Rev.
- Fernsehserie
- 2010–2014
- 30 Min.
Die Missgeschicke eines anglikanischen Vikars, seiner Frau und einer kleinen, aber seltsamen Gruppe von Gemeindemitgliedern in London.Die Missgeschicke eines anglikanischen Vikars, seiner Frau und einer kleinen, aber seltsamen Gruppe von Gemeindemitgliedern in London.Die Missgeschicke eines anglikanischen Vikars, seiner Frau und einer kleinen, aber seltsamen Gruppe von Gemeindemitgliedern in London.
- 1 BAFTA Award gewonnen
- 7 Gewinne & 20 Nominierungen insgesamt
Folgen durchsuchen
Empfohlene Bewertungen
10lb-37433
This is a series I had to watch alone. My wife didn't enjoy it, found it to be odd and boring. Maybe it caught me at the right time. I was going through a faith transition, mini crisis, of my own and I was looking for alternatives to how I had been religiously programmed.
Not that Rev provides answers to existential crisis. But, he shows a religious order that though it is built on money and returns, it is handled by Rev with care and love. There is a tension throughout between the institution of church and the care of the parishioners. I felt Rev's acceptance.
There is the struggle over the popularity of Orthodoxy (as Rev compares the packed church next door with its harsh rules and dogmatics to his own sparsely attended sacrament administered based on the two great commandments of love).
The series seemed to climax in season three and it became a little sentimentally dramatic in the end with the comparison of Rev to a Christlike role. But, I still watched with interest through to the final scenes with the Cross.
It was humorous, ironic, thoughtful and timely for me.
I couldn't eat cereal while watching, because the crunch in my ears caused me to miss some of the dialogue.
Hope you enjoy it as much as I did.
Not that Rev provides answers to existential crisis. But, he shows a religious order that though it is built on money and returns, it is handled by Rev with care and love. There is a tension throughout between the institution of church and the care of the parishioners. I felt Rev's acceptance.
There is the struggle over the popularity of Orthodoxy (as Rev compares the packed church next door with its harsh rules and dogmatics to his own sparsely attended sacrament administered based on the two great commandments of love).
The series seemed to climax in season three and it became a little sentimentally dramatic in the end with the comparison of Rev to a Christlike role. But, I still watched with interest through to the final scenes with the Cross.
It was humorous, ironic, thoughtful and timely for me.
I couldn't eat cereal while watching, because the crunch in my ears caused me to miss some of the dialogue.
Hope you enjoy it as much as I did.
It's not terribly exciting, and there are seldom any real plots, and very little actually happens, but it's a very nice story of an English vicar trying to do his best to please everyone around him. Tom Hollander is a great character actor but he struggles to be the lead in this -- the rest of the cast is so good it doesn't really matter. All in all, Rev. Is a nice place to land when you want a respite from the intense serious drama occupying most of the space on tv today.
I finally gave this show a go, for the last episode in the series, and it's left me completely bewildered as to what all the fuss has been about. I had tried it once previously only to find the credit sequence so annoying that I switched it off.
But, having read rave reviews in the press (Guardian, Telegraph, Standard), with columnists dubbing it 'brilliant', feting it as a masterpiece and praising the performances, I steeled myself to try again.
I really wish I hadn't bothered.
I found Tom Hollander entirely unprepossessing in a vaguely irritating way. His relationship with wife Olivia Colman had no ring of truth – their absurd polite arm's-length behaviour made it seem like they didn't know each other at all but had just been deposited on the same set together that day. She was phonily perky like someone instructed to alter her tone to 'jolly' and 'upbeat' as if talking to a child in need of special encouragement.
They are supported by a cast of characters who all have faces that you want to slap.
Is it meant to be a comedy? There was no humour in it, not a single funny line, bar the chap professing himself to be very good at humility.
I have never had much sympathy for self-indulgent people who lie in bed moping all day after a setback, as the lead did in this episode. After all, he has a wife, child and people who appear to respect him despite the fact that he comes across as a bit dim and self-centred.
Thank goodness this wasn't some gem that had passed me by but rather a travesty of a comedy/drama/whatever (I couldn't really tell), purporting to be intellectual and appealing for some reason to the moneyed upper-middle classes.
But, having read rave reviews in the press (Guardian, Telegraph, Standard), with columnists dubbing it 'brilliant', feting it as a masterpiece and praising the performances, I steeled myself to try again.
I really wish I hadn't bothered.
I found Tom Hollander entirely unprepossessing in a vaguely irritating way. His relationship with wife Olivia Colman had no ring of truth – their absurd polite arm's-length behaviour made it seem like they didn't know each other at all but had just been deposited on the same set together that day. She was phonily perky like someone instructed to alter her tone to 'jolly' and 'upbeat' as if talking to a child in need of special encouragement.
They are supported by a cast of characters who all have faces that you want to slap.
Is it meant to be a comedy? There was no humour in it, not a single funny line, bar the chap professing himself to be very good at humility.
I have never had much sympathy for self-indulgent people who lie in bed moping all day after a setback, as the lead did in this episode. After all, he has a wife, child and people who appear to respect him despite the fact that he comes across as a bit dim and self-centred.
Thank goodness this wasn't some gem that had passed me by but rather a travesty of a comedy/drama/whatever (I couldn't really tell), purporting to be intellectual and appealing for some reason to the moneyed upper-middle classes.
If only Olivia Coleman weren't in this. Basically, this should be the story of an inner city vicar who is not really sure if he's making a difference. So if Olivia Coleman's character didn't exist, everything would be fine.
He could lust after the beautiful principal of the school, he could question his vocation and he could get a chance to openly discuss religion in a modern sitcom and that might be really helpful.
But it's hard to understand how these two people would even meet, let alone have sex or get married. They don't seem to know each other and they don't seem to have anything in common. It's like they just added her in as an afterthought.
So she is dressing up like a prostitute in the local convenience store to enhance their sex life and he's questioning the nature of existence. Just doesn't make any sense.
You would think that someone in his situation who decided to marry would be really in love and pretty certain about what they want to do with their life. I almost think she forgets what his job is.
Anyway, they have wonderful actors and they are all wasted with an absurd plot line.
He could lust after the beautiful principal of the school, he could question his vocation and he could get a chance to openly discuss religion in a modern sitcom and that might be really helpful.
But it's hard to understand how these two people would even meet, let alone have sex or get married. They don't seem to know each other and they don't seem to have anything in common. It's like they just added her in as an afterthought.
So she is dressing up like a prostitute in the local convenience store to enhance their sex life and he's questioning the nature of existence. Just doesn't make any sense.
You would think that someone in his situation who decided to marry would be really in love and pretty certain about what they want to do with their life. I almost think she forgets what his job is.
Anyway, they have wonderful actors and they are all wasted with an absurd plot line.
I am catching up with the this show on the Drama TV channel, as I missed it when it was originally broadcast, it's supposedly BAFTA nominated though I really can't imagine what self respecting individual would wish to recommend this.
It's choc full of cartoon characters thrown together into some form of social tombola, the main character the 'Rev' of the title is Reverend Adam Smallbone, is the ineffectual vicar in a London parish so overly keen, and eager to please absolutely everyone, that he actually manages to please virtually no one.
This includes his long suffering spouse Alex, who it would appear wants to start a family rather than be a vicars wife, is constantly frustrated by the seemingly perpetual demands of his vacation.
The Archdeacon Robert seems to me that he considers the church as a business endeavour, as he spends his entire time acting as a form of middle manager, nipping around in his subsidised motor being paid, to chivvy the Rev into "meeting church defined arbitrary 'Targets'"
A character Adoha Onyeka is someone that I really can't understand how she fits in around the church, I expect I haven't watched enough episodes to realise if she volunteers her time there, what really surprises me is her attitude towards the Rev.
The character Colin Lambert is an archetypal layabout, who appears to use the Revs church as a virtual doss house, who loves to scrounge on the Revs generosity, at every available opportunity.
It's choc full of cartoon characters thrown together into some form of social tombola, the main character the 'Rev' of the title is Reverend Adam Smallbone, is the ineffectual vicar in a London parish so overly keen, and eager to please absolutely everyone, that he actually manages to please virtually no one.
This includes his long suffering spouse Alex, who it would appear wants to start a family rather than be a vicars wife, is constantly frustrated by the seemingly perpetual demands of his vacation.
The Archdeacon Robert seems to me that he considers the church as a business endeavour, as he spends his entire time acting as a form of middle manager, nipping around in his subsidised motor being paid, to chivvy the Rev into "meeting church defined arbitrary 'Targets'"
A character Adoha Onyeka is someone that I really can't understand how she fits in around the church, I expect I haven't watched enough episodes to realise if she volunteers her time there, what really surprises me is her attitude towards the Rev.
The character Colin Lambert is an archetypal layabout, who appears to use the Revs church as a virtual doss house, who loves to scrounge on the Revs generosity, at every available opportunity.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAs well as guest starring as celebrity clergyman 'Roland Wise' Hugh Bonneville is also a huge fan of the show
- PatzerArchdeacon Robert is show a few times to be worried about what the Dean has to say, giving the impression that a Dean is above him in the church. The truth is that each Archdeaconry is divided into several Deanery establishments, so the opposite is true.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Breakfast: Folge vom 24. Juni 2010 (2010)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How many seasons does Rev. have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen