IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,0/10
2650
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Ein mysteriöser russischer Revolverheld hilft einem Marshal und einem Sheriff in einer ausweglosen Situation mit einer blutrünstigen Bande von Gesetzlosen, den Höllenhunden, die in ihre klei... Alles lesenEin mysteriöser russischer Revolverheld hilft einem Marshal und einem Sheriff in einer ausweglosen Situation mit einer blutrünstigen Bande von Gesetzlosen, den Höllenhunden, die in ihre kleine Stadt in Osttexas eingedrungen sind.Ein mysteriöser russischer Revolverheld hilft einem Marshal und einem Sheriff in einer ausweglosen Situation mit einer blutrünstigen Bande von Gesetzlosen, den Höllenhunden, die in ihre kleine Stadt in Osttexas eingedrungen sind.
Douglas Finical
- Elmer Irvin
- (as Douglas 'Fini' Finical)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
"Gunfight at Rio Bravo" is a forgettable western flick that fails to deliver on any level. The plot is stale and predictable. The characters are poorly developed and lack any depth or complexity, making it impossible to care about their fates.
The acting is wooden and uninspired, with lead actor giving a lackluster performance that feels like he's just going through the motions. The supporting cast is forgettable and interchangeable, with no one standing out as memorable or interesting.
The action sequences are poorly choreographed and lack any real tension or excitement. The gunfights are unremarkable and lack any sense of danger or risk, making them feel like a cheap imitation of better westerns.
The dialogue is clichéd and uninspired, filled with tired one-liners and predictable exchanges. The attempts at humor fall flat and feel forced, adding nothing to the overall experience.
The production values are low, with cheap sets and uninspired cinematography. The music is forgettable and fails to add anything to the film.
Overall, "Gunfight at Rio Bravo" is a dull and forgettable western that fails to deliver on any level. It's a movie that you'll forget as soon as it's over, and one that's not worth your time or money.
The acting is wooden and uninspired, with lead actor giving a lackluster performance that feels like he's just going through the motions. The supporting cast is forgettable and interchangeable, with no one standing out as memorable or interesting.
The action sequences are poorly choreographed and lack any real tension or excitement. The gunfights are unremarkable and lack any sense of danger or risk, making them feel like a cheap imitation of better westerns.
The dialogue is clichéd and uninspired, filled with tired one-liners and predictable exchanges. The attempts at humor fall flat and feel forced, adding nothing to the overall experience.
The production values are low, with cheap sets and uninspired cinematography. The music is forgettable and fails to add anything to the film.
Overall, "Gunfight at Rio Bravo" is a dull and forgettable western that fails to deliver on any level. It's a movie that you'll forget as soon as it's over, and one that's not worth your time or money.
If this is a comedy film, then it's great!
It is simply impossible to take such a game of actors seriously, shots and wounds look like effects were made in the application on the phone.
The main character is trying to be serious, but he is so unnatural that it only causes a facepalm.
There is one dialogue in the film with a hint of seriousness, but it would be better if it wasn't there.
In general, no need to waste time on this pathetic movie. Better read the reviews of this movie, it will be more useful and funny.
The only good thing about this movie is i wanted to rewatch the original RIO...
It is simply impossible to take such a game of actors seriously, shots and wounds look like effects were made in the application on the phone.
The main character is trying to be serious, but he is so unnatural that it only causes a facepalm.
There is one dialogue in the film with a hint of seriousness, but it would be better if it wasn't there.
In general, no need to waste time on this pathetic movie. Better read the reviews of this movie, it will be more useful and funny.
The only good thing about this movie is i wanted to rewatch the original RIO...
This is a truly terrible movie. The acting is extremely wooden - if they'd employed high school drama students they would have done a better job. The plot was nothing but western action movie cliches, strung together one after the other, without any development of tension. The only point of the movie seemed to be to see if Ivan Turchin can be the next Arnold Schwarzenegger. And the answer is - No, he can't. While Arnie was wooden at times, he always appeared to have a sense of humor bubbling away in the background. This movie takes itself totally seriously, and it's so bad it isn't even funny.
OMG... Are you kidding me???? This is the worst western I've ever seen in my life!!!!! I really don't understand where come all these 10-ratings from, are you people blind and deaf? It seems to me that all the reviews were written by professionals and sent by e-mail to all the friends of Nevsky, in purpose to copy-paste them and post on IMDB.
Pathetic and helpless acting and directing, bad costumes, lack of any interesting film editing, empty lines and dialogues - this movie feels like laundering the black money for Russian mafia (kidding, still want to live) :)) The only actor that did some good work on set was Matthias Hues (still looking good low budget movies actor), all the rest of cast, including Nevsky, was terrible. They didn't even have enough material to make this failure a bit longer...
I didn't see any "outstanding performances", any "really good bunch of talented actors", any "thoroughly depicted historical scenes", any "fantastic landscapes"... I didn't hear any of "Quentin Tarantino-style dialogues", any "fantastic music", any good work of sound department, any interesting intonation at all... Ilya Naishuler was mentioned in one of the reviews, but I'm sure he would cry upon this movie and amount of money Nevsky spilled on it. And I wonder what it would be if Tarantino was reading these reviews he was mentioned in.
I know what is the category called B-movie. And I love those movies! But this so called western isn't even close to this category!
It's just bad bad bad movie...
Pathetic and helpless acting and directing, bad costumes, lack of any interesting film editing, empty lines and dialogues - this movie feels like laundering the black money for Russian mafia (kidding, still want to live) :)) The only actor that did some good work on set was Matthias Hues (still looking good low budget movies actor), all the rest of cast, including Nevsky, was terrible. They didn't even have enough material to make this failure a bit longer...
I didn't see any "outstanding performances", any "really good bunch of talented actors", any "thoroughly depicted historical scenes", any "fantastic landscapes"... I didn't hear any of "Quentin Tarantino-style dialogues", any "fantastic music", any good work of sound department, any interesting intonation at all... Ilya Naishuler was mentioned in one of the reviews, but I'm sure he would cry upon this movie and amount of money Nevsky spilled on it. And I wonder what it would be if Tarantino was reading these reviews he was mentioned in.
I know what is the category called B-movie. And I love those movies! But this so called western isn't even close to this category!
It's just bad bad bad movie...
This is a comedy Western.....isn't it? Surely it's not meant to be serious. The dialogue and acting are indeed laughable but the writers forgot to add the intentional jokes and left in the unintentional ones. Every cliche, every plot point, every character, every attempt at conveying emotion.....all been done before and better.
The multi-lingual cast may be fantastic actors in their natural language. But if they have learnt this dialogue phonetically, as appears to have happened with this movie, it really doesn't help the action or the story.
You know the phrase "so bad it's good"? Doesn't apply- it's so bad, it's worse.
The multi-lingual cast may be fantastic actors in their natural language. But if they have learnt this dialogue phonetically, as appears to have happened with this movie, it really doesn't help the action or the story.
You know the phrase "so bad it's good"? Doesn't apply- it's so bad, it's worse.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesTaken from Rio Bravo (2024) is the film's planned sequel.
- PatzerNothing about Ivan's haircut or clothes says 1872.
- VerbindungenFeatured in Taken from Rio Bravo (2024)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Gunfight at Rio Bravo?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Rio Bravodagi otishma
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 20 Minuten
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen