IMDb-BEWERTUNG
6,1/10
12.751
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein akribischer Gärtner, der sich der Pflege eines schönen Anwesens widmet und seinem Arbeitgeber, der reichen Witwe, zu Diensten ist.Ein akribischer Gärtner, der sich der Pflege eines schönen Anwesens widmet und seinem Arbeitgeber, der reichen Witwe, zu Diensten ist.Ein akribischer Gärtner, der sich der Pflege eines schönen Anwesens widmet und seinem Arbeitgeber, der reichen Witwe, zu Diensten ist.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 7 Nominierungen insgesamt
Christian Vaughn
- John
- (as Christian Freeman)
Emily Russell
- Waitress
- (as Emily C. Russell)
Monica R. Harris
- Female Host
- (as Monica Harris)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I have to say, I haven't seen any of the other two movies part of this thematic trilogy, but as far as I know they're independent stories.
To start with, the story is nothing original. It's been done many times before, and better.
The story of a guy with a dark past and set of skills, retired from that life, trying to live a quiet life in a small job, but trouble comes up and the guy goes back to old habits.
I know, that's not all there is here, but the rest, honestly, didn't blow my mind neither. I just didn't connect with the characters or what they do. And it's actually weird, because I do like gardening and nature in general, but it just didn't click for me.
Also, I felt the visual aspect wasn't great. I get the pale colour palette, but still, the shots didn't catch my eye or made an impression, except for the monotony and bland character of it. I know many won't be so exigent with this aspect, but I consider it an important aspect and with so many great cinematographers in the industry, if a movie doesn't have this aspect covered, I feel frustrated and disappointed. After all, movies are a visual form of entertainment, which include other many aspects, but it's a visual thing first!
Besides all that technical criticism, I found the ending quite weird, awkward, a bit cheesy and even slightly nonsensical at some degree, considering the character Norma (S. Weaver).
On the performances side, everyone give solid acts, that's the strongest point of the movie for sure.
Quite a disappointment, I was expecting this to be a solid movie, but it ended up being a mediocre piece, for me.
To start with, the story is nothing original. It's been done many times before, and better.
The story of a guy with a dark past and set of skills, retired from that life, trying to live a quiet life in a small job, but trouble comes up and the guy goes back to old habits.
I know, that's not all there is here, but the rest, honestly, didn't blow my mind neither. I just didn't connect with the characters or what they do. And it's actually weird, because I do like gardening and nature in general, but it just didn't click for me.
Also, I felt the visual aspect wasn't great. I get the pale colour palette, but still, the shots didn't catch my eye or made an impression, except for the monotony and bland character of it. I know many won't be so exigent with this aspect, but I consider it an important aspect and with so many great cinematographers in the industry, if a movie doesn't have this aspect covered, I feel frustrated and disappointed. After all, movies are a visual form of entertainment, which include other many aspects, but it's a visual thing first!
Besides all that technical criticism, I found the ending quite weird, awkward, a bit cheesy and even slightly nonsensical at some degree, considering the character Norma (S. Weaver).
On the performances side, everyone give solid acts, that's the strongest point of the movie for sure.
Quite a disappointment, I was expecting this to be a solid movie, but it ended up being a mediocre piece, for me.
I didn't expect much and sat for a typical plot for a typical genre. The movie started slow but went to a climax quicker than I though. The core of the film impressed me the most when you realised the garden is a symbol of life and your choice in life will nourish what comes of it. It's not too late for anythingand there's always achance to have a garden full of colours and energy.
I guess we all had to make choices in life and there and that's why there is something for everyone in this movie.
You're in it for a treat. Good writing and a better cast is something that you don't see these days.
I guess we all had to make choices in life and there and that's why there is something for everyone in this movie.
You're in it for a treat. Good writing and a better cast is something that you don't see these days.
This movie reminds me of "American Beauty". Both had the main character as the narrator and had a philosophical/ melodramatic feel. However, the "Master Gardner" (MG) felt short.
Movies should show, and don't need to tell. Show is the fundamental, and tell can enhance the show. MG tells a bit too much, but doesn't show enough.
One key miss: how did Narvel and Maya develop their chemistry? We understand the rationale - both needed a second chance - as they told the audience but didn't show enough, so it felt arbitrary.
How did Narvel become a changed man? The was some evidence but it didn't show enough to be convincing.
But overall, it's still an entertaining movie and I enjoyed watching it.
Movies should show, and don't need to tell. Show is the fundamental, and tell can enhance the show. MG tells a bit too much, but doesn't show enough.
One key miss: how did Narvel and Maya develop their chemistry? We understand the rationale - both needed a second chance - as they told the audience but didn't show enough, so it felt arbitrary.
How did Narvel become a changed man? The was some evidence but it didn't show enough to be convincing.
But overall, it's still an entertaining movie and I enjoyed watching it.
As the movie opens we witness Joel Edgerton as Master Gardener
Narvel Roth writing in his journal with narration. What we first see of him is a mystery, but at 22 minutes in he takes off his shirt and the tattoos paint an uneasy picture of who he might be. Or at least who he was at one time.
He is employed by Sigourney Weaver as the Dowager Norma Haverhill who owns the mansion and the grounds that are a masterful garden. He also has a small staff and he spends time each day teaching them some of the finer points of gardening.
Norma approaches him, she has a request. Her grandniece, a young lady of "mixed blood", will be coming on, the hope is that she can be trained as a gardener. She will get minimum wage at first and will be provided transportation. And, since Norma is up in age, maybe the young lady can ultimately take over and carry on the family tradition. She is played by Quintessa Swindell as Maya Core.
My wife and I recognized right away that it must have been filmed in Louisiana and in fact it was, St. Francisville and New Orleans, primarily. The New Orleans scenes not far from where my wife grew up, on the West Bank.
This is a really good movie, with solid and interesting character studies of the three main characters. Each actor gives a fine performance. What you were doesn't necessarily dictate what you will become.
At home, on DVD from our public library.
He is employed by Sigourney Weaver as the Dowager Norma Haverhill who owns the mansion and the grounds that are a masterful garden. He also has a small staff and he spends time each day teaching them some of the finer points of gardening.
Norma approaches him, she has a request. Her grandniece, a young lady of "mixed blood", will be coming on, the hope is that she can be trained as a gardener. She will get minimum wage at first and will be provided transportation. And, since Norma is up in age, maybe the young lady can ultimately take over and carry on the family tradition. She is played by Quintessa Swindell as Maya Core.
My wife and I recognized right away that it must have been filmed in Louisiana and in fact it was, St. Francisville and New Orleans, primarily. The New Orleans scenes not far from where my wife grew up, on the West Bank.
This is a really good movie, with solid and interesting character studies of the three main characters. Each actor gives a fine performance. What you were doesn't necessarily dictate what you will become.
At home, on DVD from our public library.
I had just watched 'You Hurt My Feelings' before this one, a very poor effort at trying to make some emotions for its story, but then I stumbled upon this movie accidentally. Wow. What a difference it makes. Not only had it top-class acting in every department, but also a story so well told, I was constantly wondering where it was going. Will it be bloody as hell (what I expected), or something completely different? Real emotions ran deep in this movie, never over-explained any of them at all. The direction is spot-on, obviously, as so the score and editing. It has been simply the best effort about human emotions since I saw 'Fathers and Daughters' back in 2015.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesIn a 2022 interview with The Hollywood Reporter, Paul Schrader spoke about how the style of the film serves to create an atmosphere of unease and unfamiliarity: "Well, there is a coldness; there's a withheld-ness - in the performance, in the production design. There's not much furniture around, and what's with those jellyfish on the wallpaper? So there's a kind of distance, which is intentional. And that little room he lives in, which makes no sense. So, yes, you're using those stylistic elements to make the viewer feel that there is a gap between what you want to feel and what you do feel. And that's a calculated gap that you create stylistically - sometimes by use of the camera, more often by not using the camera, by not giving certain things. It creates a sense of unease, that makes you feel, 'this could be a story I know very well, but somehow I'm looking at it and I don't think I know it very well at all.'
- PatzerThe pudding Narval eats at his dinner with Norma grows back into the plate when the camera angle changes, than vanishes again at the last shot from afar.
- Zitate
Narvel Roth: Gardening is a belief in the future. A belief that things will happen according to plan.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Master Gardener?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Usta Bahçıvan
- Drehorte
- Dots Diner, Kenner, Louisiana, USA(Diner where he meets the marshalls)
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 667.114 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 264.866 $
- 21. Mai 2023
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 1.506.008 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 51 Min.(111 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen