Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAfter they investigate a supernatural force on Mars, the crew of a spaceship traveling back to Earth exhibits disturbing behavior.After they investigate a supernatural force on Mars, the crew of a spaceship traveling back to Earth exhibits disturbing behavior.After they investigate a supernatural force on Mars, the crew of a spaceship traveling back to Earth exhibits disturbing behavior.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Anthony J. Potter
- Travis
- (as Anthony Jan Potter)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Stupid time-waster. Everything about it is wrong. Childish Special effects and worse acting. Decor is about to fall apart. Actually it was clearly an ultra bad idea to put this movie on. Just as it was a real bad idea to even produce it. Why bother to throw away any budget on a just terrible piece of thrash like this one is. If you want to throw away even more energy and time on a real dumb and stupid movie be my guest just don't come complaining I didn't warn you in advance please because I hereby do. I fell asleep a couple of times and the rest of the time I declared myself dumb and stupid to not press STOP and drop the thing in the trashcan.
Good Premises
Red neck, bad real bad and way off base. Engineers smarter than you show. Smuggled alcohol wouldn't be out in the open. I've seen 18 year olds that are better at smuggling onto a Naval ship
Single person going out, NEVER, NASA uses military protocols. That means unknown threat 2 person team. We are talking tear in suit DEAD.
Tech working on gear, would have another person.
What it shows is a movie that could be good failing do to ignorance, bad research and biases without the curtesy to find out the basic procedures/protocols I can see the attempts at humor but they don't work. Your trying to force the humor and that never works You have to maintain your foundation.
NASA doesn't accept just anyone, your grease monkeys don't represent current Naval Engineering much less aviation. Cleanliness in MANDATORY For your information I have 24 years military service, worked on conventional, gas turbine, and nuclear power shipped. Have meant and known astronauts. Have lived in the Houston area and talked with those that work for NASA, since High School. I have friend that worked on the Hubble Telescope. Specialized in Computers and Communication equipment, Aviation and Warfare qualified, served on 5 US ships.
Sad when the potential for a good movie is ruined bad enough that I am making my first review.
Tech working on gear, would have another person.
What it shows is a movie that could be good failing do to ignorance, bad research and biases without the curtesy to find out the basic procedures/protocols I can see the attempts at humor but they don't work. Your trying to force the humor and that never works You have to maintain your foundation.
NASA doesn't accept just anyone, your grease monkeys don't represent current Naval Engineering much less aviation. Cleanliness in MANDATORY For your information I have 24 years military service, worked on conventional, gas turbine, and nuclear power shipped. Have meant and known astronauts. Have lived in the Houston area and talked with those that work for NASA, since High School. I have friend that worked on the Hubble Telescope. Specialized in Computers and Communication equipment, Aviation and Warfare qualified, served on 5 US ships.
Sad when the potential for a good movie is ruined bad enough that I am making my first review.
Indie filmmaker Michael Fredianelli takes off from his usual comfort zone of earth bound tough guy cinema to explore the final frontier with a sci-fi movie set mostly in space. This microbudget production is an impressive one and many of the visual effects utilized are jaw dropping especially when it comes to the indie arena. Of particular standout is the segment of the film depicting the Mars surface-- Sci-fi geeks will only recognize the familiar Agua Dulce terrain when they're done marveling at how skillful (if obviously exaggerated for effect) a recreation of the red planet the film achieves. It makes Mars seem truly frightening in all its desolate rocky and dusty landscape. Similarly, the movie makes the cold vacuum of space seem equally as vast and scary and borrows much from the look and feel from the Hollywood sci-fi classic Alien.
Well there is no denying the technical achievements on display with Ultra Red, its biggest problem is its script. It utilizes a plot that very much resembles Star Trek's The "Naked Time" and its Next Generation follow up "The Naked Now" and deals with an extraterrestrial substance that effects the brain similarly to alcohol. However the way the substance is discovered and delivered comes off clear as day as a rather clunky MacGuffin. Furthermore, there are other problems with believability. The crew of the spaceship (NASA no less) in the movie is comically unprofessional and it wasn't enough for the lead character to be a genius rover vehicle designer, but also a master thief with a rap sheet a mile long as well. Other times, the film's technobabble just comes off poorly developed like when we're told that a futuristic weapon operates on the same principle as said rover which itself is more clearly modeled after present day technology. Now, I'm no scientist, but elements like that read more as pure kayfabe to me and took me out of the movie a bit.
While it's highly ambitious and impressive in many facets as well as highly entertaining for much of its running time, Ultra Red stumbles in too many places to be a clear win and instead comes off as a rather mixed bag.
Well there is no denying the technical achievements on display with Ultra Red, its biggest problem is its script. It utilizes a plot that very much resembles Star Trek's The "Naked Time" and its Next Generation follow up "The Naked Now" and deals with an extraterrestrial substance that effects the brain similarly to alcohol. However the way the substance is discovered and delivered comes off clear as day as a rather clunky MacGuffin. Furthermore, there are other problems with believability. The crew of the spaceship (NASA no less) in the movie is comically unprofessional and it wasn't enough for the lead character to be a genius rover vehicle designer, but also a master thief with a rap sheet a mile long as well. Other times, the film's technobabble just comes off poorly developed like when we're told that a futuristic weapon operates on the same principle as said rover which itself is more clearly modeled after present day technology. Now, I'm no scientist, but elements like that read more as pure kayfabe to me and took me out of the movie a bit.
While it's highly ambitious and impressive in many facets as well as highly entertaining for much of its running time, Ultra Red stumbles in too many places to be a clear win and instead comes off as a rather mixed bag.
OK, full disclosure, I baled before the movie was ten minutes in.
The CGI is cringeworthy. The rover rolls its wheels straight through boulders. The gaseous alien is pixellated. The characters are straight out of a (bad) school drama assignment. The set dressing is as thin as tissue. The dialogue is painful.
The plot is wafer thin. The rover is broken. Only one man can repair it. He's in jail. He's a genius with the mental capacity of a cardboard box. He can learn to be an astronaut in 12 hours, from a guy who you wouldn't trust to punch the code into a carwash.
Seriously, if the rest of the movie is as bad as what I saw, it has stolen the crown from Plan 9 From Outer Space.
I need a lie down.
The CGI is cringeworthy. The rover rolls its wheels straight through boulders. The gaseous alien is pixellated. The characters are straight out of a (bad) school drama assignment. The set dressing is as thin as tissue. The dialogue is painful.
The plot is wafer thin. The rover is broken. Only one man can repair it. He's in jail. He's a genius with the mental capacity of a cardboard box. He can learn to be an astronaut in 12 hours, from a guy who you wouldn't trust to punch the code into a carwash.
Seriously, if the rest of the movie is as bad as what I saw, it has stolen the crown from Plan 9 From Outer Space.
I need a lie down.
I realise this is a low budget movie but some things are just inexcusable. If the budget is small then at least get the zero cost stuff right. The acting seems so wooden it's like a high school production, but this seems to mainly due to the script which appears to have written by someone who isn't quite up to the job. Maybe a proof reader with at least grade 8 English could have fixed it. It does not greatly add to the budget to give your actors lines that don't make them sound like idiots and making an actor sound like an idiot destroys the character's credibility.
You might have thought that when an actor is presented with a line like "We'd still need to necessitate cooperation with Jack Walker" (4:53) they might say, whoa, stop, this needs some fixing. But no, they just plough on and it just keeps getting worse. I gave up long before the end so maybe the second half gets better.
You might have thought that when an actor is presented with a line like "We'd still need to necessitate cooperation with Jack Walker" (4:53) they might say, whoa, stop, this needs some fixing. But no, they just plough on and it just keeps getting worse. I gave up long before the end so maybe the second half gets better.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerDuring the scene where a crew member has both his cheeks sliced open with a knife, there is oddly enough no blood gushing from these knife wounds.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen