[go: up one dir, main page]

    Kalender veröffentlichenDie Top 250 FilmeDie beliebtesten FilmeFilme nach Genre durchsuchenBeste KinokasseSpielzeiten und TicketsNachrichten aus dem FilmFilm im Rampenlicht Indiens
    Was läuft im Fernsehen und was kann ich streamen?Die Top 250 TV-SerienBeliebteste TV-SerienSerien nach Genre durchsuchenNachrichten im Fernsehen
    Was gibt es zu sehenAktuelle TrailerIMDb OriginalsIMDb-AuswahlIMDb SpotlightLeitfaden für FamilienunterhaltungIMDb-Podcasts
    OscarsEmmysSan Diego Comic-ConSummer Watch GuideToronto Int'l Film FestivalSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAlle Ereignisse
    Heute geborenDie beliebtesten PromisPromi-News
    HilfecenterBereich für BeitragendeUmfragen
Für Branchenprofis
  • Sprache
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Anmelden
  • Vollständig unterstützt
  • English (United States)
    Teilweise unterstützt
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
App verwenden
  • Besetzung und Crew-Mitglieder
  • Benutzerrezensionen
  • Wissenswertes
  • FAQ
IMDbPro

The Prometheus Project

  • 2010
  • 18
  • 1 Std. 27 Min.
IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,8/10
1093
IHRE BEWERTUNG
The Prometheus Project (2010)
EntsetzenScience-Fiction

Wissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt ... Alles lesenWissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt wird. Dafür experimentieren sie an Menschen.Wissenschaftlerin Barnes ist neu im Team des geheimnisvollen Dr. Walton. Die Wissenschaftler forschen an einem universell einsetzbaren Wundheilungsserum, welches aus Stammzellen hergestellt wird. Dafür experimentieren sie an Menschen.

  • Regie
    • Sean Tretta
  • Drehbuch
    • Sean Tretta
    • Mary Shelley
  • Hauptbesetzung
    • Tiffany Shepis
    • Louis Mandylor
    • Scott Anthony Leet
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • IMDb-BEWERTUNG
    4,8/10
    1093
    IHRE BEWERTUNG
    • Regie
      • Sean Tretta
    • Drehbuch
      • Sean Tretta
      • Mary Shelley
    • Hauptbesetzung
      • Tiffany Shepis
      • Louis Mandylor
      • Scott Anthony Leet
    • 11Benutzerrezensionen
    • 21Kritische Rezensionen
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
  • Siehe Produktionsinformationen bei IMDbPro
    • Auszeichnungen
      • 2 wins total

    Fotos24

    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    Poster ansehen
    + 18
    Poster ansehen

    Topbesetzung34

    Ändern
    Tiffany Shepis
    Tiffany Shepis
    • Elizabeth
    Louis Mandylor
    Louis Mandylor
    • Marcus
    Scott Anthony Leet
    Scott Anthony Leet
    • David Doyle
    Patti Tindall
    • Victoria
    Jonathan Northover
    • William
    Sebastian Kunnappilly
    • Neeraj
    Noah Todd
    • Ira
    Joe Ricci
    Joe Ricci
    • Cyrus
    Zena Otsuka
    • Kima
    David C. Hayes
    David C. Hayes
    • Paul Fitcher
    Kristina Wayborn
    Kristina Wayborn
    • Elizabeth's Mother
    Ed Lauter
    Ed Lauter
    • Dr. Walton
    Shane Dean
    • Special Agent Wollstoncraft
    Esther Ellsworth
    • Special Agent Godwin
    Lillie Richardson
    • Ott
    Kevin Tye
    • Ivan
    R.K. Anderson
    R.K. Anderson
    • Marquez
    • (as Richard Anderson)
    Maya Stojan
    Maya Stojan
    • Dr. Walton's Nurse
    • Regie
      • Sean Tretta
    • Drehbuch
      • Sean Tretta
      • Mary Shelley
    • Komplette Besetzung und alle Crew-Mitglieder
    • Produktion, Einspielergebnisse & mehr bei IMDbPro

    Benutzerrezensionen11

    4,81K
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    9
    10

    Empfohlene Bewertungen

    4jacobjohntaylor1

    A classic horror story ruined.

    This a Frankenstein remake. Frankenstein is on of the greatest horror stories ever and they ruined it. This movie is badly acted. Badly written. It has an awful ending. In this one the monster can turn water into fruit punch. I don't mind that Dr Frankenstein is woman. The part about the monster turning water into fruit punch I could of do mind. This movie is not scary at all. I can think of some very scary Frankenstein movie. Frankenstein (1931) is very scary. The cures of Frankenstein is very scary. Frankenstein unbound is also very scary. I Frankenstein is also very scary. But not this one don't see it. Don't wast your money. And don't wast you time.
    7krachtm

    Nothing new, but entertaining, nonetheless.

    This movie is a bit scientifically ignorant, which might offend some people who are hoping for a science fiction story, and the philosophical / ethical questions are rather simplistic, but it's still enjoyable for what it is (a mad scientist movie, in the Frankenstein tradition). Basically, a group of ethically challenged researchers decide that they're going to muck around with illegal stem cell research. When things go wrong and bodies start to pile up, a unique opportunity presents itself, Herbert West-style: re-animating the cadavers of troublemakers who got in the way. Unfortunately, I thought the movie started to lose credibility here, as it started to take on more and more fantastical elements. I guess that if you're willing to buy into re-animating the dead, it shouldn't be such a leap to accept the whole supernatural twist that this movie takes near the middle (and, especially, the end), but what really annoyed me was that they trotted out that dumb "we only use 10% of our brain" myth. Ugh. I hate that. Much of the later film seems to hinge of this, and, once again, the man who can use all 100% of his brain turns out to be capable of psychic powers. This is complete nonsense, of course, but is it any more nonsensical than re-animating the dead, using stem cells? Eventually, I just gave up on this movie saying anything intelligent and treated it as a silly supernatural film, no more scientific than a haunted house or demonic possession story. After that point, I think I liked it better, because there really isn't anything deep here at all. If you're actually looking for an examination on medical ethics, a science fiction thriller, or extreme gore (there's a bit of gore, but it's not that bad), I'd suggest you skip The Frankenstein Syndrome. TFS is actually a pretty enjoyable movie, once you get past the technobabble and laughable "science", but it's certainly nothing that's going to make you ponder deep thoughts or strike up conversations with your friends.

    The acting and special effects were quite good, though the writing and directing were a bit uneven, unfortunately. Some of the things that the director had the actors yelling at each other were a bit unintentionally funny, but the actors did make it work. So, I figure that's good for a 7/10. I'd be curious to see what the director does next, but I'm not quite a fan yet.
    6TdSmth5

    An alright B movie that doesn't quite fulfill the potential of the script

    In the intro we see some facility on lockdown, some girl runs, there's a decapitated body. The girls writes a note when someone grabs her.

    FBI agents interview a woman in a wheelchair wearing a mask. She tells us what happened. Now we're taken months back. A molecular biologist (played by Tiffany Shepis!?) gets a job at this facility, owned by some eccentric rich guy. There are armed guards everywhere. Marcus runs the facility and introduces Tiff to the rest of the team: a surgeon, a data information guy, some Indian researcher, and some lady scientist who immediately dislikes Tiff. This group is given free reign to work on a stem cell-based serum to regenerate cells/organs, etc.

    They make some progress. Tiff has some outlandish idea. They go ahead and inject Tiff's serum into some piece of rubber on a dish that we're told is supposed to be a heart. Nothing happens. Later they try the upgraded version of the serum. Suddenly the heart starts beating.

    There's something else going on at the facility. In a room in a basement they keep girls and the lady researcher extracts embryos from them. One of the girls had a relationship with one the guards. The procedure of extracting her embryo depresses her and she commits suicide. That gives the researchers the idea to try and revive the girl with the serum. And it works. Except that she starts spewing black bile and gets aggressive. So she has to be eliminated.

    Suddenly the guard who had a relationship with the girl shows up with a lawyer and demands money to stay silent about what goes on. Marcus shoots them both instead. Again the researchers give smaller amounts of serum to the dead guard, even though he has a huge hole in his head. But sure enough, the serum works. The hole closes up, the guard regains life and consciousness. The lady researcher treats him as her son and teaches him things. The guy, named David--what else, not only learns but does so very quickly. He starts devouring books and gains the skills of clairvoyance, telekinesis, and the ability to turn water into fruit punch. But eventually he flips out and we catch up with the scenes from the intro as he kills everyone he can.

    The Prometheus Project is a promising movie. It has a very good idea and an excellent script. Casting is iffy. Shepis in the lead role as a scientist? I don't know. Patti Tindall as the nasty researcher? Not crazy about that one. Some unknown as the David character? Not convincing. It's until we get to tertiary characters like Marcus that we get someone with acting chops in Louis Mandylor. The looks of this movie makes you think you're watching something above a B-movie but audio is problematic and it reminds you, if the casting didn't, that you are watching a B-movie after all. So budget is lacking to take this movie to a level the story deserves. It's also one of those horror movies that makes you wait more than an hour until we get to the horror and gore. Still, it gets you involved and you do care about the outcome.
    6kannibalcorpsegrinder

    Predictable, bland telling of the story

    After joining an illegal group of doctors to find a way to improve stem cell research, a woman finds the latest experiments bring the dead back to life and the one test subject chosen gets stronger and more violent over time, threatening the quality of their work.

    This was an extremely disappointing effort, mostly due to the fact that the film's decided route makes for an incredibly unsatisfactory effort. Making the investigation of the team into their research and how they deal with each other isn't interesting or enjoyable, making for the first half of the film to have hardly anything worthwhile. Once it switches over into the regeneration angle, it's still quite a bit of time before the creature goes berserk as they spend a great deal of time treating and studying the subject, and it's really only the last ten minutes or so where it turns into a bloodbath when he goes crazy in the facility. That there's more damage done by a member of the team than the titular creature is another problematic point, and most of the scientific mumbo-jumbo is pretty headache-inducing if not inclined to follow along, but as mentioned, the last ten minutes are pretty good with the creature going through the facility killing them off one-by-one, but it's really too late to be of much use and leaving this one woefully underwhelming.

    Rated R: Graphic Violence and Graphic Language.
    1synaptec

    I want 90 minutes of my life back as I'd rather pliers-pull my fingernails

    This film is absolute, complete and utter garbage.

    I was feeling particularly suicidal today so suffered through it with 3 extended vodka shot breaks.

    1st - tripods exist for a reason.

    2nd - the sOuNd recording and mixing is all over the place. Dreadful.

    3rd - the story .. um .. what story? Oh and is there a music soundtrack? Not that I could hear between the aUdIo levels all over the place. How can you have mood without music? Perhaps the last 3 minutes of the film should have been the start.

    Avoid at all costs! A disgrace to the genre.

    Mehr wie diese

    The Manson Family
    5,5
    The Manson Family
    All the Creatures Were Stirring
    4,9
    All the Creatures Were Stirring
    Night Wolf
    4,3
    Night Wolf
    Visher
    4,3
    Visher
    Making Monsters
    5,5
    Making Monsters
    Depraved
    5,5
    Depraved
    Prometey
    5,5
    Prometey
    A Beginner's Guide to Snuff
    5,0
    A Beginner's Guide to Snuff
    Prometheus 2
    Night of the Demons
    4,7
    Night of the Demons
    The Retaliators - Auge um Auge
    5,3
    The Retaliators - Auge um Auge
    Freeway Killer
    5,4
    Freeway Killer

    Handlung

    Ändern

    Wusstest du schon

    Ändern
    • Wissenswertes
      The character names "Agent Wollstonecraft" and "Agent Godwin" are direct references to the original author of the novel "Frankenstein" - Mary Wollstonecraft Godwin Shelley.

    Top-Auswahl

    Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
    Anmelden

    FAQ16

    • How long is The Prometheus Project?Powered by Alexa

    Details

    Ändern
    • Erscheinungsdatum
      • Oktober 2010 (Vereinigte Staaten)
    • Herkunftsland
      • Vereinigte Staaten
    • Sprache
      • Englisch
    • Auch bekannt als
      • Frankenstein - Experiment in Terror
    • Drehorte
      • Phoenix, Arizona, USA
    • Produktionsfirmen
      • NWR Productions
      • Ominous Productions
    • Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen

    Technische Daten

    Ändern
    • Laufzeit
      1 Stunde 27 Minuten
    • Farbe
      • Color
    • Sound-Mix
      • Dolby Digital
    • Seitenverhältnis
      • 1.85 : 1

    Zu dieser Seite beitragen

    Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen
    • Erfahre mehr über das Beitragen
    Seite bearbeiten

    Mehr entdecken

    Zuletzt angesehen

    Bitte aktiviere Browser-Cookies, um diese Funktion nutzen zu können. Weitere Informationen
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Melde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr InhalteMelde dich an für Zugriff auf mehr Inhalte
    Folge IMDb in den sozialen Netzwerken
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    Für Android und iOS
    Hol dir die IMDb-App
    • Hilfe
    • Inhaltsverzeichnis
    • IMDbPro
    • Box Office Mojo
    • IMDb-Daten lizenzieren
    • Pressezimmer
    • Werbung
    • Jobs
    • Allgemeine Geschäftsbedingungen
    • Datenschutzrichtlinie
    • Your Ads Privacy Choices
    IMDb, ein Amazon-Unternehmen

    © 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.