Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.An online stalker torments a young woman.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Peter Michael Dillon
- Detective Bonham
- (as Peter Dillon)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This this movie uses way too much intense music to the buildup of absolutely nothing. Every few minutes that intense music comes on it's very annoying. So I'm going to have a hard time trying to get through this movie but I started it so I must finish unfortunately I'm about to lose 2 hours of my life for a movie I would not recommend. However I'm not a person that takes people's opinions and doesn't watch a movie because they say it sucks so have a looksee and see what you think. Can't believe that when the film was reviewed prior to being released somebody didn't say wait a minute you're using way too much music buildup for nothing.
This is a terrible movie. I watch a lot of movies and this one has no real life base.
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
It's one thing to try and scare people into being careful, but it's another to totally shield the audience from reality.
The cinematography is totally horrible. I am still not sure what Lifetime Channel had hoped to achieve form this movie.
Even the leading actress is working half way - - at no point do we see her authentic self.
Was it the company? The production? or the writers?
I have no clue. But I feel like I want my dollar back from red-box (it was that bad).
Literally the worst acting, and the fact it is so miscast made it even worse. Two stars instead of one since it was bad enough to made me right a review
...they telegraphed who the bad guy was. I mean, the instant the person appeared on screen, I knew it was the killer/stalker. That ruined any sense of suspense the movie could have had. So there was nothing else to keep my interest after that. It was especially bad since it happened relatively early in the film.
The technique of always hiding the bad guys' face throughout the movie just affirmed who it was. That was just very poor writing.
Another reviewer here said "The filmmakers kept the audience guessing about his identity". meaning the identity of the bad guy. Are you kidding me? Anyone who didn't know who the bad guy was as soon as they appeared should be ashamed of themselves. Judging by the number of high ratings in some of the reviews here, lots of people share that shame.
The technique of always hiding the bad guys' face throughout the movie just affirmed who it was. That was just very poor writing.
Another reviewer here said "The filmmakers kept the audience guessing about his identity". meaning the identity of the bad guy. Are you kidding me? Anyone who didn't know who the bad guy was as soon as they appeared should be ashamed of themselves. Judging by the number of high ratings in some of the reviews here, lots of people share that shame.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerWhen Dayton pulled up the files on his computer showing the personal information of both Paul Rogers and Detective John Bonham, the personal and business phone numbers in each file were exactly the same.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Cyberstalker?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 1.800.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 32 Min.(92 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen