Revenant

I feel bad, because i watched this movie and thought it was no good in any way, shape or form.

However... i cut the guys some slack. Because, i read they made it for $2,000. That's less than i've seen people ask for on crowd funding websites for a YouTube video.

Here's the thing though. The audience doesn't know the budget of a movie when they chose to watch it on Netflix. The thumbnail for the movie looks alright. How do you know it will be 1000x less impressive than something like "The Collection?" You don't. It's not the fault of these guys just trying to make a movie with some friends and a couple thousand dollars. I guess i'm more upset at Netflix recommending it right on my front page like i'll enjoy it because i watched "The Collection."

Just to cut to the chase, I liked this movie. I found it scary and that was the point so it worked for me. So why am I only giving this a 4 out of 10? Because while I kind of liked it, I have no interest in ever wanting to see it again (unless it is edited WAY down) and there were way too many parts of it that just weren't very good.

I understand this had a low budget and a small crew, and I think they did do a pretty good job with what they had to work with - but that doesn't make this movie "good." It's not a 1 star movie, but it's definitely not a 10 star movie either.

Not everyone who wants to be a film maker is good at it. There was definitely some talent here but it wasn't consistent throughout the film. I've seen people with better budgets make much worse movies than this, but there are too many places in this movie where the framing of the shot just wasn't right and the close ups were ridiculously close and the timing was off and the scene went on too long and give it a rest with the background music already... Things like that. They overdid it a little with some of the cheap scares in my opinion, too.

But then there were the beautifully framed shots and moments where the editing was perfect and on point and scares that I thought were awesome and well done. I thought the acting was passable (the kind of acting where you can tell they're acting but it isn't quite bad enough to take you out of the movie), the lighting was decent and perfectly set the spooky mood in most of the movie, and the effects were decently done. Unfortunately the effects are things we've seen before in other movies, but fortunately they're done pretty well - but then they go on way too long and it just gets cheesy.

I bet the filmmakers themselves know which parts of this movie work and which parts don't and which scenes could use some serious trimming. If this didn't have to be a 90 minute feature, I am sure they could edit it down into an absolutely brilliant 30 minute horror segment that would knock our socks off and get them all a lot more work.

I would love to see THAT version.

The segments with the landlord and the guy's pranky friend could be completely cut from this. That would be a start. They didn't do a bad job, they just aren't necessary to the story and don't really add anything to it. Honestly, I fast forwarded through way too much of this movie.

It's been difficult to find good haunted house or ghost story movies that are actually scary, and when I find one, I gotta say I like it. If you like that sort of thing and can get past it being drawn out longer than it should be, then I think this is probably worth a shot for you.

Calling this movie "good" is too much of a stretch. It's definitely good in parts, but in too many parts it's just not.

I rented this movie the other night. I hadn't heard of it so I had absolutely no expectations. From the opening credits it was obvious this was going to be a little low-budget indie flick. It turned out to be a very low key little ghost story with a really small storyline, tiny cast and no special effects.

A writer named Paul and his girlfriend Stella move into a house that is rumored to be haunted. Paul wants to use his experiences in the house as the basis for a book. Stella skips out at the first sign of ghosts, but Paul stays on, determined to finally finish something for once in his life. As the incidents escalate, Paul seeks out information from former tenants in order to validate what he is experiencing and finds only one who is willing to speak with him, a woman named Sue. It's obvious that Sue's been through hell, judging from the fact that she's a nervous, twitchy mess.

As small a movie as this one is, made on what must have been a shoestring budget, it still managed to deliver the scares. As for the use of the sheets, was it cheap and kind of dopey? Absolutely. But when you have no money in your budget for makeup, you do what you can. And it was still fairly effective nonetheless. And the right musical chord at just the right time goes a long way in delivering a good old fashioned jolt.

This was definitely a pleasant surprise after some of my latest endeavors into the horror/thriller genre, yes it is a fairly low budget movie and one writer of the story was the star and the other was the producer and his family played parts in the movie and also used his house as the setting but this put plenty of big budget attempts to shame. The story revolves around Paul who moves into an apparent haunted house for research for a book, yes nothing original there but it works. His girlfriend doesn't last long living there but she probably lasted longer than most of us would have, but Paul decides to stick it out in an attempt to make contact to get that winning edge for his book. After almost 3 months things certainly start to turn and despite my slight disappointment in the confrontation as I think it could have been done differently,credit has to go to the creators of this for a pretty good effort. There were those jumping moments and those moments where you are saying "don't be an idiot, just leave it alone" but to me, those are the things you want from these type of movies and I really liked the way they went about this one as sometimes less is more. I would recommend this to those who like me have been disappointed with a lot of these types of movies and those that enjoy these types of movies. 8/10

I've been reading some of these reviews and I'm wondering if they are about the same movie I've just seen On Demand. My review may not be as fancy as some of the one's I've just read but I'm someone who likes ghost stories and I really liked this movie.

I first saw the trailer for this movie on You Tube last year and it really peaked my interest. You can imagine my surprise when it popped up On Demand under a different name. I did a little research and found out this is a real little gem.

It's hard to believe they made this movie for the budget they said. Maybe it's some Hollywood thing to create a buzz about how little or how much you spend. I thought the acting was as good as any mainstream movie I've seen. There is one special effect I'm sure cost more than what their budget would allow, it was that good. Did it scare me? I can honestly say I had a pillow up to my face more than once, and a yell or two came out. Someone else reviewed Blair Witch was better. I couldn't watch Blair Witch because it made me nauseous from the hand held camera. I didn't have any problem with this film.

I'm going to be following these guys to see what other movies they come out with. I've already ordered my copy from Amazon for my collection. Should I have given them a 10? The reality of it is, only Stephen King gets a 10. (I wrote two reviews of this because the first disappeared on me. If they both show up, that's why.)