IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,9/10
12.528
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Die Reise eines Mannes in die Zukunft, um eine sterbende Welt zu retten.Die Reise eines Mannes in die Zukunft, um eine sterbende Welt zu retten.Die Reise eines Mannes in die Zukunft, um eine sterbende Welt zu retten.
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Nominierungen insgesamt
Meme Thorne
- Newsreader
- (as Mémé Thorne)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I found this a very interesting concept and story, ruined by some terrible acting (apart from Ryan Kwanten) and the lead character spending most of the movie blubbering and crying (even more than Burnham on ST: Discovery!!!). Also, the music score is absolutely woeful. So many bad choices for the scenes they were meant to enhance.
Bigger budget and a better cast may have helped.
There was so much potential that was lost in ridiculous science and poor directing of actors.
Good Concept; Earth devastated by climate change and an nuclear war. The O2 level on earth is running out because of these events. One City has been able to hold out thanks to synthetic oxygen but the oxygen also causes The Sickness.
Below Average Plot; Boring slow middle part Bad Acting; Main are OK Bad Dialogue; Below Average Fun;
Good Decor/aesthetics; Futuristic Neon City, Cyberpunky apartments with visible decay, The opening scene with Bladerunner/Cyberpunky city streets & the transparant television screens is great. There is a great shot in the office of Regina the acting and dialogue in this scene is average at best but the decor is really good imo. There are a few cool shots like of the city skyline around 23min or the shot at 1:02 with the decayed/overgrown city looks like Kingdom of the planet of the Apes.
I rate this film a 5/10. I like the aesthetics but its barely an Average Film.
Below Average Plot; Boring slow middle part Bad Acting; Main are OK Bad Dialogue; Below Average Fun;
Good Decor/aesthetics; Futuristic Neon City, Cyberpunky apartments with visible decay, The opening scene with Bladerunner/Cyberpunky city streets & the transparant television screens is great. There is a great shot in the office of Regina the acting and dialogue in this scene is average at best but the decor is really good imo. There are a few cool shots like of the city skyline around 23min or the shot at 1:02 with the decayed/overgrown city looks like Kingdom of the planet of the Apes.
I rate this film a 5/10. I like the aesthetics but its barely an Average Film.
For those complaining about all the "emotions"... I'm quite positive that faced with the prospect of being catapulted some 400 years into an uncertain future world, via a big sizzling Dyson vacuum cleaner controlled by a super computer that still uses a blinking cursor and a keyboard, leaving behind your dying significant other, with no return ticket and the fate of all humanity resting on your very narrow shoulders... one would shed significantly more bodily fluids than a few blubbering tears.
I mean honestly people... 2067 is currently rated somewhere between Super Mario Brothers and Tank Girl... Obviously "fair" is not a grown-up word.
So here is an honest review... I watched this movie with very low expectations having seen its score and read a few reviews. I was pleasantly surprised that it held my attention to the very end. I was impressed with the visuals and special effects. The "science" and storyline do require a modicum of suspension of disbelief, but remember why most of us watch movies... To escape from our miserable realities for a couple hours... So we can forgive ourselves for putting our Underoos on and just enjoying a movie every once-in-a-while without screaming for a full refund on the last 2 hours of our banal lives. As relatively unknowns, I feel the cast earned their paychecks, as I'm certain none of them raked it in, and I found myself actually caring about these characters whom I'd only met mere minutes earlier. Lastly I was happy I was eventually able to wrap my head around the plot without suffering an Inception-like brain freeze.
Have faith peeps, you can make it through this movie... And if you're not too careful... You just might enjoy it.
So here is an honest review... I watched this movie with very low expectations having seen its score and read a few reviews. I was pleasantly surprised that it held my attention to the very end. I was impressed with the visuals and special effects. The "science" and storyline do require a modicum of suspension of disbelief, but remember why most of us watch movies... To escape from our miserable realities for a couple hours... So we can forgive ourselves for putting our Underoos on and just enjoying a movie every once-in-a-while without screaming for a full refund on the last 2 hours of our banal lives. As relatively unknowns, I feel the cast earned their paychecks, as I'm certain none of them raked it in, and I found myself actually caring about these characters whom I'd only met mere minutes earlier. Lastly I was happy I was eventually able to wrap my head around the plot without suffering an Inception-like brain freeze.
Have faith peeps, you can make it through this movie... And if you're not too careful... You just might enjoy it.
Don't really want to slate this as it tries really hard.
Kept me up til 1am and I still rated it a 6.
Low budget (tried a bit hard to be higher budget) sci-fi with just enough to make you want to see it through.
Music was a bit over the top in places, the actor that played the little kid (although small part) is going places, watch this space.
Trailer made it look much better than it was unfortunately. 6/10 seems fair.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAlthough the movie takes place in Australia and everyone speaks with an Australian accent, Jude, played by Australian actor Ryan Kwanten, is the only character in the film that inexplicably speaks with an American accent.
- PatzerThey are sending someone 400 years forward in time. With no clue or anything in what kind of (unfriendly?) environment he will arrive. And they don't give him any food or drink for the first days in the future? So he has to eat some berries which are unknown and turned out to be very poisonous.
- Crazy CreditsNo butterflies were harmed during the making of this film.
- VerbindungenReferences The Time Machine (2002)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is 2067?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 54 Min.(114 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen