Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuThe venerated filmmaker Eisenstein is comparable in talent, insight and wisdom, with the likes of Shakespeare or Beethoven; there are few - if any - directors who can be elevated to such hei... Alles lesenThe venerated filmmaker Eisenstein is comparable in talent, insight and wisdom, with the likes of Shakespeare or Beethoven; there are few - if any - directors who can be elevated to such heights. On the back of his revolutionary film Battleship Potemkin, he was celebrated around ... Alles lesenThe venerated filmmaker Eisenstein is comparable in talent, insight and wisdom, with the likes of Shakespeare or Beethoven; there are few - if any - directors who can be elevated to such heights. On the back of his revolutionary film Battleship Potemkin, he was celebrated around the world, and invited to the US. Ultimately rejected by Hollywood and maliciously maligne... Alles lesen
- Auszeichnungen
- 2 Gewinne & 10 Nominierungen insgesamt
- Alba
- (as Alenka Rios Hart)
- Bodyguard 2
- (as Paris Santibáñez)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Now as for as Eisenstein , Greenaway has finally resolved to exert some self discipline and to remind us that he is a director to be reckoned with. Eisenstein is an extremely profound emotional journey. At one level , it directly transplants you into the main character: it makes you see through the eyes of an innocent , abroad in a completely foreign, exotic land, i e. Through the eyes of Eisenstein. There are Day of the Dead parades, sun drenched , hugely coloufrul landscapes and , constantly hovering on the horizon , a vaguely ( and sometimes not so vaguely ) threatening atmosphere. Long story short, this is a historical/ psychoanalytical story that, despite all the odds, Peter Greenaway somehow turns into a riveting and entertaining picture.
Clearly here he had enough money to put his talents for framing, colour and composition to great effect. Also, I thought that the two main characters were very well-cast and imbued the story with real depth; as did many of the supporting actors, such as Palomino's wife, and the bell-ringer (the only jarring note for me being the guy playing "Hunter" - who mostly seemed to be standing stiffly waiting for his next line...).
As others have noted, this is not the film you need if you want lots of "Eisenstein on set, directing" footage, but for me there was plenty of implied and explicit context regarding his standing in Russia, support in the USA and the point in his life he'd got to at the time. Well worth a viewing.
No one would expect Peter Greenaway's treatment to be strictly reverent, although now in his seventies, Greenaway has no hesitation of venturing into the prurient facet of Eisenstein's idiosyncrasy and abandon, preponderantly, the film is a two-hander between Sergei (Bäck) and his Mexican guide Palomino Cañedo (Alberti), to whom Sergei claims to lose his virginity. Sergei's homosexual initiation is explicitly explored in the palatial hotel room he stays, on that vast bed, the sex temple he shares with Palomino, and coins the first ten days in Guanajuato as "Ten Days that shook Eisenstein", a wordplay to his revolutionary pièce-de-résistence OCTOBER: TEN DAYS THAT SHOOK THE WORLD (1928).
Greenaway delights in magnifying Eisenstein's blunt self-reflection and directorial frustration (although it is mostly an interior piece that largely overlooks the filmmaker's onerous field work, excluding a visit to the Mummies of Guanajuato and the institution of the Day of the Dead celebration) through his larger-than-life approach which constitutes operatic ways of utterance, info-dumping sleight-of-hand where real-life footage is rapidly juxtaposed to counterpoint the references in a triptych split-screen, and majestic, but noticeably digitally airbrushed and light-inflected scenography, being put into great use in the flourishes of 360 degree twirling shots and seamlessly edited faux-long shots, etc., all is impressive on a grandiose scale, but also appreciably betrays an overreaching effort to reassure us that he is still at the top of his game.
Under the spotlight is Finnish actor Elmer Bäck's madcap impersonation of a ludic, unprepossessing Eisenstein, sporting a fuzzy, bouffant hairdo à la Einstein, and gives his all to Greenaway's undue caprices, which on the whole leaves the impression that Eisenstein is more hysterical than sympathetic, a clownish figure whose brilliance is very much elusive to moderately stunned audience, a typical case of miscast should be noted. Luis Alberti, by comparison, comes off less scathed owing to his more natural and unaffected "stud" role in the play.
By and large, Greenaway's self-reflexive, symphonically flamboyant opus can be construed as a nonconformist filmmaker's knowing salute to a free-spirited genius who constantly clashes with his times and whose legacy should be incessantly exhumed to meet new light and fresh air, and knock dead any number of spectators.
The love story in this is really touching , seeing someone discover there own body and accept it in such a way was beautiful.
Feels like a companion pieces do 8 & 1/2 somehow.
A bold film that takes composition to new levels with passionate experimental shots and beautifully blocked and lit frames.
Greenaway has a way of saying so much in his films that make me ask myself so many questions or feel so many feelings.
If you enjoy art and being provoked in an artful way then this film is for you. Underrated and under appreciated in my humble opinion.
What I loved about this movie: The editing is fantastic. It plays around with the format, having real life photos of the characters and the locations next to characters as they are mentioned, playing with angles and positions of the characters, experimenting with colors, and obviously, using montages in a great way. I hope this is all based on Eisenstein's actual writings about the subject, as it is clear that he has thoughts about what movies can do with these tools.
That's the one positive thing I have to say about this movie. The characters are stylized into cartoon characters, and the dialog is boring and unengaging. The actual storyline is very forgettable. Greenaway chose to have the movie focus on Eisenstein's experiences in Mexico, but did not include any of the actual movie-making Eisenstein did there. To me, that would have been a more interesting movie - but I can understand that Greenaway had a different vision for this story.
The sexual scenes were graphical, but not grotesque or provoking (unless you are provoked by homosexuality).
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThe starring actor Elmer Bäck is Finnish, his mother tongue is Swedish, his character is Russian and the film is set in a Spanish-speaking country - but the only language he speaks in the film is English.
- PatzerEisenstein says Chaplin, Pickford, and Fairbanks were at Universal. They were at United Artists.
- Zitate
Sergei Eisenstein: My prick is a stowaway, and even sadder clown than me. He wears a sad clown's helmet.
- Crazy CreditsThe end credits sequence is from the POV of a car driving through contemporary (2015) streets, as seen by present-day signage and cars it passes. It's the only part of the film not set in 1931.
- VerbindungenFeatured in The Greenaway Alphabet (2017)
- SoundtracksRomeo and Juliet Op. 64 Act 1 No. 13 Dance of the Knights
Composed by Sergei Prokofiev
Performed by Orquesta Sinfónica de la Universidad de Guanajuato
Conducted by Juan Trigos
Published by Le Chant du Monde
Top-Auswahl
- How long is Eisenstein in Guanajuato?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- 十日性愛死
- Drehorte
- Guanajuato, Guanajuato, Mexiko(on location)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 2.472.000 € (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 34.282 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 9.823 $
- 7. Feb. 2016
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 91.916 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 45 Min.(105 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1