Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuFollows an event planner who must organize the perfect wedding for her sister in less than a month.Follows an event planner who must organize the perfect wedding for her sister in less than a month.Follows an event planner who must organize the perfect wedding for her sister in less than a month.
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Loved all the characters but the only decent relationship was the sisters. No romance at all. The best story was with the two older sisters. There could have been much more with them. Basically, good acting and bad execution with the story.
I really like Fiona Gubelmann and wanted to love this movie. It was nice but not much of a romance. The settings were beautiful but the constant obstacles plot has been used so many times that it ended up kind of boring. The lead actor is a great second lead as a best friend but he doesn't act like a romantic lead. There were no sparks at all between the two leads. They seemed like brother and sister until the very last minute of the movie. And one more thing- worst boutonnière ever on the dad's tuxedo.
Linda Thorson and Michele Scarabelli as the heart of this nice film about relation between siblings, place of childhood and youth, reconciliation after long time, a fundamental decision and the happy solution.
For .Antonio Cayonne , just applauses for fair manner to explore his role.
A nice film for its flavors of nostalgia and delicate sketch of romance.
For .Antonio Cayonne , just applauses for fair manner to explore his role.
A nice film for its flavors of nostalgia and delicate sketch of romance.
PROs:
The acting was good. Everyone did the best with what was given to them.
The script, like most newer movies, had an absence of the standard tropes or the tropes were done differently.
The scenery was nice, filmed at Harrison Hot Springs in BC and nearby Abbotsford. (We like to Google and check maps and images to figure out where exactly it was filmed).
It had a different vibe than expected.
It tries to be deep and philosophical, and sometimes it works.
CONs: In the noble effort to diversify, it is given precedence over personality. The leads had absolutely no romantic chemistry whatsoever. They would be friends, that's it.
The male lead was absent for a good chunk of the movie. The romance was nonexistent, and unnecessary.
The show tried to infuse drama, but it ended up forced and maudlin ( I looked that word up to be sure it was appropriate for this situation). Tears here and there in several parts of the movie. Way overdone and would have been more effective if used sparingly.
The ending was rushed and wrapped up quickly with no knowledge of what happened to make it all okay. We had to guess.
A voice over narrative at the beginning and ending which many would see as a nice touch, I found didn't make complete sense because I listened to what was actually said. The end voice gave reference to the title, which was made to sound more meaningful than it was. Or I just didn't get it.
The movie is all style over substance.
This weekend's premieres, for the first time ever, bombed, imho.
I was going to give it a 6, but going over what I wrote, I can't give it above a 5.
A waste of good actors.
Many will love it, as there is no Hallmark movie where someone doesn't say it's their favorite and they watch it over and over. #thevowswekeep SMH.
The script, like most newer movies, had an absence of the standard tropes or the tropes were done differently.
The scenery was nice, filmed at Harrison Hot Springs in BC and nearby Abbotsford. (We like to Google and check maps and images to figure out where exactly it was filmed).
It had a different vibe than expected.
It tries to be deep and philosophical, and sometimes it works.
CONs: In the noble effort to diversify, it is given precedence over personality. The leads had absolutely no romantic chemistry whatsoever. They would be friends, that's it.
The male lead was absent for a good chunk of the movie. The romance was nonexistent, and unnecessary.
The show tried to infuse drama, but it ended up forced and maudlin ( I looked that word up to be sure it was appropriate for this situation). Tears here and there in several parts of the movie. Way overdone and would have been more effective if used sparingly.
The ending was rushed and wrapped up quickly with no knowledge of what happened to make it all okay. We had to guess.
A voice over narrative at the beginning and ending which many would see as a nice touch, I found didn't make complete sense because I listened to what was actually said. The end voice gave reference to the title, which was made to sound more meaningful than it was. Or I just didn't get it.
The movie is all style over substance.
This weekend's premieres, for the first time ever, bombed, imho.
I was going to give it a 6, but going over what I wrote, I can't give it above a 5.
A waste of good actors.
Many will love it, as there is no Hallmark movie where someone doesn't say it's their favorite and they watch it over and over. #thevowswekeep SMH.
The reviewer mamachikn captures many of my thoughts. Decent acting. The premise of selling the family business is common, but after that the details are done a bit differently. The dialogue is just ok. There is some beautiful scenary.
Fiona Gubelmann and Antonio Cayonne have an understated chemistry. It's there, but it's quiet.
This is a story about family, especially sisters. We have two sets of sisters, one set starts out estranged and the other models the ideal. As a result of the emphasis on those relationships, the romance story doesn't get as much attention as some viewers may be used to.
Fiona Gubelmann and Antonio Cayonne have an understated chemistry. It's there, but it's quiet.
This is a story about family, especially sisters. We have two sets of sisters, one set starts out estranged and the other models the ideal. As a result of the emphasis on those relationships, the romance story doesn't get as much attention as some viewers may be used to.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
Details
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen