Jede Geschichte beginnt mit einem Mord und einer erfolglosen Untersuchung. Doch mit der Zeit kommen neue Beweise ans Licht, die Wissenschaft entwickelt sich weiter und ermöglicht es den Stra... Alles lesenJede Geschichte beginnt mit einem Mord und einer erfolglosen Untersuchung. Doch mit der Zeit kommen neue Beweise ans Licht, die Wissenschaft entwickelt sich weiter und ermöglicht es den Strafverfolgungsbehörden, das Puzzle zusammenzusetzenJede Geschichte beginnt mit einem Mord und einer erfolglosen Untersuchung. Doch mit der Zeit kommen neue Beweise ans Licht, die Wissenschaft entwickelt sich weiter und ermöglicht es den Strafverfolgungsbehörden, das Puzzle zusammenzusetzen
Folgen durchsuchen
Fotos
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I literally want to end my life listening to all these so called experts on this show. They are aweful. And why do you need 4 or 5 of them. It takes away from the story. It's horrible. They talk like they are dumb not any expert. The forensic lady sounds like she's gasping for air after each word. It jumps from one person to the next, give one sentence. It's horrible. Please change all these people on the show and get better co host that sound smart. You only need 2 not 5. The cases are quite interesting. I've not heard alot of these. But it bounces around from one so called expert to the next and they don't sound like they are an expert in anything. This must be a Canadian show. Just by some accents but it's poorly set up.
How in the world was Christine Hannah selected to have a speaking role on this show? Simply horrible! Sounds like she has a mouthful of marbles. Combine that with zero personality behind what she says and I cringe when she speaks! Surely there were other choices. I have seen her on a few other shows and didn't understand it then. There are many other narrators on the show that speak beautiful and do not hurt the overall flow this otherwise good show.
If she is paid for this narration whatever she receives is too much. I am sure there are iewers that could do a better job and appear for free, in case the budget is the issue!
If she is paid for this narration whatever she receives is too much. I am sure there are iewers that could do a better job and appear for free, in case the budget is the issue!
The show is actually pretty good for a New true crime series. But it's PAINFUL to watch/listen to Christine Hannah. Please get a new expert to fill that spot if you create a new a season. Her contribution is dull, lifeless, and exhaustingly boring. The viewer is jolted out of the story and investigative procedure whenever her commentary comes in. Getting rid of her segments without a replacement would be better than having her in each episode. I hate to be so harsh but I have quit watching this show after about 1/2 of an episode each attempt (I tried watching 3 times) because it's so difficult to watch. And as a true crime junkie... there isn't much I wouldn't watch.
I came on here to figure out why the forensic specialist on the show sounds breathless and like her breath is being forced out. I haven't found any answers, but I agree with several other posters. Her manner of speaking distracts from the information she is conveying. It's an interesting show, but hard to listen to.
I like the details that they reveal and the show's overall format. However, some of the reinactments are clearly low budget. The episode featuring Thomas Mitchell has some terrible props. Judith Flagg is carrying a bundle with a horrible quality wig sticking out the top and it's meant to be her 8-month-old son.
I like the details that they reveal and the show's overall format. However, some of the reinactments are clearly low budget. The episode featuring Thomas Mitchell has some terrible props. Judith Flagg is carrying a bundle with a horrible quality wig sticking out the top and it's meant to be her 8-month-old son.
It's a great show, but perhaps subtitles for Christine Hannah might make her lines more understandable. She speaks as though she doesn't have enough air to finish her words or sentences. This makes it difficult to understand her. This is not a criticism of her, but perhaps she needs help to allow the viewers to get what she's trying to communicate. I often have to rewind to find out what she is saying.
Otherwise, the show is intriguing, well-delivered, thoughtful (especially to the families of the victims), and.pertinent to this day and age. There are lessons in this series for everyone. It is not a sensational series, yet it is informative.
Otherwise, the show is intriguing, well-delivered, thoughtful (especially to the families of the victims), and.pertinent to this day and age. There are lessons in this series for everyone. It is not a sensational series, yet it is informative.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesThis is among a group of real crime shows that feature certain "experts" talking about details of the crimes depicted, as if they were really involved in the cases. But it's the same "experts" talking about cases from all different places and times, so obviously none of them really were involved in any and are just reading from a script. Jeff Hamilton is the worst at reading scripts and pretending it's his experience.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Finally Caught have?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen