Ein hervorragender Schönheitschirurg, der immer wieder von den tragischen Ereignissen seiner Vergangenheit heimgesucht wird, entwickelt einen synthetischen Hauttyp, der jeder Art von Beschäd... Alles lesenEin hervorragender Schönheitschirurg, der immer wieder von den tragischen Ereignissen seiner Vergangenheit heimgesucht wird, entwickelt einen synthetischen Hauttyp, der jeder Art von Beschädigung standhält. Sein Versuchsobjekt: eine geheimnisvolle und etwas sprunghafte Frau, die ... Alles lesenEin hervorragender Schönheitschirurg, der immer wieder von den tragischen Ereignissen seiner Vergangenheit heimgesucht wird, entwickelt einen synthetischen Hauttyp, der jeder Art von Beschädigung standhält. Sein Versuchsobjekt: eine geheimnisvolle und etwas sprunghafte Frau, die der Schlüssel zu seinen Zwangsvorstellungen ist.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- 1 BAFTA Award gewonnen
- 28 Gewinne & 69 Nominierungen insgesamt
Empfohlene Bewertungen
With that in mind, I'll keep this review short and will try not to give anything away. Antonio Banderas plays a rather unhinged scientist who is keeping a beautiful young woman prisoner in his home while using her as a human guinea pig for a new type of synthetic human skin. That's about as much information as you need. As the story unfolds, petal by petal in that flower-like way we've become accustomed to seeing from Almodovar, each scene adds wonder and flavour to an already robust set-up. Moving at a break-neck pace, not a frame is without beauty and not a second is wasted without pushing the story along. This screenplay is extremely polished and beautifully nuanced.
As usual, cinematographer Jose Luis Alcaine delivers beautifully vibrant visuals, but unlike other Almodovar films, this palette is decidedly less colourful, sticking mainly to Cronenbergian metallic colours fused with fleshy tones but with the odd gash of vibrant colour. It is as beautiful to behold as any other Almodovar film, but perhaps less garish.
In a film that relies on ambiguity in so many ways the cast here must be commended. Delicate balances are achieved by all concerned and it's wonderful to see Antonio Banderas settling into the rather unsettling role of Dr. Robert Ledgard. He exudes the same charisma and sexual bravura that made him famous but without the least whiff of sex symbol status coming through in the performance. He is creepy, strangely alluring and underplays the "mad scientist" bit admirably. Elena Anayas also impresses in a very challenging performance both physically and emotionally, both of which are perfectly effective as her story unfolds. A brilliant character who may not have been so impressive in the hands of a less capable actress. The camera intimately caresses her face and body throughout and she steadfastly rises to the challenge of being as beautiful a muse as a director could ask for.
It is unlikely that Almodovar will win over any new fans with The Skin I Live In but he will surely satisfy his already massive fanbase. A dark, thoughtful, frightening piece but never shying away from the heights of melodrama that Almodovar is known for, this sits beautifully on the line between Cronenberg at his best and a crazy soap opera.
Unique, Gothic and delightfully melodramatic! I love it!
http://charlenefilmblog.blogspot.com/2011/08/skin-i-live-in.html
A Spanish mystery about a plastic surgeon who practiced skin transplant.
First of all, there were quite a lot of explicit contents here. Not sure if it's necessary.
The most fascinating part was middle part of the movie with a long flashback that showed what happened to the surgeon and how he dealt with the aftermath. And oh boy that was disturbing and gross.
Through this messed-up story was the theme of retribution and obsession. It showed a disturbing way that a person could bring about retribution.
Overall, a disturbing story with great acting. 7.5/10.
I will finally hit subjectivity and say that less and less often the film is able to cause anything other than: disgust, laughter or such a sad moment of crying, let's call it pity. I don't know.
But this movie! Everything is different here. Everything somehow shrank inside after the plot twist at the end and it was a great feeling.
It seems like the main villain of the film causes empathy, and the main character, he is the person who lost the most, appears to the viewer, on the contrary, not in the best possible way.
And with such ambivalent feelings, you sit and watch the climax. An indescribable feeling. Be sure to try it!
Antonio Banderas is so terrific as the leading man, he hasn't looked this great in screen in a long time, I think he seems more at home in his native language, and Elena Anaya is absolutely radiant on the big screen, her face just lights up the screen and she is absolutely exceptional in a very strange role. The story is really a bizarre one, it's seems like a less perverted De Sade and a more understandable David Lynch, it always takes you by surprise and it is highly original and also somewhat daring I think, and thank god a director like Almodovar decided to film it and not some silly director.
The cinematography and music is beautiful, the colours and textures in the film are picked up beautifully by the camera and the music is a great companion to each scene, it's so close to perfection in the production design department that i would go so far to say as I haven't seen a better looking film this year.
This movie is in my opinion the least accessible of all of Almodovar's films but I hope it doesn't put people off, as his touch and style is clear and present here. It's very different, strange, perverted, horrific, beautiful and always entertaining.
Enjoy :)
The order in which the events of the story are told is a cunning device that allows the director to make us reflect on how superficially - indeed, skin-deep - we perceive reality and how quick we are to judge first impressions and jump to conclusions. What we first perceive one way, those initial scenes that slightly baffle us but which we nevertheless do not hesitate to judge in a specific way, take on a completely new meaning when the story pauses to take us back into the past in order to tell us about an important series of events that happened at the time which bear a direct relation to present events. The new light that is shed on the present changes completely our perception of the story as we had first witnessed it, which is a humbling experience. We are then taken back again to the present and continue watching the rest of the film, but with this completely new understanding of the real underlying motivations for the characters' actions. It is at this point that through a slight thriller-style twist in the plot the story takes on a Shakespearean dimension as it delivers its powerful humanist lesson that vengeance begets vengeance.
Food for thought, in fact enough food to last you days and feed other people, as you are left on the one hand wondering at the concept of skin: what we actually desire when we desire someone, whether all desire is skin-deep, whether the skin does not allow us to see the person behind. And on the other hand you are left with the reflection on how the road of vengeance leads only to self-destruction. When a film leaves you pondering so deeply, I can only conclude it is a great film.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesAfter a few days of shooting, Pedro Almodóvar had a conversation with Antonio Banderas in which he told Banderas that he needed to drop all of his tics as an actor, because the director wanted a really restrained character and the actor was playing him in a more typical psycho way.
- PatzerWhen Doctor Robert Ledgard and his colleagues are preparing themselves for surgery, they fasten each other's surgical gown from the back, contaminating their sterile gloves.
- Zitate
Profesora de Yoga en TV: There's a place where you can take refuge. A place inside you, a place to which no one else has access, a place that no one can destroy.
- Crazy CreditsAt the start of the end credits, there is a rotating DNA double helix in the background.
- VerbindungenFeatured in At the Movies: Cannes Film Festival 2011 (2011)
- SoundtracksPor el amor de amar
(Versión Castellana)
Written by Jean Manzon and José Toledo
Performed by / interpretada por CONCHA BUIKA (Buika), al piano Iván González Lewis (as Iván 'Melón' Lewis)
© 1960, by Jean Manzon & Jose Toledo.
Autorizado para todo el mundo a Universal Music Publishing, S.L.
Todos los derechos reservados.
Grabado en CATA (Madrid).
Top-Auswahl
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprachen
- Auch bekannt als
- La piel que habito
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Budget
- 10.002.914 € (geschätzt)
- Bruttoertrag in den USA und Kanada
- 3.185.812 $
- Eröffnungswochenende in den USA und in Kanada
- 223.119 $
- 16. Okt. 2011
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 33.716.389 $
- Laufzeit
- 2 Std.(120 min)
- Farbe
- Sound-Mix
- Seitenverhältnis
- 1.85 : 1