IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,3/10
548
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Fast drei Jahrzehnte nach seiner Entführung durch den psychotischen Colonel Hogan muss sich der abgehärtete Vietnam-Veteran und Elitesoldat Mike Danton erneut dem Rachedurst seiner Erzfeinde... Alles lesenFast drei Jahrzehnte nach seiner Entführung durch den psychotischen Colonel Hogan muss sich der abgehärtete Vietnam-Veteran und Elitesoldat Mike Danton erneut dem Rachedurst seiner Erzfeinde stellen. Ist Danton immer noch der Beste?Fast drei Jahrzehnte nach seiner Entführung durch den psychotischen Colonel Hogan muss sich der abgehärtete Vietnam-Veteran und Elitesoldat Mike Danton erneut dem Rachedurst seiner Erzfeinde stellen. Ist Danton immer noch der Beste?
Michael Charles Prior
- Michael Danton Jr.
- (as Michael Prior)
Tara Kleinpeter
- Sophia
- (as Tara Sanford Kleinpeter)
Art. James
- Kaplan
- (as Art 'Sunshine' James)
Suki-Rose Simakis
- Candy
- (as Suki-Rose Etter)
A. Wade Miller
- Charlie
- (as Wade Miller)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Colonel Hogan(David Campbell)is back after 27 years of rotting in prison and he surely is very very angry.He gets released and immediately seeks out his revenge on Mike Danton(Ted Prior),extremely skilled soldier and total killing machine,the star of "Deadly Prey"(1987).But this time Hogan want to broadcast his revenge over the Internet.The cameras in the woods are filming every moment of carnage as Mike Danton kills dozens of armed soldiers via Rambo-like traps and his deadly weapons."Deadliest Prey" is very watchable and vastly entertaining action/survival flick with plenty of mindless violence.Prior still looks as menacing as ever and Campbell is delightfully over-the-top as the main villain.Three hackers are quite annoying,though.Overall,pretty cool homage to "Deadly Prey".8 severed arms out of 10.
I only saw the original Deadly Prey a few weeks ago and I enjoyed it so much I went out of my way to get this follow up. The original is really a great Gem of a cheapy, David Prior was well aware of the production limitations and just has an absolute Ball with the hokey material, in some ways it is even more funny than Rambo First Blood Part 2! The Deadliest Prey is more of a rehash than a true sequel, sort of like how Terminator 2 lifts many scenes from the original with slight context alterations, but TDP is a more extreme case. The new slant added to the story is the human hunting is caught on camera and broadcast over the net. Many of the original actors have come back to reprise their roles which bolsters the authenticity of the proceeding for fans, you will be surprised to hear their acting prowess hasn't changed one iota, and we wouldn't have it any other way! In all honesty, TDP isn't quite as entertaining as the original, but with that said there are still some great gags like when Danton is 'recruited' again, and if the Hackers don't at least make you smile, there is something seriously wrong. For all lovers of B films, Deadly Prey & The Deadliest Prey makes a great double- bill...True that!
It's quite impressive that a movie got a sequel with several of the original cast/director over quarter of a century later. But was it really needed?
Deadly Prey (1987) was a hyper cheesy Rambo ripoff that for some reason many consider to be a bit of a cult classic. I thought it was awful, but it had a certain 80's cheese factor charm at least.
26 years later and the story continues, well that's not entirely true. You see it does follow on from the events of the previous movie, with erm..........the same events of the previous movie. What I mean by that is this may be a sequel but it may as well be a remake as this is alarmingly similar, not only in regards to the plot but multiple scenes throughout.
I have no idea why they would do that, it's senseless. And here we're missing the 80's charm, it tries to replicate it with the same soundtrack and action style but it comes across forced and fails miserably.
I cringed throughout, I'd be surprised if even the most hardcore fan of the original appreciates this.
The Good:
Follows on from the previous movie
The Bad:
Some awful camerawork
"Action" is just awful
Some moments are so dumb it defies belief
Tacky soundtrack
More like a remixed version of the first movie
Deadly Prey (1987) was a hyper cheesy Rambo ripoff that for some reason many consider to be a bit of a cult classic. I thought it was awful, but it had a certain 80's cheese factor charm at least.
26 years later and the story continues, well that's not entirely true. You see it does follow on from the events of the previous movie, with erm..........the same events of the previous movie. What I mean by that is this may be a sequel but it may as well be a remake as this is alarmingly similar, not only in regards to the plot but multiple scenes throughout.
I have no idea why they would do that, it's senseless. And here we're missing the 80's charm, it tries to replicate it with the same soundtrack and action style but it comes across forced and fails miserably.
I cringed throughout, I'd be surprised if even the most hardcore fan of the original appreciates this.
The Good:
Follows on from the previous movie
The Bad:
Some awful camerawork
"Action" is just awful
Some moments are so dumb it defies belief
Tacky soundtrack
More like a remixed version of the first movie
It's all here. Wooden acting, terrible plot, cheesy special effects, lots of ridiculous and campy choreography.. And killing everyone. Just, killing everyone all over the dang place.
