Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.Durch den katastrophalen Rückfall ihres Adoptivsohns wird Lexi, eine Kleinstadtanwältin, mit der Realität des Unternehmensbetrugs auf höchster Ebene konfrontiert.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 15 wins total
Empfohlene Bewertungen
So compelling and of course disturbing. More evidence of intentional deception regarding childhood vaxxes. Even with the evidence presented, this case is still in the courts. The only complaint was a bit too much screen time on the main character's yoga moves! The striking lead actress became resolute and powerful as a lawyer and mother of an autistic child. I felt her strength but also her weariness. The most moving scene was the father witnessing the transformation in his son. The most inspiring part of the story is the courage of conviction lived out by real people. A rarity today! May truth prevail!
This film is successful in conveying the message because it brings the human element to the forefront. It is easy to make "public health" into a game of statistics. Protocol 7 keeps it human, almost all the time.
In her book "Oneness vs the 1%" Vandana Shiva has a term called "Ontological Schizophrenia" which refers to how people can simultaneously celebrate marvelous progressive inventions, drugs etc., while ignoring the desperate species-threatening aspects of the so-called "marvelous thing". The disparity between business and humanity is wonderfully conveyed in Protocol 7 and it is clear where the line of differentiation lands with Merck and their "moral chicanery." I left the theater inspired with hope for legal justice and angry that it has taken 10-years in litigation while the populace suffers and the snake-oil cadre wallows in luxury. This is a MUST SEE film and a must experience time. Another Home Run for Andy Wakefield and for those who choose to endure the weight of the subject in his artistry.
In her book "Oneness vs the 1%" Vandana Shiva has a term called "Ontological Schizophrenia" which refers to how people can simultaneously celebrate marvelous progressive inventions, drugs etc., while ignoring the desperate species-threatening aspects of the so-called "marvelous thing". The disparity between business and humanity is wonderfully conveyed in Protocol 7 and it is clear where the line of differentiation lands with Merck and their "moral chicanery." I left the theater inspired with hope for legal justice and angry that it has taken 10-years in litigation while the populace suffers and the snake-oil cadre wallows in luxury. This is a MUST SEE film and a must experience time. Another Home Run for Andy Wakefield and for those who choose to endure the weight of the subject in his artistry.
What an interesting topic and something I would have never thought about looking into. I'm so glad I did!
This movie is a must see if you plan to have children, even if you're not planning to have children I would strongly suggest watching this movie to expand your knowledge.
If you have the opportunity to see it in the theater jump at it! At the end of the movie there's a QR code that I was able to scan for additional information at the protocol7.movie website. I also signed up to the news letter to receive the latest news and updates as I'm eagerly awaiting for the ability to stream the movie and to share it with friends and family.
This movie is a must see if you plan to have children, even if you're not planning to have children I would strongly suggest watching this movie to expand your knowledge.
If you have the opportunity to see it in the theater jump at it! At the end of the movie there's a QR code that I was able to scan for additional information at the protocol7.movie website. I also signed up to the news letter to receive the latest news and updates as I'm eagerly awaiting for the ability to stream the movie and to share it with friends and family.
I thought the acting was outstanding. If you have been vaccine injured or have a family member in that position there will be some part which resonates no matter whether it was the MMR as in this story, or another vax (or redefined vax). Family relationships and the effects vaccine injuries have on the family dynamic for those who are living the hell caused by fraudulent motives of Pharmaceutical companies to make money no matter the cost to physical health is especially moving. True to life because it's based on a whistleblowers evidence. I wish it had been able to show the outcomes on company employees who messed up.
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
Well done Mr. Wakefield and cast! 👍
I had a view of the inside seat in 2002 when Wakefield was sacked for his findings. It looked very much like a hit job on him to avoid him ruining a multi-billion dollar income stream for pharmaceutical companies.
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
Despite the mainstream media's continued comments that Wakefield's work was fraudulent, it was in fact supported by several other independent studies. But when they saw what happened they shut these down.
Anyone criticising vaccines is "anti-science" but as a scientist I can't find robust science supporting them? Perhaps that's what happens when you have a billion dollar product which you can't be sued on if anything goes wrong. (US Government law protects vaccine producers from being sued on vaccines)
Every company that produces vaccines also has a drug side of their business where they can be sued. They have all been sued billions of dollars in the drug side of the business for malpractice. So obvious question is: how much more care and attention are they putting in the side of the business they can't be sued in versus that which they can be?
Wusstest du schon
- Zitate
Josh Koprowski: [from trailer] No one will ever believe them again.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Protocol-7?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Protocol-7
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 38 Min.(98 min)
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.00 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen