The New York Times Presents

All the episodes are Utter trash by NY Times that was founded 1851 To keep & support slavery also the democratic (now insog) party. New York Times incited riots against the Civil War slso Never got over losing Civil War.

For the most part I enjoyed this series and the stories that were shown. However, the episode on Dillon Fike was low-content.

Look, I get it that ppl don´t want to be confronted with bad news, situations or truth, but ...

If there´s a reality show with Kim Kardashian, ppl love it, but when it´s about what is really happening in the world of "ordinary ppl" than we tend to switch off and judge it with a 1.

Episode1 is about healthcare workers and immediately ppl start to judge it very very harshly because it´s not what they want to hear or see. This has happened in NY and is now happening in more states all across the US.

You can close your eyes or look the other way, but at this rate it will come to a lot of us.

Basically, if you´re hoping for an uplifting story or something with a happy ending, don´t watch nor judge it. If you want to know what actually happened, hear it from the ppl that were there "hands on" it´s worth the time.

It won´t make you happy, but it´ll give you the info that others are desperately trying to avoid, alter or deny.

August 8, let´s see where we´re at in 3 weeks from now ...

For my money this is the best show of its type on TV hands down. I can't wait for the next airing and always wish this was an hour long. Excellent, excellent, excellent.

Slap full of propaganda. Im watching in 2023 the first episode is health care workers presenting covid as if it were an episode of the Walking Dead. They said when the restrictions were lifted covid cases would skyrocket and yada yada yada. Well we all know how that turned out. However when you get to the episode abiut Brianna Taylor that one is actually interesting. And objective. The show as a whole doesn't seem to have a theme. You've got episodes about pop singers and rappers along with one about fires in Australia and crimes and criminals. So what is the new york times actually presenting?