While I haven't watched the original yet (on my to-do list), the sequel is terrible. It's just hammy and hokey all throughout. I knew beforehand that I was about to watch a solid "B" class movie, but wow man. This one is just sub-par.
Mr. Prior (the writer) is apparently behind on the times, as his portrayals of nearly every facet of the world appear to be built entirely on clichés and stereotypes. The actions undertaken by the bad guys are far removed from typical military procedure. The evil villain was so cruel and vicious to his loyal soldiers that a few good facepalms were in order. Why would anyone sign up for that sort of abuse? Because they needed jobs? Ha ha! That's a good one.
The "hackers" seemed to have given Mr. Prior a particularly nasty writer's headache, as every bit of their dialogue was absolutely just hilariously bad and demonstrated a profound lack of technical computer skills. The audience members were also a great laugh, although I was a little confused about how they were watching a live internet feed on the TV at their favorite watering hole, and apparently doing so for nearly 12 hours.
The acting was either wooden and unbelievable or uproariously excessive. There was no middle ground.
There were some great moments though. As one reviewer mentioned, the villain at one point claims to have killed more people than cancer. Now THAT is a great line. I loved it.
Overall, the film was pretty boring. Even the action parts were handled slowly and cleanly to be point of being hard to watch.
I wanted to enjoy this, but there just really wasn't much to enjoy.
While I haven't watched the original yet (on my to-do list), the sequel is terrible. It's just hammy and hokey all throughout. I knew beforehand that I was about to watch a solid "B" class movie, but wow man. This one is just sub-par.
Mr. Prior (the writer) is apparently behind on the times, as his portrayals of nearly every facet of the world appear to be built entirely on clichés and stereotypes. The actions undertaken by the bad guys are far removed from typical military procedure. The evil villain was so cruel and vicious to his loyal soldiers that a few good facepalms were in order. Why would anyone sign up for that sort of abuse? Because they needed jobs? Ha ha! That's a good one.
The "hackers" seemed to have given Mr. Prior a particularly nasty writer's headache, as every bit of their dialogue was absolutely just hilariously bad and demonstrated a profound lack of technical computer skills. The audience members were also a great laugh, although I was a little confused about how they were watching a live internet feed on the TV at their favorite watering hole, and apparently doing so for nearly 12 hours.
The acting was either wooden and unbelievable or uproariously excessive. There was no middle ground.
There were some great moments though. As one reviewer mentioned, the villain at one point claims to have killed more people than cancer. Now THAT is a great line. I loved it.
Overall, the film was pretty boring. Even the action parts were handled slowly and cleanly to be point of being hard to watch.
I wanted to enjoy this, but there just really wasn't much to enjoy.
The original film was near perfection. Music, direction, script and casting. That brilliant star visited us all too briefly and many have tried to emulate it and while we were blessed with the Samurai Cops and Miami Connection's, we will never truly have another Deadly Prey.
The winner of multiple Dibrini awards and two coveted Danton crowns, the original was splendid and gaudy in its excellence. It had a genuine schlock which the industry of Nostalgia so desperately attempts to emulate. Duplication and imitation is a hard thing, outside of a specific era and place.
Deadliest Prey attempts to recapture past glories and like many sequels it seeks the safe path of rhyming, as the great Lucas would say. This it does well, covering the tried paths of the past while adding contemporary twists. No doubt a fun movie to have worked on, it still manages to entertain.
While it is nothing like the original, it never could be, it is also nothing like Fantastic Four (2015) or other big budget arrogantly made studio monsters. This is a humble production made for both fun and entertainment, what movies in past generations truly aspired for, especially during the straight to video days.
Enjoy it for what it is. Not because you compare it to better polished, though target missing super films.
63%
The winner of multiple Dibrini awards and two coveted Danton crowns, the original was splendid and gaudy in its excellence. It had a genuine schlock which the industry of Nostalgia so desperately attempts to emulate. Duplication and imitation is a hard thing, outside of a specific era and place.
Deadliest Prey attempts to recapture past glories and like many sequels it seeks the safe path of rhyming, as the great Lucas would say. This it does well, covering the tried paths of the past while adding contemporary twists. No doubt a fun movie to have worked on, it still manages to entertain.
While it is nothing like the original, it never could be, it is also nothing like Fantastic Four (2015) or other big budget arrogantly made studio monsters. This is a humble production made for both fun and entertainment, what movies in past generations truly aspired for, especially during the straight to video days.
Enjoy it for what it is. Not because you compare it to better polished, though target missing super films.
63%
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesFritz Matthews lost thirty-five pounds for his role as Thornton.
- PatzerMost of the time the pursuers run after Danton down the beaten path in single file like they already knew where he is going. Only towards the end of the movie they learn to correctly canvas the area in pairs.
- Crazy CreditsInstead of "The End", closing credits begin with "The Beginning".
- SoundtracksNever Say Die
Written by Tim James and Steve McClintock
Sung by Steve McClintock
Recorded by Steve Kempster
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Deadliest Prey?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Deadliest Prey
- Drehorte
- Mobile, Alabama, USA(main location)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 20 Min.(80 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.78 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen