Wild Things 4

Let's face it. The "Wild Things" films are never going to be confused with serious, art house cinema. They are lots of fun to watch though and if you are in a mood for escapist fare, they fit the bill just fine. The latest entry "Wild Things: Foursome" follows the formula of drop dead gorgeous women, eroticism, double crossing, slick production, and moody music. I rather liked this entry. The performances are pretty good, especially by veteran actor John Schneider, and I got a kick out of the multiple twists in the plot. The Florida location is also put to good use. It's not surprising that all of the "Wild Things" movies have been shot there. It will be interesting to see if they come up with a fifth film. Recommended.

(2009) Wild Things: Foursome THRILLER/ DRAMA

You know a movie is bad when it starts off with a bunch of teens getting excited over a couple of yuppies playing foosball on a sunny resort near a pool! And like the other "Wild Things" films known for it's twists, it's still quite bad with it's mediocre acting from a bunch of wannabes and a fake making out scene involving a single guy and three other girls, hence the title! Centers on a father who was killed in a racing accident and the spoiled brat of a teenage son finding a way to collect it's inheritance. Even after showing the film's credits making everything to make sense, one still has to go through all the bad acting and idiocy that makes things that turn out the way they do possible.

Greed, lust, envy, anger, pride, gluttony, sloth, anger Sex...more sex and more sex.

Short of being porn, this is just enough to make the movie solid without making it porn.

Along the lines of the other Wildthings and very similar to the first movie, this tells the story of pure lucid greed and how they go to get more.

Entertaining, but not memorable.

However, you may learn a thing or two from watching this...

Beautiful women in Florida are everywhere and always after one thing...

Don't trust a lawyer.

The detective in this is one of the better things in this, but also one of it's weak links. Then again, I don't think anyone will watch this, trying to figure out, which one is the better actor in here. Still pretty decent acting going on overall (that does not include everyone in the cast), even though the cast does not wear that much during the movies duration.

Of course, I'd advice you to watch the first one. This is already the 3-rd cash-in, though as I've said, it seems as bit of an improvement to the other two "sequels" (they are not, just re-telling the story of the first one). I wonder if a fifth part, will top the "erotic" scene with a fifth member. Then again, it was pretty obvious that one actress had a "no nudity" clause in her contract. But I don't think that will put you off.

While pretty silly (no pun intended), it might be funny at times for you, depending what you expect.

The first "Wild things" was hardy a classic . Nobody really wanted a sequel, but Hollywood still made 2 crappy straight to DVD movies. The sequels were INCREDIBLY LAZY. They were basically remakes of the first movie only with small changes in script and of course anonymous cast . I guess they did make some money , because Hollywood made one more.

What's the difference between this movie and the earlier ones ? Hint: it's in the title. Yep, guy has a sex with 3 women this time , not with 2. The rest ? EVERYTHING ELSE IS JUST THE SAME. If you find this movie to be clever or surprising , well , then clearly something is wrong with you.

The first movie had Kevin Bacon , Bill Murray , Denise Richards and Neve Campbell. Good actors and hot women. The sex scene was great and there was quite a lot of erotic tension too.

Here the direction is unremarkable , the screenplay is flat and predictable. There is only one sex scene here (the foursome) and although it's nice it can't hold a candle to the original threesome from the first movie. The girls are quite pretty , but when it comes to acting ,wait , what acting ? The only actor from this movie that interested me was a guy named Ashley Parker Angel. This dude should seriously change his name , unless he is interested in making career in porn.

I don't remember too much from this movie. The whole movie is so uninspired and uninteresting that I can recommend it only for sex maniacs (who probably were the main target for this movie anyway). I give it 1/10.