Am 8. Februar 1977 nahm Kiritsis den Meridian-Mortgage-Präsidenten Hall als Geisel, mit einer Schrotflinte, die per "Totmann-Draht" an seinen Hals gebunden war.Am 8. Februar 1977 nahm Kiritsis den Meridian-Mortgage-Präsidenten Hall als Geisel, mit einer Schrotflinte, die per "Totmann-Draht" an seinen Hals gebunden war.Am 8. Februar 1977 nahm Kiritsis den Meridian-Mortgage-Präsidenten Hall als Geisel, mit einer Schrotflinte, die per "Totmann-Draht" an seinen Hals gebunden war.
- Regisseur/-in
- Autor/-in
- Stars
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 Gewinn & 3 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
At a time when many of us may feel like we're being systematically shafted by big business and powerful financial institutions, it's natural that some of us might feel justified in seeking retribution against them for their deceitful actions. Such was also the case in February 1977, when an aggrieved borrower sought potentially deadly vengeance against the president of an Indianapolis mortgage company, as seen in this fact-based comedy-drama-thriller from director Gus Van Sant. When Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård), a mentally challenged borrower, felt financially betrayed by a lender he implicitly trusted, he decided to take action to get back at the loan company's owner, M. L. Hall (Al Pacino). However, on the day he was scheduled to meet with Mr. Hall, Kiritsis learned that he was on a last-minute midwinter "business trip" to Florida, thereby thwarting his plans for revenge. So, with his principal intention thus foiled, the angry customer resorted to his fallback plan, taking the owner's son, Richard (Dacre Montgomery), as hostage. And, to show the world he meant business, the perpetrator fitted his captive with a taut wire around his neck that was connected to a shotgun set to fire with the slightest unplanned motion. However, despite his seemingly efficient planning, the determined but somewhat bumbling culprit ended up launching what would turn out to be a cross between a heinous criminal event and a comical media circus that mesmerized the city for days. Law enforcement officials, like Kiritsis's acquaintance, Det. Michael Grable (Cary Elwes), were frustrated by developments at nearly every turn, while many in the public at large sympathized with the captor's seemingly justifiable motives. And, in the process, the event exploded to draw in a variety of ancillary storylines, such as the determined campaign of a neophyte television reporter (Myha'la) aggressively seeking to lock down coverage of her first breakthrough story and the improvised negotiation efforts of a popular local radio host (Colman Domingo) who was trusted by the event's ringmaster who was unwittingly drawn into the fray. The result is an accurate re-enactment of a potentially dangerous event that ultimately plays out like a classic example of pure Americana kitsch, a film that calls to mind elements found in such releases as "Dog Day Afternoon" (1975) and "Breaking" (2022). However, despite the picture's commendable efforts at re-creating a scenario that has largely slipped from public memory over the years, this release feels as though it tries a little too hard at times, as if it's wearing its penchant for period piece authenticity on its sleeve. In addition, portions of the narrative drag somewhat in the middle, coming across like padding to fill out the easily trimmed 1:45:00 runtime. Those criticisms aside, however, "Dead Man's Wire" nevertheless features an excellent production design, along with fine performances by Domingo, Pacino, and, especially, Skarsgård. This modestly entertaining offering generally holds viewer interest reasonably well, providing a modicum of gripping drama and more than a few well-earned chuckles along the way. If nothing else, however, the story should serve as a warning to those who would try to pull one over on an increasingly unsettled, unpredictable, trigger-happy public, one whose imbedded lesson strongly cautions that cost of calculated financial scheming could easily overshadow whatever profits might come from such artful material deception.
I saw this film at the AFI Film Festival in Hollywood. I had not heard of this story before and when the chyron came on saying "based on a true story" I had my doubts - remember Fargo? Anyway, it is really a true story of a man (Bill Skarsgard) who kidnaps a mortgage company executive whom he believes cheated him. Skarsgard is outstanding as the man with a mission to get his money back and the supporting cast is good. Pacino's role is very limited but of course he is good as the executive's father. Direction by Gus Van Sant is good and the period recreations are well done with Louisville filling in for Indianapolis where the event actually occurred (I happened to talk to a gentlemen who sat next to me at another movie and he confirmed the location and accuracy of the movie). Bottom line - recommended for true crime fans.
Watched at the 2025 Toronto International Film Festival.
