What's a Girl to Do?

I felt obliged to review this when I saw that someone, anyone, had given it more than '1'. Let's be clear, this is the 1 on any scale of 1 to 10.

The script is random, illogical plotlines like the blind auction gone wrong, or just might be people sitting around a table just ranting about how terrible vaccines are or similar right wing talking points.

Having said that I enjoyed watching it immensely. Every single line is left hanging, all the timing is way out. I'm not even sure why it is so engaging but every time the laugh track cuts in to a line that doesn't contain a joke, or occasionally fails to be used when there is a joke, I feel a sense of completion. Some of the episodes are online in full thanks to the creators and it is not to be missed.

Jaw-droppingly bad. Let's look at some of the issues: 1. Wooden acting. Much of the dialogue is delivered in pretty much the same way a group of high school students asked to read through a script for the first time would do it. Speaking of which, 2. Reading from the script. The actors are doing, this, literally and blatantly.

3. Cringe dialogue. You've heard of shows ripped straight from the headlines? This is dialogue ripped straight from your MAGA aunt's facebook timeline. I can appreciate a show presenting a different perspective from mine, but only if it's done well.

4. Random laugh track. The imaginary audience laughs uproariously at lines that weren't obviously intended to be funny. It's weird.

Imagine All in the Family, but written by John McEntee, played straight, and starring Kevin Sorbo and Laura Loomer.

Ignoring the politics, any film or tv fan must notice how bad this is.

Strange soft focus, the laugh track seems off. I couldn't tell if that was a delayed audience or the timing was out.

Audio sounds like it was recorded in a bucket, which would, at least, obscure the view. Talking of which, this looks like it was dragged out of the late 80s.

The acting. Oh dear gods, the acting. No chemistry, all stilted and like its a skit. The guy with the long hair overacting in every scene is amazing. Was there a director or was it just being guessed at?

This pilot looks and feels like it was AI generated without the humour that comes with that failing.

Oh, and its stuffed full of a single political point of view, so rather than playing off each other - enjoy a lecture that can only take a topic shallow due to time constraints and try and fit a joke in. Imagine Veronica's Closet tackling Theoretical Physics. Badly.

A lecture with jokes would have been funnier and might have got the point across better.

This sitcom is the worst trash I've ever seen. It uses lame studio sitcoms tropes like horrible dad jokes, implausible plot devices, unrealistic characters and situations and laugh tracks at nauseam; seriously this show makes those horrible 1980's tgif sitcoms look like Frazier; the lead actress is the worst actor on the whole set who the hell casted her. It some how manages to be more melodramatic than a show like full house but still have less heart; I honestly do not see this show lasting in any way unless the creators have a rich uncle who passes away and leaves them a fortune; avoid this show at all cost.

Can't believe this exists. The acting is terrible. The production is seriously the worst I have ever seen. What is with the laugh track? There are laughs in the weirdest places in the show. The script is just so hard to follow, they don't show or build up any context.

Lastly the title "What's a girl to do?" She is in her 60's, she hasn't been a girl for 45 plus years.

They are really trying too hard to establish themselves as super hardcore MAGA good guys. I just can't believe that someone paid money to have this made. I am now just typing to get the amount of characters to leave this post, there is no more to say about this pile of.