IMDb-BEWERTUNG
3,9/10
1519
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Während einer Hochzeit übernehmen Söldner die Kontrolle über ein abgelegenes Hotel und es liegt an dem Trauzeugen, dem Bräutigam und ihrem betrunkenen besten Freund, die Terroristen aufzuhal... Alles lesenWährend einer Hochzeit übernehmen Söldner die Kontrolle über ein abgelegenes Hotel und es liegt an dem Trauzeugen, dem Bräutigam und ihrem betrunkenen besten Freund, die Terroristen aufzuhalten.Während einer Hochzeit übernehmen Söldner die Kontrolle über ein abgelegenes Hotel und es liegt an dem Trauzeugen, dem Bräutigam und ihrem betrunkenen besten Freund, die Terroristen aufzuhalten.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Empfohlene Bewertungen
Right out of the gate this movie is horrendous and gets progressively worse. It really deserves a zero rating because the "value" here is literally zero. No fun, no laughs, no enjoyment, no suspense of any kind. The action here is a complete joke, basically High school film trash that would be embarrassing even on youtube. You can't even laugh at how bad it is because the movie is so boring. In terms of generic action movie this is as bad as it gets.
If you actually want a fun bad action movie then watch any of the recent Steven Seagal films. Those movies are hilariously bad and have basically the same plot, but the difference is you can actually laugh at those movies.
There is no situation on earth where I would recommended this movie expect maybe as a torture device.
If you actually want a fun bad action movie then watch any of the recent Steven Seagal films. Those movies are hilariously bad and have basically the same plot, but the difference is you can actually laugh at those movies.
There is no situation on earth where I would recommended this movie expect maybe as a torture device.
Well I wouldn't even rate this a B-movie its way way down the alphabet.
No real plot with really bad acting and some crazy pointless over acting by the female cast.. And when do special operators as they are alleged to be, kill someone and leave the weapons, bearing in mind they have no other weapons.. And who drops an assault rifle after they her a female scream, no you pick it up reload and go shoot someone..
If feels like a lot of the films that have come out recently with actors who have been off the scene for a while needing some money.
And When is Luke Wilson the type of actor that plays well anything bad ass.
No real plot with really bad acting and some crazy pointless over acting by the female cast.. And when do special operators as they are alleged to be, kill someone and leave the weapons, bearing in mind they have no other weapons.. And who drops an assault rifle after they her a female scream, no you pick it up reload and go shoot someone..
If feels like a lot of the films that have come out recently with actors who have been off the scene for a while needing some money.
And When is Luke Wilson the type of actor that plays well anything bad ass.
Watched this movie on the fact that it was rated 7.3 out of 10. Did anybody actually watch this film? Big fan of Luke Wilson and Brendan Fehr so figured I couldn't go wrong but boy, was I ever wrong. Right off the bat I could tell you the script was very poor with lots of long pauses between dialogue and the the action was basically just OK. Took forever just to get some context on what was going on. Even then, not sure if I understand it all. I realize not all films are going to be Oscar quality but boy, this was so NOT anything worthy. Guess Wilson and Fehr we're just bored and needed something to do!
I'm actually only half way through, but so bored I needed something to do.
The acting isn't terrible but the writing really is.
So many eye roll moments in this movie.
So many cliched moments. "We've never had to use the panic room". Really?
The premise was really good but such a wasted opportunity.
The actors were under-utilised and not shown to their best abilities.
No humour or light moments at all. Or maybe there was and I didn't get the jokes?
There was no reprieve from the serious feeling of the movie. Either traumatic action or serious, dark moments with too much conversation but nothing really said.
This was truly terrible.
The acting isn't terrible but the writing really is.
So many eye roll moments in this movie.
So many cliched moments. "We've never had to use the panic room". Really?
The premise was really good but such a wasted opportunity.
The actors were under-utilised and not shown to their best abilities.
No humour or light moments at all. Or maybe there was and I didn't get the jokes?
There was no reprieve from the serious feeling of the movie. Either traumatic action or serious, dark moments with too much conversation but nothing really said.
This was truly terrible.
Granted, I can't really say that I was exactly harboring a whole lot of expectations to this 2023 action thriller starring Luke Wilson, Dolph Lundgren and Brendan Fehr. But still, I opted to watch it, since I had the opportunity to do so, and because I hadn't already seen the movie.
The storyline in "The Best Man" was bland and generic, so very, very generic. I am rather impressed that three writers could collectively manage to put together something so bland. Writers C. Alec Rossel, Shane Dax Taylor and Daniel Zirilli didn't impress me with this movie, and it made for a very forgettable action thriller movie experience.
The acting performances in "The Best Man" were as you would assume they would be for a movie of this type, genre and caliber. You're not in for an evening of Shakespearian theater here, that's for sure. Not that I was expecting such, anyway.
For an action thriller then "The Best Man" came and went without leaving much of a lasting impression. Sure, I managed to sit through the entire 93 minutes that director Shane Dax Taylor presented, but I was only mildly entertained. This is hardly a movie that warrants more than just a single viewing.
My rating of "The Best Man" lands on a three out of ten stars.
The storyline in "The Best Man" was bland and generic, so very, very generic. I am rather impressed that three writers could collectively manage to put together something so bland. Writers C. Alec Rossel, Shane Dax Taylor and Daniel Zirilli didn't impress me with this movie, and it made for a very forgettable action thriller movie experience.
The acting performances in "The Best Man" were as you would assume they would be for a movie of this type, genre and caliber. You're not in for an evening of Shakespearian theater here, that's for sure. Not that I was expecting such, anyway.
For an action thriller then "The Best Man" came and went without leaving much of a lasting impression. Sure, I managed to sit through the entire 93 minutes that director Shane Dax Taylor presented, but I was only mildly entertained. This is hardly a movie that warrants more than just a single viewing.
My rating of "The Best Man" lands on a three out of ten stars.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerEvery character in a plate carrier has the magazines inserted upside down.
- VerbindungenReferenced in I Must Break This Podcast: The Best Man (2023)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is The Best Man?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 19.170 $
- Laufzeit1 Stunde 33 Minuten
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen