The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring - Special Extended Edition Scenes

From a small child to a 27-year-old man this movie truly has held up through out the years. This movie is so good that it's a film I still revisit 23 years after its release. I highly recommend this movie to anyone that is interested in swords, magic, and a fantastic story. The movie starts out with a little bit of a backstory on what the entire world is built upon as this movie was made based off a series of books. The film then proceeds on a very compelling story getting you hooked on all of its characters and keeping you on the edge of your seat as the main threat in the movie feels present constantly whether it's the orcs, the things that creep in the dark, or even our own friends. The film also has several different main characters and as the story continues you get the perspective and point of view of each character and how their role in the story progresses the main story. It is truly a fantastic experience to watch this movie and I highly recommend for everyone to give it a look.

I estimated somewhere between 10 to 20 minutes of extra material. What was annoying is I found out is that there is about 30 minutes of extra credits at the end. Even though it is good to see an extended edition this was a big let down. This final cut is, in fact shorter then the third movie, (which had me confused); when you remove the needless extra 30 minutes of credits. Why the extra cuts? Was this done in order to have this extended version to make money with the 4 disc box set? The extra 30 minutes of credits could easily been added to one of the discs of the box sets. In the end these cut could have been in the original cinema release or extras as deleted scenes.

Twenty odd years after its original release I managed to get tickets to watch the Fellowship of the Rings extended Directors cut at my local cinema I already own this version on DVD and Blu-ray so I already knew how good letting Peter Jackson loose to edit his first LOTR's masterpiece is but getting to see it on a big screen was truly amazing 22 years after release and the special effects really stand up to modern standards plus as we all know the source material is a stone cold classic and letting Jackson show the extra material really makes this worth the nearly 4 hours (just make sure you have enough popcorn 🍿 to last! )

If you are a fan of the theatrical cut this version will float your boat.

I love rewatching this movie because it truly is a work of art. The sets in this film are so incredible. The story isn't all over the place, they keep the characters and the story easy to follow with not too much unnecessary parts added. I don't know off the top of my head what made this extended, but it all pieced together perfectly. It's lengthy, of course, but a beautiful movie. Incredibly ahead of its time being a 2001 film! Lord of the Rings is my favorite series of this genre. It never gets old to me.

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring (Extended Edition)

Fathom events put on a 3 day event over the weekend of June 8-10, 2024 to watch all 3 extended versions of the original trilogy in theaters. This review will have the slant of it being 23 years since the movie first hit theaters, and I've seen it dozens of times. I will say that I don't recall if I ever saw the extended editions in theaters; only on dvd, bluray or streaming.

First, I have to say that it was amazing to be in a full movie theater again. After nearly a year of seeing tons of movies, this is only the second time that's happened to me, and the other one was a nerdy movie too. Go nerds!

J R R Tolkien wrote the book throughout the 1940s, after the success of the Hobbit, calling on his own war time experiences during the Great War, and then WWII, which are noticed in the battle scenes, and the rise in nationalism.

The first movie concentrates on the set up and exposition explaining the conflict, the characters, and the ring itself. Then it moves on to the quest to destroy the object that is bringing the world to war. In order to separate good from evil, races are created that look like monsters, so as not to draw comparisons to our own earthly chaos.

One theme of the first film is that you can't use evil to defeat evil. It didn't work three thousand years ago, and it wasn't working in the present. The aforementioned fellowship falls apart because of this internal conflict. If a nuclear bomb is invented, but removed from the battlefield, don't run off with it to use it against your enemy, but destroy it. I definitely see pacifism in Tolkien's first book.

Another theme I encountered is conservationism. The strongest, most courageous hobbits live in harmony with the land. The dwarves kept digging for treasure until something was unleashed that killed them all. That's pretty spot on for a metaphor, I would think.

The world becomes so chaotic that even the "good and pure" elves are leaving. It's like they've given up. But having lived for thousands of years and seeing no improvements, I would probably leave too. They were given 3 rings of power that the 1 ring was supposed to subjugate, but they seem to have resisted that fate. Elves also live one with the land, but are still more of a warrior race, though reluctantly.

Finally, the theme of power corrupting ... everyone, is evidenced mostly in the human race. I already spoke about the end not justifying the means, but in the movie, heads of state, and heads of mysticism are suddenly on the bad guy's side because of corruption. They crave power, not just the means to end an evil.

Gandalf and the Balrog, sitting on the bridge. F L Y U F O O (LS). See you for The Two Towers.