IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,9/10
7083
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Simon Templar ist "The Saint", ein moderner Robin Hood, der das Geld von den Reichen nimmt und es, zusammen mit seiner wunderschönen Partnerin, an die Armen verteilt. Doch in seinem jüngsten... Alles lesenSimon Templar ist "The Saint", ein moderner Robin Hood, der das Geld von den Reichen nimmt und es, zusammen mit seiner wunderschönen Partnerin, an die Armen verteilt. Doch in seinem jüngsten Coup ist der Einsatz ungleich höher!Simon Templar ist "The Saint", ein moderner Robin Hood, der das Geld von den Reichen nimmt und es, zusammen mit seiner wunderschönen Partnerin, an die Armen verteilt. Doch in seinem jüngsten Coup ist der Einsatz ungleich höher!
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Roger Moore
- Jasper
- (as Sir Roger Moore)
Samantha Hanratty
- Zoe Valecross
- (as Sammi Hanratty)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
First of all let me start by saying i think the really bad reviews on this are a little uncalled for. I actually enjoyed it and it was good to see Roger Moore the original saint in it if only for 1 minute, and Ian Ogilvie who played the return of the Saint in a more substantial role' Give it a try and judge the movie for yourselves, don't take my word or anyone else's word.
Accept this for what it is- a failed television pilot with added scenes added to pad it out to movie length.
The main reason this never made it to series has to be Eliza Dushku. She is a "black hole" that causes all action to stop any time she is on camera. She behaves as if she is heavily medicated -- delivering each and every line with the same flat monotone. I wonder why any performer with such a severely limited range can have a career even in Hollywood.
The other major failing here is with the basic plot. It is about as generic as possible, Absolutely nothing in this film is even remotely new or fresh -- it all has a "seen this all before many many times" aspect to it.
The main reason this never made it to series has to be Eliza Dushku. She is a "black hole" that causes all action to stop any time she is on camera. She behaves as if she is heavily medicated -- delivering each and every line with the same flat monotone. I wonder why any performer with such a severely limited range can have a career even in Hollywood.
The other major failing here is with the basic plot. It is about as generic as possible, Absolutely nothing in this film is even remotely new or fresh -- it all has a "seen this all before many many times" aspect to it.
and if you can give them a giant leeway- perhaps they'd get better over the next year, you could enjoy this. But my God, the last scene, him hiding behind a tree just makes you groan! Can anything scream stupid more than that? I've only seen a few of the original TV show, listened to every dang old radio show- starring Vincent Price, but this is not the Saint. It's some spy dude. And it falls into the same traps every other US (and who knows maybe the world) TV show does, for example, you have a female computer expert, who is not the Saint hence not the star, and when the expert is flummoxed, you have to have the Saint, the star, give a suggestion that even a computer novice like me would know, and the computer expert says something like "Good idea, I didn't think of that." I mean it's really something stupid like "Did you turn it off then on again?" But then, every mystery show does that. They're filled with idiot "experts" that the star has to suggest things to. Plus, some of the dialog is just so stupid. It treats the viewer as an idiot. But who knows, if you can ignore the books, the radio shows, the original TV show and it got non-insulting intelligent writers then maybe this could have been a show worth wasting an hour on. Not a whole-hearted endorsement.
I love The Saint and often watch several episodes at a time. From the 1962 black & white and into the colour versions finishing 1969. I enjoy them all but there is no way you could make a new version of this show because it was of it's time. Today you can't go around saving ladies from danger and being a Gentleman Adventurer, it is just not believable in today's world so he required a purpose. It is stylishly shot but does lack the glamour of the original, probably down to the fact it started as a TV show then made into a movie.. They even sort of had a slight update on the theme tune occasionally playing in scenes. One of the reviewers said the years haven't been kind to Roger Moore, he was 89 and I would like to know if any of us are going to weather that many years as well.
As a stand alone 2017 update it is OK and I will leave it at that.
RIP Roger and thanks for all the marvellous entertainment you have given me and my Dad over the years.
As a stand alone 2017 update it is OK and I will leave it at that.
RIP Roger and thanks for all the marvellous entertainment you have given me and my Dad over the years.
Well, I take that back. I wasn't crazy about Val Kilmer.
I loved George Sanders, Louis Hayward, Ian Ogilvy and Roger Moore as The Saint. Since this version featured two ex-saints, Ogilvy and Moore, I wanted to see it.
Yikes.
This is a TV movie, and if you've been having trouble sleeping, this is just the thing. What a slow-moving bore replete with flashbacks of little Simon and the past life of his assistant (Eliza Dushku). And next to no plot.
Ian Ogilvy looked awful -- someone said here Moore looked awful - give the man a break - he was in his mid-'80s (this was made in 2013 as a TV pilot and was not picked up - what a shock). No one is dazzling forever.
Lots of karate-type moves. That's about it. At an hour and a half, it felt like Birth of a Nation.
Simon Rayner didn't excite me, although I'm sure he's very good in other films. But what could one expect from him, no doubt trying to stay awake.
I loved George Sanders, Louis Hayward, Ian Ogilvy and Roger Moore as The Saint. Since this version featured two ex-saints, Ogilvy and Moore, I wanted to see it.
Yikes.
This is a TV movie, and if you've been having trouble sleeping, this is just the thing. What a slow-moving bore replete with flashbacks of little Simon and the past life of his assistant (Eliza Dushku). And next to no plot.
Ian Ogilvy looked awful -- someone said here Moore looked awful - give the man a break - he was in his mid-'80s (this was made in 2013 as a TV pilot and was not picked up - what a shock). No one is dazzling forever.
Lots of karate-type moves. That's about it. At an hour and a half, it felt like Birth of a Nation.
Simon Rayner didn't excite me, although I'm sure he's very good in other films. But what could one expect from him, no doubt trying to stay awake.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesFilmed in 2013, it was not picked up for a series.
- PatzerThe gold bricks featured near the start are clearly nothing like the real weight of gold. They should have gone with gold-painted lead.
- VerbindungenRemake of Simon Templar (1962)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 31 Min.(91 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen