IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,2/10
8575
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine übernatürliche, durch die Zeit reisende Musicaladaption von Charles Dickens' Kult-Weihnachtsgeschichte.Eine übernatürliche, durch die Zeit reisende Musicaladaption von Charles Dickens' Kult-Weihnachtsgeschichte.Eine übernatürliche, durch die Zeit reisende Musicaladaption von Charles Dickens' Kult-Weihnachtsgeschichte.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Luke Evans
- Scrooge
- (Synchronisation)
Olivia Colman
- Past
- (Synchronisation)
Jessie Buckley
- Isabel Fezziwig
- (Synchronisation)
Johnny Flynn
- Bob Cratchit
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Fra Fee
- Harry Huffman
- (Synchronisation)
Giles Terera
- Tom Jenkins
- (Synchronisation)
Trevor Dion Nicholas
- Present
- (Synchronisation)
James Cosmo
- Mr Fezziwig
- (Synchronisation)
Jonathan Pryce
- Jacob Marley
- (Synchronisation)
Oliver Jenkins
- Tiny Tim
- (Synchronisation)
Rupert Turnbull
- Tiny Tim
- (Synchronisation)
Devon Pomeroy
- Kathy Cratchit
- (Synchronisation)
Zaris-Angel Hator
- Beryl
- (Synchronisation)
Jemima Newman
- Jen Scrooge
- (Synchronisation)
- (as Jemima Lucy Newman)
Jeremiah Daley
- Young Ebenezer
- (Synchronisation)
Rebecca Gethings
- Ethel Cratchit
- (Synchronisation)
- …
Sheena Bhattessa
- Hela Huffam
- (Synchronisation)
Homer Todiwala
- Tamal
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
There have been over 100 versions of this story on film and TV in the last 100 years or so.
This one, while competently made, adds nothing to the canon.
It is technically well enough done and has some fine glitz and glitter, but the plot is truncated to the point of abandonment; the character development isn't; the songs, with some exceptions are lifeless and listless.
How can I say this: even Tiny Tim comes off as a two-minute afterthought.
It's not that the story can't abide restaging. The best may still be the 1951 Alistair Sim, but the 1992 Muppet version was fresh and winning, and eve last month's Spirited gave us some pizzaz and some energy.
Scrooge: A Christmas Carol 2022, while not bad, per se, was as unnecessary a project as I can remember.
This one, while competently made, adds nothing to the canon.
It is technically well enough done and has some fine glitz and glitter, but the plot is truncated to the point of abandonment; the character development isn't; the songs, with some exceptions are lifeless and listless.
How can I say this: even Tiny Tim comes off as a two-minute afterthought.
It's not that the story can't abide restaging. The best may still be the 1951 Alistair Sim, but the 1992 Muppet version was fresh and winning, and eve last month's Spirited gave us some pizzaz and some energy.
Scrooge: A Christmas Carol 2022, while not bad, per se, was as unnecessary a project as I can remember.
I'm a bit of a Scrooge-a-holic, always looking for new versions of the classic tale. While the animation here was quite striking, what they did with it added little to the story. A Christmas Carol is a story of redemption. This Scrooge is terrorized by the characters he encounters. After seeing his headstone, he falls into a kind of hell, ending up in his bedroom. Was this a story of redemption or an ugly assault on the senses. Because all the children looked bright eyed and healthy, even Tiny Tim, I couldn't buy into the pathos. Dickens meant the world to be a dark one because it reflected what many in Victorian England faced every day: poverty, hopelessness, and fear. Scrooge, in the original, propagated that through indifference and inaction. By the way, I found the nephew absolutely insufferable and Cratchit way too insignificant. We get little character development and some of the best parts of the story are glossed over or treated without foundation. I also found the dog silly and unnecessary.
Homage to Roald Neame version of Scrooge, it is , for CGI more, a seductive animation inspired by the classic novel. And, sure imaginative at whole, reminding the good tastes of the fascinations specific to childhood.
I like Prudence , against the strange idea about a Scrooge as owner of a pet, I admire the scene about connection , in past, between Robert Cratchit and Ebenezer, like the inspired option for Jonathan Pryce for ghost of Jacob Marley, remembering the old beautiful work of Alec Guinness in the original version.
It is unfair to critic it . First, because it is a new demonstration of hard work with a not significant budget and about large possibilities offered by technology today. Second, because i am too old for critics. My favorit options are in the past . And this correct , imaginative, seductive Scrooge, like a noble hommage to work for 1970 Scrooge, has the beautiful virtue to remind, in fair manner,the splendid art of leslie bricusse.
I like Prudence , against the strange idea about a Scrooge as owner of a pet, I admire the scene about connection , in past, between Robert Cratchit and Ebenezer, like the inspired option for Jonathan Pryce for ghost of Jacob Marley, remembering the old beautiful work of Alec Guinness in the original version.
It is unfair to critic it . First, because it is a new demonstration of hard work with a not significant budget and about large possibilities offered by technology today. Second, because i am too old for critics. My favorit options are in the past . And this correct , imaginative, seductive Scrooge, like a noble hommage to work for 1970 Scrooge, has the beautiful virtue to remind, in fair manner,the splendid art of leslie bricusse.
Yet another film transposition of one of the most beautiful and iconic Christmas stories of all time and I can say by heart that this is the ugliest and least faithful of all, even if the film itself is not bad but when compared to all the others done so far this is the worst done. The main problems of the film are two, one is the dog that has absolutely nothing to do with it and is just annoying for most of the film and the other is the fact that the film is too childish, denaturing the more adult part of the original work in favor of an audience of small children, thus taking away a lot from the original teaching of history to make it more likeable.
I am one of those people that can love movies solely on the artwork and music. This movie served several, strong music "reveal" moments. I would compare it to how you felt the first time you watched "Show Yourself" and/or "Rewrite the Stars." So many of those moments. Also, I found it to be hilarious. If you're big on the traditional Dickens style, this may not be the movie for you. Because it's loosely comparable. CAN BE SCARY FOR SOME KIDDOS. The ending is a little darker than maybe some of the other adaptations. I would say it's similar to the Moana ending. All in all, I wept through the whole thing, lol. My Spotify playlist gained nearly the whole soundtrack!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThis is an animated version of Scrooge (1970) released in 1970 with Albert Finney as Scrooge. Six songs from the original version were redone and used in the animated version, as well, "Christmas Children", "I Like Life", "Happiness", "The Beautiful Day", "Thank You Very Much", and "I'll Begin Again". However, "Christmas Children", which usually plays at the start of the story, is only heard during the end credits. The soundtrack release places the songs in the correct order.
- VerbindungenFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Remembering the True Batman (2022)
- SoundtracksI Love Christmas
Performed by Fra Fee
Music & lyrics by Leslie Bricusse
Published by Stage & Screen LTD, 2021
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Scrooge: A Christmas Carol?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Scrooge: Cuento de Navidad
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 36 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen