Eine Sache des Glaubens

Originaltitel: A Matter of Faith

2014
6
1 Std. 29 Min.

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

3,7/10

1776

IHRE BEWERTUNG

A young girl is influenced by her popular Biology professor, who teaches that evolution is the answer to the origins of life. Very concerned about his daughter drifting away from the faith, her father tries to do something about it.

trailer wiedergeben1:36

1 Video

3 Fotos

Drama

Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA young girl is influenced by her popular Biology professor, who teaches that evolution is the answer to the origins of life. Very concerned about his daughter drifting away from the faith, ... Alles lesenA young girl is influenced by her popular Biology professor, who teaches that evolution is the answer to the origins of life. Very concerned about his daughter drifting away from the faith, her father tries to do something about it.A young girl is influenced by her popular Biology professor, who teaches that evolution is the answer to the origins of life. Very concerned about his daughter drifting away from the faith, her father tries to do something about it.

Regie
- Rich Christiano
Drehbuch
- Dave Christiano
- Rich Christiano
Hauptbesetzung

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

IMDb-BEWERTUNG

3,7/10

1776

IHRE BEWERTUNG

Regie
- Rich Christiano
Drehbuch
- Dave Christiano
- Rich Christiano
Hauptbesetzung

Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro

Videos1

Trailer 1:36

Trailer

Fotos2

Benutzerrezensionen71

3,71.7K

Empfohlene Bewertungen

1jcbjb-76375

this is a story of a brain washed girl going to college and starting to think for herself but then daddy steps in and tries to stop her from thinking

This movie not only had horrible acting but ultimately was created as propaganda for the creationists it badly represents science and does not accurately portray the issue. Believing in young earth creationism is basically a denial of all of science evolution has the DNA evidence and the fossil record and more evidence. Basic geology and radiometric dating show the earth is indeed 4.5 billions of years old. The science side in this movie was portrayed as if science doesn't have any evidence so ultimately making this film creationist propaganda. I watched this expecting the same old regurgitation of the same refuted creationism arguments but they didn't even do that they just made science look like it is a bunch of guess work.what is sad is there are people out there that deny the massive amounts of scientific evidence supporting evolution, the age of the earth, the big bang etc... Overall a sad pathetic movie that ultimately was created to get people to believe in pseudoscience.

1cawigderowitz

Baptist creationist propaganda

This is most absolute rubbish propaganda film through Regret having paid £4 pounds to watch it, mislead by the resume. It's not a debate it's propaganda AVOID IT

1lallejelvin

worst manipulative lying piece of garbage

God Awful

this was one of the worst garbage movies I've ever seen in my entire life. it manipulates and tries to force feed the viewer with lies. don't watch it unless u cant think for yourself and need to validate your faith with false statements and a feel good atmosphere.

if you do watch it, be prepared to almost cringe at times because of the way christians are portrayed as good vs the evil atheists, its enough to almost make you vomit. i assume that there are some hardcore Christian fundamentalists who would enjoy this movie, but for the common man you should avoid it at all costs.

4sgcamil-94883

Unsubstantiated Fundamentalist Propaganda

A poor production pandering to narrow minded views on Creation. A disservice to Christianity itself.

4nysalesman-80790

Too Preachy Little to No Substance

As a Christian, ex-track runner, and scientist who believes in intelligent design; I would say that this movie misses on both sides of the aisle. If done right, then this movie could have been eye-opening. However, the writers know nothing about evolution or intelligent design. As a result, they have devolved this movie into a preaching contest. When will the Christians that make this movie realize that self-righteous preaching does not bring people to God but turns them in the other direction?

Suffice it to say that haters (and so called scientists) who exaggerate the true scientific merit of the theory of evolution to ban the teaching of an alternative theory like intelligent design are just as wrong as Christians who banned the teaching of evolution prior to Scopes-Monkey. In real science, all theories are allowed into the arena and to stand the test of scrutiny.

Mehr wie diese

5,3

Time Changer

7,0

Play the Flute

6,4

Bedingungslos geliebt

6,4

6,8

6,5

4,6

4,6

4,6

6,5

6,6

4,9

Handlung

Ändern

Wusstest du schon

Ändern

Wissenswertes
Last screen appearance of Harry Anderson before his death in April 2018.

Patzer
When Steven Whitaker makes his statement about Creationism not being taught to the administrator, the administrator states that Evolution is taught in all public schools as the answer to the origin of life. This is not true, no public or private school teaches that Evolution is the origin of life, rather it is taught that Evolution is the reason we see so many different types of life.

Zitate
Stephen Whitaker: I guess my first question for you, Professor Kaman, and the most important one I can think of is: how do you explain away God?
Professor Kaman: Explain away?
Stephen Whitaker: Yes, what about God?
Professor Kaman: Simply put, man created God.
Stephen Whitaker: Man created God?
Professor Kaman: I am 100% with Freud on this one, sir.
Stephen Whitaker: That man created God?
Professor Kaman: Dr. Sigmund Freud brilliantly observed many years ago that man is riddled with deep seated fears living as he does in a world of disease and famine and disaster with very little control over his circumstance. So yes, he created God. He postulated a being who could deliver him. Kind of life a supernatural sky hook that could pull him out of trouble. Man also believed that he was getting a raw deal from just about everybody so he wanted a cosmic umpire, to blow the big whistle and halt the game until everybody got what they deserved. But most of all, man fears death and extinction, and so he needed a heavenly father, who could take him at the end to some heavenly place that he decided to call heaven, all because he couldn't face the fact that eventually he was going to vanish from existence.
Stephen Whitaker: So, what's the purpose of life, Professor Kaman?
Professor Kaman: We live, and then we die and go back in the earth. That's it, there's no afterlife. Face the music, Mr. Whitaker. Elvis is dead, he's left the building. In this life, we get a chance to make a mark. If we do that, maybe the next generation will remember us, maybe we'll even teach them something but there is no afterlife.
Stephen Whitaker: I believe there is much more than that.
Professor Kaman: Yeah, you believe, Mr. Whitaker but do you have any proof of an afterlife?
Stephen Whitaker: Proof?
Professor Kaman: Proof. Scientific proof. Any kind of proof?
Stephen Whitaker: The Bible says we believe by faith.
Professor Kaman: Faith in what? In a God we can't see and a book we can't rely on? I'd like a little scientific proof.
Stephen Whitaker: I can't offer scientific proof.
Professor Kaman: Well, the words in this book that you hold so sacred, how do you even know they're true?
Stephen Whitaker: The Bible is very trustworthy.
Professor Kaman: I didn't ask if it was trustworthy. I asked if it was true.
Stephen Whitaker: The Bible is the word of God.
Professor Kaman: Wasn't the Bible written by men?
Stephen Whitaker: Yes, it was.
Professor Kaman: Then how does that make it the word of God?
Stephen Whitaker: Look, I can't explain it.
Professor Kaman: So, you're betting your afterlife on a book you can't explain about a God you can't prove. I am sticking with Freud on this one, Mr. Whitaker. I am definitely sticking with Freud.