Sexuele voorlichting

movie Seksuele Voorlichting

The Belgian 1991 video Seksuele Voorlichting is a pretty good production for an amateur crew and an all-amateur cast. The setting is a "normal" family. The minors show what needs to be shown, and do not engage in sexual intercourse of any kind. Another reviewer blames the makers of this film for not presenting the children as immaculate lilies, a silly rebuke since children are sexual beings from the very start, masturbating in the womb before they are born. The topics are presented one after the other: anatomy, function, wet dream, masturbation, menstruation, hygiene, playing doctor, falling in love, kissing. The demonstration of reproductive sex with full penetration is done by an adult couple, with no minors present. There is no plot, so this review cannot have any spoilers. There is hardly any acting. The video is a simple straightforward documentary. The music I find dull. There is no brilliant camera work. There are no special effects. These elements are not lacking; they are not needed. Any filmish showing off would just distract. There is no hip hyperactive presenter who says and does crazy things. I find the video fully OK in its genre, and give it eight stars out of ten: one off for imperfect editing here and there, and one off for the choice of music. I close with a warning: when the grownup daughter who has left the house comes in with her partner announcing they are going to have a baby, the happy news is celebrated with alcoholic drinks of which the pregnant daughter has one. This is a no-no! Pregnant women should not take any alcohol: it's bad for the unborn child. That should be part of the sexual education of the teenage audience that the film aims at. It's the only thing I find seriously wrong with the video.

It purports to be a sex education film and to a certain extent, it is so.But the nudity and sex shown in the film is somewhat bizarre and not at all appealing what it is trying to claim.It subtly exploits under age nudity and sex to earn the lot. Perhaps to a connoisseur of existential realism, the film may be depicting what might have been going through the rungs of infancy to puberty of boys and girls.But in my opinion, one should not invest on such taboos to woo finance, but okay if the real intention is pedagogy.It seems the under age actors donned for the film are of the actual age as portrayed in the documentary. Behold it at your leisure , invest your wisdom on it, and infer whether it is a documentary or an under age sex farce. Being the paternal parent to my two daughters, I could not digest this on screen element. Whatever be the freedom extended to art forms, child nudity and child sex should not be allowed as a lucrative art.Let the children be children as immaculate lily. I have a strong apprehension that the under age actors in the documentary (?) are victims of art or run into it upon penury. May not it be so.