IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,8/10
1121
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Sechs Monate nach dem Ausbruch haben ein Mann und eine Frau überlebt, indem sie sich in einer abgelegenen Kabine isoliert haben. Sie sind hungrig nach Ressourcen und müssen sich den Schrecke... Alles lesenSechs Monate nach dem Ausbruch haben ein Mann und eine Frau überlebt, indem sie sich in einer abgelegenen Kabine isoliert haben. Sie sind hungrig nach Ressourcen und müssen sich den Schrecken stellen, die sie von außen und von innen bedrohen.Sechs Monate nach dem Ausbruch haben ein Mann und eine Frau überlebt, indem sie sich in einer abgelegenen Kabine isoliert haben. Sie sind hungrig nach Ressourcen und müssen sich den Schrecken stellen, die sie von außen und von innen bedrohen.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I hosted this to my friends on #Splatterday. It was well received. The set design and wardrobe make sense. The tension mounts as you get flashbacks of the apocalypse. The film is set more as a stage play and the undercurrents of the relationship rip though the film as in life. Sure, it may seem like a slow burn but the feelings and paranoia keep you on your seat. It has some gore and horrific imagery but if you are a fan like me, you will appreciate it. For the tiny budget, and limited release I applaud the film makers. They did a really great job with very little. It's definitely worth a watch. Premiered ar FrightFest UK in 2014.
I could've made this movie from my bedroom. The story was somewhat interesting but was executed in a very bad bad way. It could be much better but the director only focus on One thing which is so not important. I mean, we get it!! The audiences have sense. For instance, if you want make a movie is about people taking showers is important, you really don't have to make a whole movie showing shower scene only. You can just watch the first 10 minutes and the last 10 minutes, trust me you won't miss anything. Or you can just fast forward. If anyone would try to copy the movie's concept and make a short video on youtube, all you have to do just lock yourself in your room for couple days I believe it will be more fun to watch than this movie.
Wow, was I watching the same movie?
First off, everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I can't believe the previous users and reviews are calling this movie boring, slow, or that they have seen it before.
I thought the movie was suspenseful the entire time. Even though it was a limited cast, the acting was spot on and exactly what I look for in this genre.
If you want gore and nudity, you are looking in the wrong place, go re-watch one of the installments of Friday the 13th, which are all the same, so take your pick.
ALSO THIS ISN'T A ZOMBIE MOVIE!
The poster may be perceived as misleading, but we all should be able to get past that.
It could be just about anything outside the door, just like Cabin in the Woods. It's a sad story about two people who have lost everything. It frankly, was a lot more believable to me.
It's more like Open Water than Dawn of the Dead or Evil Dead.
I also really enjoyed discovering the prequel web series AFTER I had watched the film, it was a nice extension of the piece and hope they continue to post more episodes on the site.
First off, everyone's entitled to their opinion, but I can't believe the previous users and reviews are calling this movie boring, slow, or that they have seen it before.
I thought the movie was suspenseful the entire time. Even though it was a limited cast, the acting was spot on and exactly what I look for in this genre.
If you want gore and nudity, you are looking in the wrong place, go re-watch one of the installments of Friday the 13th, which are all the same, so take your pick.
ALSO THIS ISN'T A ZOMBIE MOVIE!
The poster may be perceived as misleading, but we all should be able to get past that.
It could be just about anything outside the door, just like Cabin in the Woods. It's a sad story about two people who have lost everything. It frankly, was a lot more believable to me.
It's more like Open Water than Dawn of the Dead or Evil Dead.
I also really enjoyed discovering the prequel web series AFTER I had watched the film, it was a nice extension of the piece and hope they continue to post more episodes on the site.
I ended up hating it.
I saw the low ratings and decided to give it a shot anyway. It's the kind of movie that has the potential to give us situational horror instead of just another gore-fest. I like character driven movies if they can deliver compelling characters and an interesting story. Sadly Dead Within just doesn't deliver. On any front.
As another reviewer mentions: It isn't a Zombie flick. He's right. It is the result of somebody having the idea to make a Zombie movie but not having any real cash to spend. Basically: "We can't afford the costs of having a horde of Zombies in our movie so we will basically shoot most of it in one small set with only 2 actors, and the story will be about the people trying to survive and not about the Zombies."
Unfortunately the creators of this micro-budgeted waste of time make the same mistakes as so many other low-budget filmmakers: They seem to have hired actors because they would work cheap instead of hiring them because they can act.
I don't want to mislead you into thinking that the acting is the only bad component of this movie though. The direction and editing are lousy too. Camera-work is not terrible but it certainly doesn't add anything to the viewing experience. It's shaky and hand-held low-budget stuff. The writing, if you can call it that is unoriginal and tells a disjointed story with way too many flashbacks. The ending is pretty much NOT a surprise. Despite having four credited writers, two of them being the lead actors, it feels mostly improvised. There isn't much in the way of special effects and what there is is pretty amateur. The "Zombies" are basically people with black contacts. Those contacts, some gauze and some black "blood" that looks like used motor oil are the majority of the makeup effects.
The only bright light in the whole sorry effort is the sound. It SOUNDS creepy.
2 out of 10
I saw the low ratings and decided to give it a shot anyway. It's the kind of movie that has the potential to give us situational horror instead of just another gore-fest. I like character driven movies if they can deliver compelling characters and an interesting story. Sadly Dead Within just doesn't deliver. On any front.
As another reviewer mentions: It isn't a Zombie flick. He's right. It is the result of somebody having the idea to make a Zombie movie but not having any real cash to spend. Basically: "We can't afford the costs of having a horde of Zombies in our movie so we will basically shoot most of it in one small set with only 2 actors, and the story will be about the people trying to survive and not about the Zombies."
Unfortunately the creators of this micro-budgeted waste of time make the same mistakes as so many other low-budget filmmakers: They seem to have hired actors because they would work cheap instead of hiring them because they can act.
I don't want to mislead you into thinking that the acting is the only bad component of this movie though. The direction and editing are lousy too. Camera-work is not terrible but it certainly doesn't add anything to the viewing experience. It's shaky and hand-held low-budget stuff. The writing, if you can call it that is unoriginal and tells a disjointed story with way too many flashbacks. The ending is pretty much NOT a surprise. Despite having four credited writers, two of them being the lead actors, it feels mostly improvised. There isn't much in the way of special effects and what there is is pretty amateur. The "Zombies" are basically people with black contacts. Those contacts, some gauze and some black "blood" that looks like used motor oil are the majority of the makeup effects.
The only bright light in the whole sorry effort is the sound. It SOUNDS creepy.
2 out of 10
The script for this movie was probably excellent, the execution should have been taken out and shot. The movie is about a pandemic of some sort leaving a couple isolated and trapped in a remote cabin in the woods while it unfolds. When I say unfolds I use the term loosely as the movie gets stuck very early and the over use of flash backs causes it to drag on and on. Attempts to create emotional connection just leave you bored at best. They come far too late in the movie, you are saying OK already I got it 30 minutes ago, what happens next? The problem is nothing happens for a very long time. The positive reviewers of this movie are the ones who do not get it. The movie spells out the ending with blinding clarity but for some reason many people want to make it into more. The ending was never meant to be more than a culmination. There IS NO discovery, no revelation. No insight into the nature of mankind or deeper hidden meaning. The script was meant to be a journey not a destination. I cannot be more specific without giving away the movie, but suffice it to say that the director missed the point of the movie and irrevocably damaged it in the process. They thought they were being clever but instead it took the heart out of what could have been a very good movie.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe knock the couple comes up with is "Iron Man" by Black Sabbath.
- VerbindungenReferences Die Truman Show (1998)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 31 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
Oberste Lücke
By what name was Pandemikill - Sie holen dich (2014) officially released in Canada in English?
Antwort