[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
Episodenguide
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

Yes, Prime Minister

  • Fernsehserie
  • 2013
  • Not Rated
  • 30 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
5,5/10
618
IHRE BEWERTUNG
BELIEBTHEIT
4.479
7.591
Henry Goodman and David Haig in Yes, Prime Minister (2013)
SatireKomödie

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe modern version of British comedy 'Yes, Prime Minister'.The modern version of British comedy 'Yes, Prime Minister'.The modern version of British comedy 'Yes, Prime Minister'.

  • Hauptbesetzung
    • David Haig
    • Henry Goodman
    • Chris Larkin
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    5,5/10
    618
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    BELIEBTHEIT
    4.479
    7.591
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • David Haig
      • Henry Goodman
      • Chris Larkin
    • 25Benutzerrezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Episoden6

    Folgen durchsuchen
    HöchsteAm besten bewertet1 Jahreszeit2016

    Fotos6

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung14

    Ändern
    David Haig
    David Haig
    • Prime Minister James Hacker
    • 2013
    Henry Goodman
    Henry Goodman
    • Sir Humphrey Appleby
    • 2013
    Chris Larkin
    Chris Larkin
    • Bernard Woolley
    • 2013
    Zoe Telford
    Zoe Telford
    • Claire Sutton
    • 2013
    Sam Dastor
    Sam Dastor
    • Kumranistan Ambassador
    • 2013
    Tim Wallers
    Tim Wallers
    • Simon Chester
    • 2013
    Chandrika Chevli
    • Reporter
    • 2013
    Sevan Stephan
    • Mr. Aitikeev
    • 2013
    Ilan Goodman
    • TV Reporter
    • 2013
    Robbie Coltrane
    Robbie Coltrane
    • Rory McAlister
    • 2013
    Sara Carver
    Sara Carver
    • Robin Simpson
    • 2013
    Sophie Raworth
    • Newsreader
    • 2013
    Pip Torrens
    Pip Torrens
    • Jeremy Burnham
    • 2013
    Chris Fawkes
    • Weatherman
    • 2013
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen25

    5,5618
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    2flyingthor

    How did they get this so wrong?

    I always thought that I'd be moved to write my first review on IMDb because a movie/TV show was so amazing I'd have to share my feelings on it. Alas, twas not to be. I've just finished watching the 6 episodes of this reboot, I'm utterly disappointed and more than a little annoyed.

    Other reviewers are right to mention that sometimes a person can like an original so much that any replication of it will never come close in their eyes. There may be a little of that coming into play with me, but I tried to keep an open mind when I started episode one having heard little else about this production other than it was being made, and who the PM would be. When I realised who was writing it I began to get excited, perhaps some of the magic of the original would find its way into this modern version, but then I noticed that this version was based on the play and not the original radio/TV show which I found curious. I've never seen any stage productions of Yes Minister/Prime Minister but assumed that if it was using something close to the original scripts and was going in a similar direction then it would surely come close to the high standard set in the 1980's. After seeing Gold's reboot of it I'm not as sure! The acting is laughable in all the wrong ways, the casting was all wrong; Zoe Telford does a poor job in her role, the modern Sir Appleby isn't convincing enough to play the role of Hackers nemesis, and the guy they cast for Bernard just looks terribly out of place. Haig does an OK job as Prime Minister I guess, but was still a source of annoyance for me. Overacting, poorly delivered lines, bad camera work, rehashed gags and the overall plot of the six episodes all came together to make for one hell of an insult to the original cast and fans.

    I find it bizarre that the producers of the reboot didn't notice this, or even some of the programme directors at Gold. I can only assume that they may not have been as familiar with the original as they thought, that or they were trying to distance themselves from the original in an effort to modernise it for today's audience. If this was the case then I believe it was a huge error to take yesterdays characters and put them into today's world, it just didn't work, even giving the rehashed characters new identities may have made it more bearable for me. When the conditions are right a show can be timeless. Perfect casting, natural acting, quality writing and respect for its audience. The original Yes Minister show had all these things. The relationship between Jim Hacker and Humphry Abbleby was nothing less than genius, the two actors played so perfectly off each other it never gets old. In all of the episodes that were released I never once thought that any character that made an appearance, no matter how small, was out of place or unnecessary, they all brought something to the plot that made it that little bit funnier and more plausible. Each and every story in the original could be applied to today and still be relevant; the relationship between politicians and the civil service will never change, there's always some country somewhere in crisis, always under the table deals going on at national level, still the same old frictions within the EU.....The problem with the reboot is that they took the characters from the original but none of the quality, and seemed to spend more time trying to make Hackers character look like a buffoon than trying to be humorous overall. Hacker was never an idiot, he mightn't have been at Appleby's level intellectually, something which Appleby delighted in quite often, but an idiot he was not.

    In short, if you are a fan of the original I wouldn't recommend this show, give the original another spin instead, something which I will be doing after posting this. If you've never seen the original then make sure you watch that first, watching this failed attempt first could ruin it for you.
    1jazz_jeff

    Don't bother viewing - simply terrible in every way.

    Other reviews have said it all nearly. This remake of a great classic show is a waste of TV time and it a total let down. The comedy - what little there is - is very poor. That's partly down to the very dire writing and the rehashing of material that simply is out of date. The actors in it are wasted. They have poor material and although at times maybe trying their best, they peacefully fight a lost cause.

    I loved the original and was willing to view any new series with the notion that it must stand on its own also and not just be judged on its previous history and calibre of shows. On its own sadly, it really fails - clearly without a doubt - in a lot of ways. Other reviews have covered the reasons why and in detail. I cannot disagree in any way, shape or form.

    ...And that's a shame. At the start of once hope - there was only bitter disappointment in its wake.
    7snshami

    Made me laugh out aloud more times than I can remember having done so recently

    This show has a serious problem. It has to overcome our memories of the first series. The main reason for this is that they used the same names for most of the characters. The series is set in the current era and there seem to be several plot ideas that have carried over from the original series. In truth except for Zoe Telford none of the new characters measure up to the Brilliant originals. I don't think there was every any hope that was going to happen. The original cast of characters were absolutely perfect in every way. Everyone knows one cannot improve on perfection

    As a consequence I spent the first episode comparing the new with the old and feeling quite a bit let down. If I had to rate this series based on just the first episode it would not have rated better than four or five.

    Even putting the disappointment caused by the characters aside the first episode is really not that great. The only reason I watched the second episode was because I was stuck on a plane and bored and consequently desperate.

    Episode 2 was much better than the first. The actors start loosening up a bit. It was almost like someone had given them a real talking to after the first.

    Episode three onwards is seriously funny. In fact I really cannot remember laughing so much recently. Was it better than the first, no that is not possible. But it was really good comedy, nevertheless.

    The best character is Claire Sutton played by the gorgeous Zoe Telford. The worst is probably Sir Humphrey. He just isn't that beguiling and charming, manipulative and Machieavellian character that he was in the original series. In fact he is quite wooden and doesn't appear to lead the show.

    Still the main purpose of a comedy is to make you laugh. If you loosen up and can let go of the past you will enjoy it, quite a bit. If only they had changed the characters' names it would have been seen as a really good show in its own right.
    2duncan-holding-770-188063

    complete rubbish, Goodman miscast and Haig overacts AGAIN

    This show should never have been brought back.The original series was superb with wonderful performances from Paul Eddington and Nigel Hawthorne supported by Derek Fowlds. this is just a farce with Henry Goodman miscast and completely ruined by David Haig playing exactly the same character he has made a living so doing since the thin blue line nearly 20 years ago. The man chronically overacts and makes the character look stupid and inept. At least in the original The writers got away with the Hacker character in the role of Prime Minister. There is no way on earth you can believe David Haig is the PM. Please let me remember the program for what it was.
    philip-challis1

    WORSE THAN BAD

    Back in the eighties the original series was a masterpiece but this if you imagine a few years after The Mona Lisa was painted and everyone praised it Da Vinci says it needs improving and draws a moustache on it people would think that he was mad, well Anthony Jay has done the equivalent. This is dreadful he did a stage version which was even worse.

    Mehr wie diese

    Yes, Premierminister
    8,6
    Yes, Premierminister
    Yes Minister
    8,6
    Yes Minister
    Yes, Minister!
    6,9
    Yes, Minister!
    Blackadder - Dritter Teil
    8,6
    Blackadder - Dritter Teil
    The Thick of It: Der Intrigantenstadl
    8,7
    The Thick of It: Der Intrigantenstadl
    5,8
    Yes, Prime Minister: Re-elected
    Only Fools and Horses....
    9,0
    Only Fools and Horses....
    Blackadder - Zweiter Teil
    8,6
    Blackadder - Zweiter Teil
    Ally McBeal
    6,9
    Ally McBeal
    King of Queens
    7,4
    King of Queens
    Alle lieben Raymond
    7,3
    Alle lieben Raymond
    Frasier
    6,8
    Frasier

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Verbindungen
      Featured in Yes, Prime Minister: Re-elected (2013)

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ

    • How many seasons does Yes, Prime Minister have?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • 3. März 2016 (Deutschland)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigtes Königreich
    • Offizieller Standort
      • GOLD (United Kingdom)
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Tak, panie premierze
    • Produktionsfirma
      • British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      30 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Stereo
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 16:9 HD

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeitenFolge hinzufügen

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.