Gus Van Sant has always been a fascinating director as his works on Elephant, Good Will Hunting, Gerry, To Die For, Last Days, and Paranoid Park are some of my favorite indie art-house movies ever. Since his last movie in seven years, Van Sant brings a slick, tense and comedic tale about the kidnapping and crime moment by Tony Kiritsis and the tension surrounding the event.
Throughout, the production designs, Van Sant's direction and the atmosphere is strong. It helps build a sense of it's time period and the characters that are situated in this tense moment. What Van Sant succeeds is grasping the characters motives, understand their personalities and see through them as human. Paralleling themes about the corrupted and flawed system behind the mortgage and money business, and the conflicts it creates. The writing, while it is pretty straight-forward and predictable, is solid as some of the themes and concepts explored are interesting.
All of the performances are pretty good. Bill Skarsard is absolutely fantastic, alongside with the rest of the cast members. I do wish some of the pacing in the second act and certain dialogue moments could improve as some of the moments did feel a bit overlong or strangely paced at times. But overall, it's nice to see Van Sant still got it with his talents.
Gus Van Sant has always been a fascinating director as his works on Elephant, Good Will Hunting, Gerry, To Die For, Last Days, and Paranoid Park are some of my favorite indie art-house movies ever. Since his last movie in seven years, Van Sant brings a slick, tense and comedic tale about the kidnapping and crime moment by Tony Kiritsis and the tension surrounding the event.
Throughout, the production designs, Van Sant's direction and the atmosphere is strong. It helps build a sense of it's time period and the characters that are situated in this tense moment. What Van Sant succeeds is grasping the characters motives, understand their personalities and see through them as human. Paralleling themes about the corrupted and flawed system behind the mortgage and money business, and the conflicts it creates. The writing, while it is pretty straight-forward and predictable, is solid as some of the themes and concepts explored are interesting.
All of the performances are pretty good. Bill Skarsard is absolutely fantastic, alongside with the rest of the cast members. I do wish some of the pacing in the second act and certain dialogue moments could improve as some of the moments did feel a bit overlong or strangely paced at times. But overall, it's nice to see Van Sant still got it with his talents.
Al Pacino receives top billing in this true-life story, though he's probably in the film no more than five or ten minutes. So, if you're watching it for him, you'll likely feel hoodwinked!
The story is about a real person, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård). In 1977, Kiritsis entered mortgage company office...taking the president hostage and rigging him up with a 'dead man's wire'...a harness of sorts attached to a shotgun aimed at the president! In other words, if police tried to stop Kiritsis, the gun would go off. Why did he do this desperate act? Well, he felt like the company had ruined him financially...stealing his idea for a shopping mall. What happened after? See the film.
The acting is generally very good (though Pacino does seem to ham it up a bit) and the story is interesting. However, it's also a film you could either watch or just read the Wikipedia article about Kiritsis. Now I am not saying it's a bad film in any way...it's very good. But the story is simple and if you just want to know how it all works out, read the article.
The story is about a real person, Tony Kiritsis (Bill Skarsgård). In 1977, Kiritsis entered mortgage company office...taking the president hostage and rigging him up with a 'dead man's wire'...a harness of sorts attached to a shotgun aimed at the president! In other words, if police tried to stop Kiritsis, the gun would go off. Why did he do this desperate act? Well, he felt like the company had ruined him financially...stealing his idea for a shopping mall. What happened after? See the film.
The acting is generally very good (though Pacino does seem to ham it up a bit) and the story is interesting. However, it's also a film you could either watch or just read the Wikipedia article about Kiritsis. Now I am not saying it's a bad film in any way...it's very good. But the story is simple and if you just want to know how it all works out, read the article.
Any experienced screenwriter offered a chance to write this story - about a mentally ill guy who takes a mortgage broker hostage - would immediately ask himself, "Who's the hero? From whose POV do I tell the story?" The writer here decided to tell the story from the deranged kidnapper's POV. A fatal mistake. We have no way in. No rooting interest. A heartless enterprise. Barren and amoral. An impeccably made bore.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesDead Man's Wire is partially based on the documentary Dead Man's Line (2018)
- PatzerThere are a few questionable items & phrases that either were not popular or didn't exist in 1977. "Kerfuffle" wasn't used in the US until the late 1990's, and Sugar-free baked goods would not have been easily available. They were most sought after for diabetics. If Richard Hall was seeking them out, the logic is- he was diabetic. But, that is not mentioned or ever an issue during his captivity, so this detail seems irrelevant.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
2025 TIFF Festival Guide
See the current lineup for the 50th Toronto International Film Festival this September.
Details
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 45 Min.(105 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen






