Reveille

Not really as good as some day. Acting is wooden. Characters are not great. Maybe we've been spoiled by such high quality big budget productions, but it's not really got any redeeming features as such. I'd not recommend. It's nice the Germans speak German, this is my preferred type of portrayal, but this doesn't event save it for me.

There are few good bits, but they don't pull it out of a low rating. It's very home made feeling, I don't know why this is. Maybe the camera angles, or the framing. Overall I agree with the lower scoring reviews here. Having watched many war films from 1943 through till modern day, I feel you will be watching a lot to score many below this one.

Great movie about war and suffering - interesting angles, draing in the viewer by protraying the two contrasting sides in war, all appearing as humans in their own communities, but savage enemies as seen from the other side - absolutely brilliant concept and execution.

Nice touches all along the movie, one feels as if they're right there beside the actors.

Dialogues are natural, no forced feeling at all - absolutely brilliant!

Not your typical bang-bang-boom-boom war movie so if you're into call of duty type stuff, better find something else to watch - oh and please don't come here complaining that the setting doesn't look anything like Germany :D:D and similar sillyness :D - it is stated that the story takes place in Italy :D:D.

I have no idea what these people are talking about, saying this movie is good. The acting is poor, I have seen high school plays with better acting. The movie was shot in MO which has no similarities to Germany. Lastly, the pace of the movie is so slow and not entertaining at all.

There is a part where a soldier stands there for 5 minutes or so scratching his junk because he got crabs from an Italian girl. The movie may be based on true events, but whoever decided to make this movie should reconsider changing careers. It has to be one of the worst, if not the worst, WWII movie ever made!!!!!!!!

Background: The story of this film is inspired by chapter 4 of Audie Murphy's book "To Hell and Back". One could argue that it is a mostly accurate portrayal of events. Some of the characters are fictionalized for the sake of the story but it's quite clear that Jared Becker's "Sarge" is intended to portray Audie himself in this situation.

Audio and Cinematography: For a low budget film, Mike has done quite a good job. There are some issues one could argue is linked to budget and while it does detract at times, it's not a deal breaker by any means. For example there are some fairly overexposed shots here and there and there are some jarring moments of audio where editing could have been a tad better but, like I said, this is more of a budget issue and not something I'd hold against the film as a whole. Overall while some of the audio is where the film is weakest, it is audio that also makes the film strong during its strongest moments. The cracking of incoming gunfire is absolute spectacularly well done. While the moments of combat are brief, they are more than memorable in both their sound design and staging. All scenes in the cave, however, suffered very few issues with audio and visuals and honestly most everything sounded well and the cinematography and lighting was quite well done. I do want to rewatch this in my theater room from a bluray or raw media instead of Amazon as I'm sure some of the issues I encountered was due to the streaming platform.

Technical Accuracy: Akkerman was really striving for historical accuracy here and I think he did a very commendable job. Any issues were, at worst, incredibly minor and pedantic. I could go into what I noticed if someone wants but it really comes down to severe rivet counting if I'm being honest. It's significantly better than 99.9% of productions to include nearly every big budget film released in the last 20 years. The attention to detail is very good overall. Everything to very specific personal items, the way gear is being worn, the way its used, and the proper use of insignia given the period. Additionally, the feature of Afrika Korps uniforms on the NCOs as a carryover from their previous campaign is a nice touch.

Writing and Acting: The writing and performances themselves has a lot to commend. The portrayal of panic was mostly done well but honestly the portrayal of wounds (MAJOR kudos to the makeup department of this one) and wounded soldiers in the way they act is almost scary how well done it is. Typically low budget and indie productions have terrible dialog but this isn't an example of that. While there were moments of unnecessary exposition and some minor cliches, the dialog was excellent overall and felt very throughout the film. This dialog was further enhanced by some rather stellar performances. Four in particular stand out in my mind (in no particular order): Joe Bongiovanni's Leo, Jake Powers' Rowe, Kevin Sinic's Artur, and Bernd Wittneben's Brander.

Final thoughts: Overall Akkerman has created a beautiful film. It really hits some emotions that don't often arise in war films and we see the characters transform for better or for worse. The acting is quite believable and the writing quite organic. As a final rating I'd give it a 7/10. If it wasn't for some of the audio issues, it'd be a firm 8/10 in my book. It's not a bad film by any means, that was just something that broke my immersion a couple times. Additionally, it was slightly too long I'd argue. At 1 hour and 45 minutes, it told its story well but I feel like at 1 hour and 30 minutes, it could have achieved perfect flow. A minor complaint given the fact that this really is a fantastic film and one I would purchase on bluray without question and watch yearly.

Brilliant depiction of a soldier's experiences, one civilians can only imagine. Reveille is a throwback to the days when acting was subtle and provocative, when a mere gesture said it all, when understatement mattered. Ackerman takes us to the heart of the battlefield, to humanity in raw form in this artfully done, atmospheric depiction of war. Unconventionally, for a war flick, it slows down, pauses in all the right places underscoring the conflict of conscious, the self-preserving mechanism of laughter, the sanctity of loyalty and sacrifice, all present minus the distraction of frenetic energy and quick moving scenes. Instead, from the beginning, we agree to patience, to listen, reflect, ponder expressions, words, gestures, and all the while we're tricked by the dark humor and bonding of the Americans, but then jarred back to reality with a frequent panning of the camera to the Germans and their suffering, and so it goes back and forth, juxtaposing the two, laughter and pain, until the two are indistinguishable; and, hence, the psychological aspect, which makes it engrossing, disturbingly real, to the point where it's no longer about the enemy, or one side or the other, and war is deflated in a sense, absurdly irrelevant when weighed against a moral conscience. Masterpiece. Thank you for it!