The Alto Knights

Based on a true story, we have two 1950's New York gangsters, Vito Genovese and Frank Costello, each played by Robert de Niro, who were childhood friends but are now vying for top dog status. The first scene is Frank being shot on the orders of Vito, which attempt on his life he survives. The rest of the film concerns the way(s) in which the various mob bosses try to deal with the fall-out. The climactic scene (which proves the old adage that truth is stranger than fiction, because fiction has to make sense) is farcical, and strangely out of keeping with the tone of what's gone before.

De Niro gives a great performance. Twice. But one's left with the question of why is he being asked to play dual roles? I can't see that anything is gained by this. In fact, I think the film would've been better if de Niro had played Frank and, say, Joe Pesci had played Vito.

And when de Niro is sitting opposite de Niro in the restaurant, I wanted one of them to ask "Are you looking at me?"

Overall, a well-done film from Barry Levinson with a fantastic performance from Debra Messing, who I feel should be considered for an Academy Award nomination. Debra was very convincing portraying Frank Costello's wife and the make-up used to age her identity was on point.

Moreover, I was first introduced about Frank Costello through cinema with the films, "Mobsters" , and "Bugsy." And, he was always came off as a background character or, a gangster with not much significant affiliation with the crime syndicates and Luciano crime family.

However, I am glad Costello's life during his later years was finally brought to the silver screen.

For being 82-years-old, I thought Bobby de Niro did one helluva job portraying both Costello and Vito Genovese.

The film does justice illustrating the historical events leading up to Frank's conflict with Vito Genovese, the background details of how Frank and Vito met in their younger ages and, Frank's eventual retirement from his life of crime.

The cast members each knew their assignment, respectively.

In particular, both Katherine Narducci and Michael Rispoli.

If the casting directors had hired other actors not too familiar with audiences, this film may have not been entertaining.

The film does move by a comfortable pace, yet with a running time of two hours, I left the theatre thinking that an extra 30 -45 minutes minutes would have created time to add more details about both Vito and Frank in their earlier days as young adults.

I really do not have any gripes or grudges about the film since I am enamored with crime dramas films involving gangsters from the Irish, Jewish, Italian, Black, English, Hispanic, heritages. To me, I find the history fascinating.

In my opinion, the film does give shades and similarities of The Irishman, Goodfellas, and also felt like Levinson's follow-up to "Bugsy." Lastly, I would say that this film is worth a viewing for all the fanatics of the crime-drama genre.

I saw the reviews of this and was surprised how negative they were.

I was always going to see it.

The critic in The Metro paper in the UK goes on about how old the film makers are,is this relevant?

I agree with her the film could be better but it is still a good watch.

I like this sort of film but am not an expert on the history of the story and viewers don't need to be.

Sending a reviewer who doesn't like gangster films to see a gangster film seems wrong.

I give no spoilers but the film reminded me of Once Upon A Time In America.

It is not as good as that film but this is still a quality production from a justly respected director.

The production design and costume design in this are excellent.

You believe you are in the 1950s.

I didn't notice any body using modern language either.

The soundtrack was great as well,I hope it is available on cd.

What about the script you ask? Well the script is fine,it tells a complicated story well.

The acting is great.

People playing older people look older.

I was not very familiar with all the cast but I was impressed with all the performances.

If anyone who likes this sort of film they should ignore the negative reviews and go and see it.

You believe.

This film was a bit like all of the other Robert De Niro Italian Mafia films, so you know what you're going to get. It's enjoyable, and by no means a bad film, but a tad formulaic.

I am unclear why De Niro played both main characters - at times it felt a little confused and, to be honest, my mind wandered to the prosthesis that went in to differentiating his looks. Was the fact he played both, a metaphor on the nature of the individuals (because this was based on real people), a commentary on the nature of the type of people involved, just a bit of fun for the actor, or an attempt to save money? Whichever, whilst it didn't have much of an impact on the film, it was odd.

As I say above, even though formulaic, an Nobel film, but with no surprises.

The Alto Knights... It takes all of the charm of GoodFellas (and is very clearly written by the same guy: Nicholas Pileggi), but it lacks the mastery that Scorsese brings, instead looking like a lazy knock-off. It has plenty of potential, but it chooses to take the easy way out and ends up feeling half-baked.

GoodFellas has one of the best narrations of all time by Henry Hill and his wife, Karen, and this movie attempts to do the same. However, it ultimately hurts more than it helps. Instead of adding on to the story, De Niro sits there and tells you the story for the first half hour. He tells you about himself and the other main characters and everyone's entire backstory, rather than letting you experience it for yourself. It starts off like nothing more than a bedtime story with some black and white stock footage of Hell's Kitchen in New York thrown on screen. Then it abandons the narration for a bit before picking it back up. It doesn't let you experience the characters and feel for them; it tells you exactly what it wants you to know, with no creativity, no room for interpretation, and no flair, all of which are things that a movie needs.

Apart from that, the writing is not particularly bad. It's nothing special, but it doesn't hurt the movie. De Niro does his best with what he's given, but the dual role ends up being too distracting. His dialogue scenes with himself feel clunky and out of place. All I could think about was how perfectly Joe Pesci would fit into that role as a short-tempered, stubborn mob boss (who lies to make himself taller).

This movie had so much potential, in both its story and its cast, but it was wasted, instead cutting corners. Yet, despite all of this, it was still a little bit of fun, and nice to see just a straightforward, traditional gangster movie. It's easy enough to look past all of its flaws and enjoy it (most of the time). There are some good moments of suspense, a few comedic lines, and even most of the side characters feel well-rounded enough to be believable. Unfortunately, this movie is only just good enough, nothing special, but it's for sure worth a watch if you get the chance.