IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,0/10
13.653
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Zwei jugendliche Attentäter akzeptieren, was sie für einen schnellen und einfachen Job halten, bis ein unerwartetes Ziel sie aus ihrem Plan wirft.Zwei jugendliche Attentäter akzeptieren, was sie für einen schnellen und einfachen Job halten, bis ein unerwartetes Ziel sie aus ihrem Plan wirft.Zwei jugendliche Attentäter akzeptieren, was sie für einen schnellen und einfachen Job halten, bis ein unerwartetes Ziel sie aus ihrem Plan wirft.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Chris Colombo
- Hardware Store Perp
- (as Chris Columbo)
Francesca Chaney
- Doll Hospital Girl
- (Nicht genannt)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
this movie has almost it all. it includes friendship, money problem AND killing.. it's not a lame romantic movie, it makes you think and it is beautiful done! you should give it a try. I mean it's about two teenage girls who are not sure what to do with life and they are just trying to get enough money so they can buy some dresses, but when they think that all they have to do is kill someone they're wrong because it's so much more than that... they're about to learn such a big part in life and accepting how things are, try to make the most of the situation. this might not be a movie you'll re-watch but it's really enjoyable and very beautiful done. it's a movie which will leave you not empty, but not full it will leave you thinking.
Too Cute by Two, this is Another in the Girls with Guns Subgenre that can be Entertaining like Hana (2011) and Kick-Ass (2010). It also Borrows Heavily from that Tarantino Sensibility of Colorful Excess and Slightly Removed Ambiance. But there is Little Wit here that makes these Things Joyful Jaunts into Comic-Book Land.
The Movie Looks Good and the Actors All seem to be On but the Story is so Weak and the Dialog so Trite and the Side Characters and Stories are so Uninteresting that the Film comes off as an Idea not Realised and a Script from the Reject Pile that was Dusted Off but Never Polished.
In the End it is Attractive Visually but is not At All as much Fun as it Thinks it is and that is definitive Pretentiousness. The Lollipop Licking and the Bubble-Gum Blowing are more Cringe than Creative and more Obvious than Clever.
It is a Misfire that Overall, it really doesn't Matter because the Film is Shooting Blanks.
The Movie Looks Good and the Actors All seem to be On but the Story is so Weak and the Dialog so Trite and the Side Characters and Stories are so Uninteresting that the Film comes off as an Idea not Realised and a Script from the Reject Pile that was Dusted Off but Never Polished.
In the End it is Attractive Visually but is not At All as much Fun as it Thinks it is and that is definitive Pretentiousness. The Lollipop Licking and the Bubble-Gum Blowing are more Cringe than Creative and more Obvious than Clever.
It is a Misfire that Overall, it really doesn't Matter because the Film is Shooting Blanks.
6uwa
The movie starts with a great promise and packed with action. The idea of using innocence with cruelty is a great one. the cinematography is great too but once the story stays in one place for a long time than it gets a little bit boring. As soon as we learn why Gandolfini wants to die the movie is about good as over however it goes on for another 45 minutes or so.
I think Geoffrey Fletcher missed the point on this one. This could've been an action packed piece with a heart without being boring. It seems that he just didn't know how to achieve that sort of a formula.
However, this movie is not a total waste of time. It still has some interesting moments and good montage. Worth a watch.
I think Geoffrey Fletcher missed the point on this one. This could've been an action packed piece with a heart without being boring. It seems that he just didn't know how to achieve that sort of a formula.
However, this movie is not a total waste of time. It still has some interesting moments and good montage. Worth a watch.
This film tell the story of two young assassins who encounter a difficult situation when they do a job to finance the newest designer dress.
"Violet & Daisy" starts off exciting and very promising, as it successfully plays on the contrast between the angelic and innocent faces of the two leading girls, and they violent nature of what they do. However, the greatness was not sustained, and there is much slack after the intense beginning. The plot just dragged on with a lot of unneeded conversation. Though such scenes are to show their developing ambivalence towards their target, it becomes tiring and irritating. Why can't they just do it already! I think "Violet & Daisy" is an adequate film, and I really enjoy the two leading girls' performances. However, if there is more action thrown in that delays their kill, instead of just talking all the time, it would have been much better.
"Violet & Daisy" starts off exciting and very promising, as it successfully plays on the contrast between the angelic and innocent faces of the two leading girls, and they violent nature of what they do. However, the greatness was not sustained, and there is much slack after the intense beginning. The plot just dragged on with a lot of unneeded conversation. Though such scenes are to show their developing ambivalence towards their target, it becomes tiring and irritating. Why can't they just do it already! I think "Violet & Daisy" is an adequate film, and I really enjoy the two leading girls' performances. However, if there is more action thrown in that delays their kill, instead of just talking all the time, it would have been much better.
The movie is great at its best moments. And almost boring to death (no pun intended) in its worst. It's almost a shame that it does not find a way to stay even throughout. The two main actresses (Kudos for going that way, which also provides the movie with some of its best moments) are very different from each other. I'm not saying it's borderline cliché, but some people may expect a lot of the "twist" turns in the plot that the filmmaker thought of.
So while I would have loved to like it even more (I still think it's a decent movie overall), there are too many moments in it, that just don't work. On other news, it seems like someone was watching the Sopranos! You're not only getting Mr. Soprano himself (Mr. Gandolfini) in a completely different role, but you also get one of the regulars from that show to appear here.
So while I would have loved to like it even more (I still think it's a decent movie overall), there are too many moments in it, that just don't work. On other news, it seems like someone was watching the Sopranos! You're not only getting Mr. Soprano himself (Mr. Gandolfini) in a completely different role, but you also get one of the regulars from that show to appear here.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesCarey Mulligan was originally cast as Violet but opted to do Drive (2011) instead. She was replaced by Alexis Bledel.
- PatzerWhen the girls shoot their guns with their eyes closed, Violet's gun also empties with the slide back, but in the next shot she fires once more, and then again the gun has the slide in the empty position.
- Crazy CreditsUnder the main title "Violet & Daisy", it says in small letters: "In Hi-Fi, Color & Spectacular 2-D"
- VerbindungenReferences Tausendschönchen (1966)
- SoundtracksAngel of the Morning
Written by Chip Taylor
Performed by Merrilee Rush & The Turnabouts
Courtesy of Arista Records, Inc.
By arrangement with Sony Music Licensing
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Saoirse Ronan Through the Years
Saoirse Ronan Through the Years
Take a look back at Saoirse Ronan's movie career in photos.
- How long is Violet & Daisy?Powered by Alexa
- What is the song during the first shooting?
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Violet & Daisy - Jung. Unschuldig. Tödlich.
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 8.000.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 17.186 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 9.982 $
- 9. Juni 2013
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 108.139 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 28 Minuten
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen