all used to hear how science must be rational and detached from any sort of emotion. In fact, the idea is repeated a few times in the movie itself. Thing is, Marguerite sees math as the thing that keeps her world together, and as such she's very emotional about it. Without accepting that fact she can't really reach her potential, no matter how brilliant she is. And I just loved the way the movie made this point. For that reason alone, I rated it as I did, and for that reason I think it's a movie worth seeing.
It's a truth not quite universally acknowledged that films about hard intellectual or creative work, well, suck. I'm not sure if higher mathematics is particularly prone (all of Good Will Hunting except the Robin Williams bits; the -entirety- of A Beautiful Mind; everything but the facts of that Ramanujan film are at least as far removed as, say, Star Wars is and from astrophysics).
This, though, does not.
The central character is not a transcendent but flawed genius but hardworking and self-denying; the moments of inspiration (which are a real thing) look real and come through sheer effort, not effortless revelation with accompanying sound effects; and the scholarly politicking and casual STEM sexism are, well, true to life.
But - and this is probably burying the lede, sorry - it is also (1) splendid performances by all of the main cast; (2) a very thoughtful reflection on the connection between abstract thought and the human condition; and (3) an actually enjoyable film.
This, though, does not.
The central character is not a transcendent but flawed genius but hardworking and self-denying; the moments of inspiration (which are a real thing) look real and come through sheer effort, not effortless revelation with accompanying sound effects; and the scholarly politicking and casual STEM sexism are, well, true to life.
But - and this is probably burying the lede, sorry - it is also (1) splendid performances by all of the main cast; (2) a very thoughtful reflection on the connection between abstract thought and the human condition; and (3) an actually enjoyable film.
An interesting premise about mathematicians, solutions, experience, and autonomy with a strong lead performance from Ella Rumpf. Concepts about mathematicians and the solutions to solve them aren't something I am very familiar with but the idea of how it process is interesting. Filmmaker Anna Novion does a pretty good job on presenting the direction of the atmosphere, tone, and camerawork as there are some really interesting camera shots and presentations.
With good performances, Rumpf's performance as the main lead is pretty good as she presents an interesting, while at times, noisy, character study that is engaging to observe. Unfortunately, the fault of the movie lies on it's uneven narrative and themes approached. It's narrative explores some interesting concepts about errors and discovery but unfortunately, it lands onto some cliches that are boring and providing some side characters that have little development or engagement to connect with. Creating the movie to lose it's steam.
Nevertheless, for mathematician individuals, this movie will do good for the demographic.
With good performances, Rumpf's performance as the main lead is pretty good as she presents an interesting, while at times, noisy, character study that is engaging to observe. Unfortunately, the fault of the movie lies on it's uneven narrative and themes approached. It's narrative explores some interesting concepts about errors and discovery but unfortunately, it lands onto some cliches that are boring and providing some side characters that have little development or engagement to connect with. Creating the movie to lose it's steam.
Nevertheless, for mathematician individuals, this movie will do good for the demographic.
Despite familiar themes, the movie is well-made and avoids being overly dramatic. It is well worth watching and takes more after the movie 21 than 'Good Will Hunting' or 'A Beautiful Mind'. A very solid performance by Ella Rumpf (known from the movie "Raw") who portrays Marguerite. Starts a bit slow but if you bite the bullet and continue watching, you will be rewarded. Some plot twists are predictable (just like in the movie "21"), but others you will not see coming. The movie explores a common problem, talented young people who get discouraged when they realize success isn't guaranteed. Marguerite is a brilliant math student who crumbles when her big theorem turns out to be wrong. While the movie explores familiar territory (genius obsessed with proving themselves), it might not resonate with everyone unless you're really into number theory (a specific branch of mathematics). The film uses camera tricks to show how overwhelmed Marguerite feels and how she struggles to decide between her passion for math and the harsh realities of the world. I also loved the movie and the performances of Julien Frison (Lucas) and Sonia Bonny (Noa). But Ella Rumpf (Marguerite Hoffmann) takes the crown. Perfect casting for this role. Rated the movie 9/10 and well deserved. No need to say that this is a must see (despite the slow start).
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAccording to a NY Times article a reward of 1 million dollars was offered offered from 2000 to 2002. Currently there is no official monetary prize specifically for proving or disproving Goldbach's Conjecture similar to the prizes offered for some other famous problems, such as the Millennium Prize Problems.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Marguerite's Theorem?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- Marguerite's Theorem
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 2.870.000 € (geschätzt)
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.162.522 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 53 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
What is the Canadian French language plot outline for Die Gleichung ihres Lebens (2023)?
Antwort