Murder.com

In Miami, the successful lawyer Stacy (Alexandra Paul) and her colleague and friend Lauren (Robyn Lively) are enjoying a party promoted by the company where they work when Stacy receives a call from her hometown Venice telling that her sister Kate (Ellyn Daniels) was murdered. Stacy heads to Venice and meets her former high school mate Bobby (David Chokachi) in charge of the investigation of the case but without any lead. Stacy meets Kate's employer Roger (David Moretti) trying to get some information about her sister since they were distant and without contact for a long time. While in Kate's house, she finds an external HD hidden in her Teddy Bear and she discovers that Kate was a user of a site that promoted encounters for kinky sex; together she finds the address book of her sister with a couple of names. Stacy joins the site and schedules to meet with the guys listed in the address book sure that one of them might be the killer of her sister.

I watched "Murder.com" because I like the elegant actress Alexandra Paul, but unfortunately the plot of this movie is implausible, predictable and has a corny conclusion. Why a successful lawyer would risk her position exposing in a perverted site to investigate the death of her practically unknown sister? The police was investigating and she could have given the HD to Bobby. The conclusion is also awful since the independent profile of Stacy, who left Venice due to the lack of opportunities in a small town, does not fit with a housewife. Last but not the least; David Moretti is miscast since he is shorter than Alexandra Paul and in the climax of the story, she is visibly in a hole to look shorter than Roger. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): Not Available

Hello!

November 17th 2023rd

Genre: Mystery

Duration: Around an hour

What was this movie about?:

An umm... sister tries to solve the case about her murder sister so SHE goes undercover.

A story and the production overview:

This movie was great background noise.

It was not all that interesting when it could have.

Each client was a creep or violent.

The execution of the movie was soft. It could have been better and add more suspense but failed to do so.

When the movie was all over, I didn't care.

Highlight:

None

Moral:

Protect yourself.

Rating:

Hash

Final words:

Nothing else to say about this background noise.

When Roger said he was 3 years behind Stacy in high school, I literally LOLd. Why do these movie types try to make much older women seem much younger than their age. They do this or they're a parent to a small child when they clearly look like the grandma instead. Don't get me wrong...the women look great, but not in their 20s/30s.

With 22 votes, 19 of them giving a wonderful 10/10 and the other three trying to redress the balance with 1/10, there is some vote-rigging going on here. This is NOT a 10/10 movie... (not even by the wildest stretch of the imagination) maybe the system needs to be fixed, because posting an overall rating based on such obvious manipulation of a relatively low sampling will make people waste their time (and money)... and only serve to devalue IMDb's reputation.

The movie itself is a pot-boiler. It's OK if you've got time on your hands. It's not going to win any awards or go any way to enhance the reputations of the cast and crew... but it's OK if you've got nothing better planned (like cleaning the grout in the shower). To put the voting in perspective, Netflix voters gave it a 3.3/5 for about the same number of voters... the only critic review listed gave it 1/5 ...

Allowing the system to be gamed devalues the whole rating system. Automatically flagging patterns like this is such an easy thing to do, and is absolutely not a difficult code implementation... any code monkey worth his salt will knock it out in ten minutes.

Clean house please. Bish

Is it just me or was Alexandra Paul horrible in this? Her "angry" scenes with the cop were cringe-worthy, and her "acting" was all over the place. Robyn Lively would have been much better in this role.