The Sketch Artist (Portrait - Robot)

I have been a forensic specialist for 50 years. I have seen every movie x 5. Sick of searching for something new and then i stumbled on this. It's not the plots, it's the characters. I particularly like the forensic scientist. Shades of the bbc series, silent witness, and not quite so good bec it's too quick. I like silent witness for its slow pace and multi episode format. Also the relationships are given, and have been given, lots of time to develop. Apart from that, some of the plot lines in the sketch artist are intriguing - even if you've seen them x5. I will watch this to the end without feeling this it time i will never get back.

Full marks..

Like the other reviewer mentioned, this is a very watchable show. Yes, there are obvious choices in characters and surroundings, but that's because it works! Just like how I hate it when they implement all sorts of weird or new factors to a romantic comedy, when all we always want to see is girl meets boy, something happens that keeps them apart, but they find eachother in the end. With detectives it's the same. And does it have to be completely credible? No, then I'll watch the news for what actually happens in the world.

What I also like is how they combine old detective work with new methods, exact with less exact science, and use electronics and social media like they are actually used nowadays.

The only downside to this old (en new) skool detective show is that they always have to use grewsome storylines. And since having a baby my mind does not want to handle this anymore while watching a show for fun. But this show kept me fascinated enough to overrule that feeling. Hoping to see the next season soon.

The trouble is though that the prémisses and the characters are not particularly believable. Remy Girard playing seasoned detective Bernard Dupin was seventy when the series was filmed and admits to being that age as part of a plot in Season Two. It's inconceivable that he'd be on field work as he's grossly overweight and can barely walk. And he's way past the age for retirement. Even worse, he subdues fit young thugs and hitmen without any trouble at all. In real life these guys would have pulverised him.

As for Eve Garance, the sketch artist, it just isn't credible that she gets witnesses to remember small details such as a mole or an earring, or even eye colour, in the contest of a rapid set of events or just a glimpse of the perp.

Maryse and Anthony have important supporting rôles as the head of the unit and CSI boy respectively. The writers seem to have woken up to the fact that they should have written in a techy IT person from the beginning so Elektra had a far more prominent place in the action in season two.

In the background, we have not particularly convincing human interest stories about the five main characters.

The crimes they deal with are over the top even for north America.

I admit I binge-watched but it's still pretty rubbishy. However, the actors and the tight direction kept it together for the main part.

We had three major cliffhangers at the end of season two. I assume a third one will come next year.

This is a very decent offering from French Canadian Television: well scripted, well directed, well acted, and contrary to the naysayers - it is believable! To address the comment that the senior police officer was too old and would be too unfit to carry out his duties: perhaps you missed the scene of his working out in their gym, monitoring his vitals and talking about how much longer the workouts needed to last?! In Canada, our officers have routine fitness training and assessments- so that critique is just ageist at best and wrong at worst!

As for Eve knowing how to retrieve "memories", might I suggest you educate yourselves: it's a well established and documented fact that the brain takes in all sorts of details, that may only be retrieved under certain circumstances and questions. Thus this "flaw" as some reviewers called it, is anything but! Just because it may challenge your current position or lack of knowledge, does not make something unbelievable!

To all those naysayers, I say NO! Educate yourself, and stop exhibiting the D-K effect in such startling force!

The show is believable, honest and very human - it portrays the good and the bad in each of us and address complex human behaviours as well as medical issues.

This is a show that is not to be missed!!

Well done Canada.

I checked this out on the PBS website, because it looked like a bit of a change from the copycat crime/mystery series populating PBS offerings these days.

I was right. From the very start, we learn that the four main characters are a fascinating little group of misfits, and the actors who portray them are wonderful too. Then add in the two or so other characters who are regulars on the show, and you have a full deck of entertainment.

So it's sort of immaterial what the investigations and crimes are, because the characters' personal lives are even more interesting. But the writers are good and have cooked up an imaginative slate of crime and mystery events, some of which regularly intersect with a mob boss and some which give the viewer a gasp of surprise and shock when they suddenly happen.

One other interesting thing is that the series takes place in Montreal, so the characters speak French (with easy-to-read subtitles), or rather a Franglais mix of weirdly accented Montreal French called 'Joual' mixed with English words, phrases, and sentences. It's pretty interesting in itself.