Auf den Spuren des Unerklärlichen

I have only watched a couple of episodes of ''The Proof is Out There'' but already find it a compelling show to watch, the experts who comment on each presentation are credible and the host Tony Harris keeps it interesting and moving at a nice pace.

''The Proof is Out There'' is presented like a Court Jury studying the evidence available and then making a decision on their findings, I like this format as it is not the decision of a single person, and you hear the different views of the experts followed by a summing up by the host Tony Harris, leaving you to form your own opinion after considering all that has been said.

Good to hear that it is continuing to a second season, and I will be happy to spend some time catching up on more episodes, recommend for anyone with a curious and inquiring mind.

First off I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. Having said that am I the only person to notice that Mr. Tony Harris is always in & only ever wears gray pants & a black shirt? Lol. I can't be the only one to notice this! Lol. I love Ya Tony Harris but come on, change up the wardrobe now & then. Lol. Although, in my opinion, you do look mighty fine in those black shirts & gray pants. Thanks for listening to my feedback. I'd absolutely love to hear back from somebody cuz I really do LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this show. So thanks for bringing something new to watch that studies all of these issues & stories that maybe weren't taken seriously or didn't get reported for fear of not being believed. I appreciate your efforts to bring these issues to light when maybe nobody else took them seriously before. I do know absolutely that there are many more stories out there that haven't been reported for fear of not being believed as well as the fear of being ridiculed for what some may consider as unbelievable tall tales. I say thank u to everyone who chose to continue their fights to be recognized & heard. I hear you & I believe you regardless of if you have proof of your encounters or any way of proving yourself or not & I truly believe that there are more people out there who believe you more than not & the people who dont believe you usually they are the people in a position to know if these things are happening or not.

While watching tonight's episode, I saw the clip of the 3 rows of lights where the right most light on each row would go out, and be replaced by another light at the far left of the remaining lights. After watching the deliberations, the resulting verdict was that the lights are military flares, but I beg to differ with that theory, because if they were military flares, they would drop due to gravity, but none of these lights are dropping.......they are all moving in a straight line. And when a fighter jet releases flares, they don't normally release 1 flare at a time, they launch several! I have no idea what these lights are......but I highly doubt that they are military flares!

I find this show occasionally tries to debunk potential genuine UAPs.

To be honest, I love looking at the unusual things around us and trying to figure it out with logic, science and common sense. This show leaves me divided. I know that many things we see on the show can be misidentified, optical illusions or very rare, and some are complete hoaxes, but I also know that not all things can be easily explained even with science.

The scientific method requires the same results repeatedly, so when they speak to 1 expert for their 'opinion' without actually showing the scientific method, I am still left with doubts of credibility.

I love that they start by analyzing the video for inconsistencies since AI and video compositing can produce realistic results. This should be the first test in all cases. If it's a fake, stop there.

However, there's a 'Marine Biologist'... thats the only title. No credentials, no PHD or title or accolades to build credibility, who gives her opinion in debunking animal related incidents and that is 'fact'? I'm not saying she's not correct, it's still her words, opinions and observations. A generic title doesn't make an 'expert' and an opinion from this 'expert' isn't proof. I wish there were a little more science in some of the episodes and less opinion to quickly dismiss things that still could be something else.

I enjoy watching this show, but I feel like if they're doing a story on something that may be difficult to "prove" or distinguish between fact or fake the do not do enough investigation. If the subject is easy to come up with an explanation for, they do a good job discussing what the phenomenon actually is. But, with things that don't have an actual explanation right away they just write off as "unexplained phenomenon" or stop investigating and just SAY it can be explained. I wish they would continue investigations on harder to prove things until they get an actual explanation, or at least narrow it down to a few choices.