Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuA group of college kids must decide what price they will pay to gain their freedom after being kidnapped by a ruthless White Slave trader.A group of college kids must decide what price they will pay to gain their freedom after being kidnapped by a ruthless White Slave trader.A group of college kids must decide what price they will pay to gain their freedom after being kidnapped by a ruthless White Slave trader.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Monica Summerfield
- Liz
- (as Monica Sommerfield)
Jon W. Sparks
- Feed Store Clerk
- (as Jon Sparks)
Carter Davis
- Radio Voice
- (Synchronisation)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
A group of college kids must decide what price they will pay to gain their freedom after being kidnapped by a ruthless White Slave trader.
This film is described on the DVD case as "gutsy", but that's just about the last word I would use to describe it. The film quality is low, seemingly on purpose to give it a gritty look, and this only adds to the frustration of trying to watch it. Aside from the film quality itself, the movie is just plain bad.
If you like watching people being tortured, there are a few scenes you may enjoy. I, for one, have grown bored with it. I wasn't a big fan in the first place, and if you want to cover up a weak plot with torture, that's just a poor idea and you shouldn't have made the film in the first place. "Saw" and "Hostel" said it all.
There's a plot twist here or there that is kind of interesting, but hardly worth getting excited about. Personally, I think it would be in your best interest to just keep walking and forget this film was ever made. I know I will soon forget.
This film is described on the DVD case as "gutsy", but that's just about the last word I would use to describe it. The film quality is low, seemingly on purpose to give it a gritty look, and this only adds to the frustration of trying to watch it. Aside from the film quality itself, the movie is just plain bad.
If you like watching people being tortured, there are a few scenes you may enjoy. I, for one, have grown bored with it. I wasn't a big fan in the first place, and if you want to cover up a weak plot with torture, that's just a poor idea and you shouldn't have made the film in the first place. "Saw" and "Hostel" said it all.
There's a plot twist here or there that is kind of interesting, but hardly worth getting excited about. Personally, I think it would be in your best interest to just keep walking and forget this film was ever made. I know I will soon forget.
This is a low budget horror if you aren't into this then this isn't for you. For most fans of horror it's the low budget movies that are the best because they're usually pretty fun and creative. We know this isn't going to be a Hollywood blockbuster film but that's why we enjoy it. The same reason you see people watch highschool football games. They're not nfl or even college games but they're fun and full of spirit. That's what three cheap horror flicks are like.
The worst past of this movie was the beginning for me as it was hard to tell what was going on and why. Soon as we get to the barn where everything takes places the movie gets 1,000 better. I actually almost turned this one off at first because it seemed like it was just going to be a time waster but it picked up.
The barn is where we get to the root of horror in this movie about human trafficking. Most of the gory stuff takes place here and it's actually pretty well done.
What I found most annoying though is that all the female characters look a like. They all have black hair and dark circles around their eyes and similar facial features. I really couldn't tell who was who or if the same actor was playing multiple parts there how bad it was.
The special effects is good in areas where it needs to be but the makeup wow. It's really bad. Everyone has dark raccoon circles around their eyes and it makes them all look like hobos or something. It's really weird.
The good parts are the story is decent. I liked the torture segments they were better than some other films where it becomes cheesy. In this film they sort of cut away and then come back to it which is good if you don't have the fx budget to fully film the actually torture scene.
Acting I mean it's horror acting. It's not required to be amazing. It's the screams and terror that sell the movie and this movie had some great screamers and terror faces. Without that a horror movie just doesn't sell well to the audience.
This movie also has a twist ending I guess you either like or won't. I didn't for some reason. Didn't seem like it was really needed for a movie like this.
Overall the movie kept my interest. It had some good scenes but the early part of the movie was just unwatchable. It seems like the movie would be great with more characters and time to establish who they were. The movie also strangely seems to show characters and then forget them.
I swear there was a red headed woman locked up and a guy they punished by throwing in a punishment room that the movie forgot to never address or show again.
Either way this was an ok b stock movie.
The worst past of this movie was the beginning for me as it was hard to tell what was going on and why. Soon as we get to the barn where everything takes places the movie gets 1,000 better. I actually almost turned this one off at first because it seemed like it was just going to be a time waster but it picked up.
The barn is where we get to the root of horror in this movie about human trafficking. Most of the gory stuff takes place here and it's actually pretty well done.
What I found most annoying though is that all the female characters look a like. They all have black hair and dark circles around their eyes and similar facial features. I really couldn't tell who was who or if the same actor was playing multiple parts there how bad it was.
The special effects is good in areas where it needs to be but the makeup wow. It's really bad. Everyone has dark raccoon circles around their eyes and it makes them all look like hobos or something. It's really weird.
The good parts are the story is decent. I liked the torture segments they were better than some other films where it becomes cheesy. In this film they sort of cut away and then come back to it which is good if you don't have the fx budget to fully film the actually torture scene.
Acting I mean it's horror acting. It's not required to be amazing. It's the screams and terror that sell the movie and this movie had some great screamers and terror faces. Without that a horror movie just doesn't sell well to the audience.
This movie also has a twist ending I guess you either like or won't. I didn't for some reason. Didn't seem like it was really needed for a movie like this.
Overall the movie kept my interest. It had some good scenes but the early part of the movie was just unwatchable. It seems like the movie would be great with more characters and time to establish who they were. The movie also strangely seems to show characters and then forget them.
I swear there was a red headed woman locked up and a guy they punished by throwing in a punishment room that the movie forgot to never address or show again.
Either way this was an ok b stock movie.
This was by far one of the worst attempts at psychological horror i have seen that actually tried to be serious. The sound and dialog was extremely sub-par, even for a lower budget film. No character development leave you not caring for any of the major characters, and the numerous plot holes leaves you guessing half the movie. Avoid at all costs. As for anyone that says to see it for the fun factor or anything like that, I would definitely look elsewhere, as the visual effects and gore are horrible and sometimes non-existent. The obvious seems to escape the characters at many times and make them seem extremely one dimensional and forced.
A group of lively college kids are on break, dancing and romancing and generally fooling around when they are hunted down by burly, menacing Edgar (Patrick Cox) who shoots them full of tranquilizers. The young people awake chained in horse stalls. These would-be yuppies realize that they are now the property of human trafficker Wayne (John Still). With his white hair and beard and roly poly big belly, Wayne appears a kind of perversely demonic Santa Claus. More concretely, he comes across as a psychopathic business executive when he announces to the young people in the stalls, "You are my property!" The ruthless capitalist aspect is underlined when he is depicted at his desk, filling out forms and keeping track of funds like any efficient executive. But he is as ruthless as they come as poor Josh (Scott Fletcher) soon discovers. Letting out a series of loud cries at being chained, he faces Wayne's wrath, which is, of course, expressed in torture and mutilation.
The primary protagonists of the film are brother and sister Nick (Christian Walker) and Erin (Jeanette Comans). Nick is the youth with, as Wayne notes, "spirit," who desperately seeks a way out of enslavement, Erin is the sister of whom he is protective and who, in her turn, is protective of her friend Vicky (Scarlet Williams), the first to be toyed with by Edgar, and the first to be sold. Almost as striking as a torture or mutilation scene is the scene in which this pretty twenty-something female is locked inside a wooden box with the words "Live Animal" on it. We are told she is to be shipped overseas where she will be imprisoned in a brothel.
Perhaps the most interesting character is Kathy (Stacy Still) who is not one of the college kids but whom they are surprised find already there in one of the stalls. She appears to have been kidnapped some prior but has not been sold and instead gone insane from the sheer boredom of her surroundings. She spends her days reciting children's nursery rhymes, repeating phrases she hears from other people, and talking ambiguously about a husband who might be about to rescue her.
Directed by Jeremy Benson, with a screenplay he co-wrote with Mark Williams, "Live Animals" is a fast-paced, interestingly nasty piece of work. I enjoyed watching as these unfortunate young people sought so desperately to find a way out of their horrifying situation and fight against their heartless captors. Although others have faulted the acting, I found it satisfactory, particularly by John Still, Stacy Still, and and Christian Walker - the three performers who really count. A lot of blood is splattered around and the cinematography gives the whole thing an appropriately gritty and sleazy look to it. There is a startling twist toward the end. Does it make sense? Maybe. Maybe not. But it hardly matters because it ramps up the horror and fits perfectly in a film that wallows in the grisly.
The primary protagonists of the film are brother and sister Nick (Christian Walker) and Erin (Jeanette Comans). Nick is the youth with, as Wayne notes, "spirit," who desperately seeks a way out of enslavement, Erin is the sister of whom he is protective and who, in her turn, is protective of her friend Vicky (Scarlet Williams), the first to be toyed with by Edgar, and the first to be sold. Almost as striking as a torture or mutilation scene is the scene in which this pretty twenty-something female is locked inside a wooden box with the words "Live Animal" on it. We are told she is to be shipped overseas where she will be imprisoned in a brothel.
Perhaps the most interesting character is Kathy (Stacy Still) who is not one of the college kids but whom they are surprised find already there in one of the stalls. She appears to have been kidnapped some prior but has not been sold and instead gone insane from the sheer boredom of her surroundings. She spends her days reciting children's nursery rhymes, repeating phrases she hears from other people, and talking ambiguously about a husband who might be about to rescue her.
Directed by Jeremy Benson, with a screenplay he co-wrote with Mark Williams, "Live Animals" is a fast-paced, interestingly nasty piece of work. I enjoyed watching as these unfortunate young people sought so desperately to find a way out of their horrifying situation and fight against their heartless captors. Although others have faulted the acting, I found it satisfactory, particularly by John Still, Stacy Still, and and Christian Walker - the three performers who really count. A lot of blood is splattered around and the cinematography gives the whole thing an appropriately gritty and sleazy look to it. There is a startling twist toward the end. Does it make sense? Maybe. Maybe not. But it hardly matters because it ramps up the horror and fits perfectly in a film that wallows in the grisly.
Live Animals is in the same category as Saw and Hostel; independent, torture films, which portray the lowest level of humanity; this feature is not for children or those easily offended. College students make the mistake of having a little party in the woods. They are abducted by a group of slave traders and held captive, chained, and in cages, as the title implies.
The holding place almost looks like a prison, with adjacent cells holding the human cattle, and they are tortured mercilessly by their overseers. I guess the point here is our nasty treatment of animals for our food supply. The acting is nothing special, and the story watchable for the short, eighty six minute running time. If you need to kill an hour and a half on a rainy afternoon, Live Animals is an entertaining diversion.
The holding place almost looks like a prison, with adjacent cells holding the human cattle, and they are tortured mercilessly by their overseers. I guess the point here is our nasty treatment of animals for our food supply. The acting is nothing special, and the story watchable for the short, eighty six minute running time. If you need to kill an hour and a half on a rainy afternoon, Live Animals is an entertaining diversion.
Wusstest du schon
- PatzerWhen they hear the car coming, Nick's fingers are bloody from trying to pick out the bolts from the wall. When we see him again his fingers are nice and clean.
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Live Animals?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box Office
- Budget
- 50.000 $ (geschätzt)
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 24 Min.(84 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.35 : 1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen