Nachdem er nach jahrzehntelanger Gefangenschaft durch einen sterblichen Zauberer entkommen war, macht sich Dream, die Personifizierung des Traums, daran, seine verlorene Ausrüstung zurückzuh... Alles lesenNachdem er nach jahrzehntelanger Gefangenschaft durch einen sterblichen Zauberer entkommen war, macht sich Dream, die Personifizierung des Traums, daran, seine verlorene Ausrüstung zurückzuholen.Nachdem er nach jahrzehntelanger Gefangenschaft durch einen sterblichen Zauberer entkommen war, macht sich Dream, die Personifizierung des Traums, daran, seine verlorene Ausrüstung zurückzuholen.
- Nominiert für 1 BAFTA Award
- 10 Nominierungen insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Zusammenfassung
Reviewers say 'The Sandman' series is lauded for its captivating narrative, stunning visuals, and faithful adaptation of Neil Gaiman's comic series. The show explores dark fantasy, psychological drama, and the human condition, with standout performances, especially Tom Sturridge as Dream. However, it faces criticism for uneven pacing, inconsistent writing, and deviations from the source material. Some express dissatisfaction with character portrayals and diversity representation. Despite these issues, many find the series engaging and eagerly anticipate future seasons.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
This show was so exciting. I've never fallen asleep during a show before. This one?? I watched it, passed out. Rewound it, passed out again. I think it's cursed-or it's a secret sleep aid and I think the plot is just a lullaby.
Great visuals, epic concept.......and the perfect cure for insomnia. :)
Great visuals, epic concept.......and the perfect cure for insomnia. :)
I have to say I enjoyed The Sandman more than I thought I would. I have to admit I knew nothing of the comic or even heard of it so I had no expectations at all. It is definitely something different and unlike any show I've seen. The closest thing is American Gods but I stoped watching that in Season 2 as the quality of that show fell off after the first season. It has a solid 7.7 so it looks like most people seem to like it. I thought Tom Sturridge did an excellent job as the lead and Boyd Holbrook was just as good as one of the villains the of the story. The creator of the comic book (Neil Gaiman) was an executive producer so he had a big say as to where the story went and for it to stay true to the comic. I'm glad they didn't end the show on a cliffhanger and were able to give it a good solid ending.
When "The Sandman" first came out on Netflix, I fell instantly and absolutely in love with everything in the series... the plot was good and strong (even innovative!), the characters were well constructed and the world was built with substance, with a lot of layers. It was indeed a breath of fresh air when it comes to fantasy series or movies that have been coming out this past few years.
The script itself, having a lot of philosophy in it, was also something that attracted me because you could tell the lines were not forced at all. Overall, the series were a 10 out of 10.
But then, season 2 came out this year.
I was excited to see again another story happen in this fantastic world that was built but then... it was just a big, huge, disappointement. The plot is going side ways with no plausible justification on why "x" thing happens in the context of the story and the characters are full with lines that dont add anything relevant and seem unnatural for a certain character to say or act that way.
To make matters worse, how does it make sense to start throwing new characters every episode just to fill holes, when they add almost nothing to the general narrative?
The ending of season 2, was the cherry on top of a badly baked cake. I mean, it just splashes on our faces that they wanted to end the series as soon as possible but didnt even bother to build something that had quality and felt like it was thought over like the first season. It really made me angry to see such good characters (and amazing actors!!!), plot and story just thrown away to the trash literally to end something fast.
It's very sad because then people wonder why we dont have any good series or films with a fresh point of view being made and coming out like we had in the 90s/2000s, for example. Write better and dont waste great potential like in "The Sandman" season 2.
The script itself, having a lot of philosophy in it, was also something that attracted me because you could tell the lines were not forced at all. Overall, the series were a 10 out of 10.
But then, season 2 came out this year.
I was excited to see again another story happen in this fantastic world that was built but then... it was just a big, huge, disappointement. The plot is going side ways with no plausible justification on why "x" thing happens in the context of the story and the characters are full with lines that dont add anything relevant and seem unnatural for a certain character to say or act that way.
To make matters worse, how does it make sense to start throwing new characters every episode just to fill holes, when they add almost nothing to the general narrative?
The ending of season 2, was the cherry on top of a badly baked cake. I mean, it just splashes on our faces that they wanted to end the series as soon as possible but didnt even bother to build something that had quality and felt like it was thought over like the first season. It really made me angry to see such good characters (and amazing actors!!!), plot and story just thrown away to the trash literally to end something fast.
It's very sad because then people wonder why we dont have any good series or films with a fresh point of view being made and coming out like we had in the 90s/2000s, for example. Write better and dont waste great potential like in "The Sandman" season 2.
First of all, series II is better than series I, and that doesn't always happen.
Series II is more mature. The main character definitely evolves more and analyzes his behavior. He even apologizes (though the first time it's a non-apology, just like with politicians).
The series is dark, baroque, stylized, and features some excellent reflections, such as: "The greatest curse of getting what you want is getting what you wanted." The series also requires a certain erudition, as the characters can reference a literary work, revealing only a fragment of the plot or the character's name but not the title. Or they encounter a whole galaxy of long-forgotten gods, from Odin (the perhaps more well-known one) to Ishtar (the perhaps lesser-known one).
The series features excellent humanist themes about the tragedies of ordinary people. There's a great character of a trans woman whose family behaved very badly at a funeral, and a young woman with gloves with a troubled past. These are truly excellent storylines.
Among the show's flaws is the seamless transition from one completed case to another, and then a third. Perhaps it would have been more sensible to make several, but shorter, seasons. Especially since some storylines feel a bit drawn out.
However, despite minor flaws, I think the show deserves 8 stars after the second season.
Series II is more mature. The main character definitely evolves more and analyzes his behavior. He even apologizes (though the first time it's a non-apology, just like with politicians).
The series is dark, baroque, stylized, and features some excellent reflections, such as: "The greatest curse of getting what you want is getting what you wanted." The series also requires a certain erudition, as the characters can reference a literary work, revealing only a fragment of the plot or the character's name but not the title. Or they encounter a whole galaxy of long-forgotten gods, from Odin (the perhaps more well-known one) to Ishtar (the perhaps lesser-known one).
The series features excellent humanist themes about the tragedies of ordinary people. There's a great character of a trans woman whose family behaved very badly at a funeral, and a young woman with gloves with a troubled past. These are truly excellent storylines.
Among the show's flaws is the seamless transition from one completed case to another, and then a third. Perhaps it would have been more sensible to make several, but shorter, seasons. Especially since some storylines feel a bit drawn out.
However, despite minor flaws, I think the show deserves 8 stars after the second season.
I thought the show was really great the first episodes, dark setting and interesting characters. Somewhere along the way I grew bored by the show however. I will probably watch the second season if it ever comes out since I am a fan of the novels. This was entertaining but the stark difference to how it started and how it ended made it less interesting for me. I hope the next season will focus on what made the first episodes so good. I think maybe sandmand will have a hard time to compete with all the upcoming franchises coming out this fall, I hope I am wrong though!
On another note, 600 characters requirement for a short user review is too damn long!
On another note, 600 characters requirement for a short user review is too damn long!
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDave McKean, who created the covers for the comic series, came out of "Sandman retirement" to design the credits sequences for this series.
- Crazy CreditsThe Warner Bros and DC Comics logos are formed from shifting sands.
- VerbindungenFeatured in AniMat's Crazy Cartoon Cast: Geeked Week for Freaks (2021)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- The Sandman
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 45 Min.
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 16:9 HD
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen