IMDb-BEWERTUNG
4,2/10
10.411
IHRE BEWERTUNG
Eine von der abgebrühten Soldatin Samantha O'Hara angeführte Söldnertruppe bekommt es bei einer Rettungsmission in Afrika sowohl mit schießwütigen Rebellen als auch mit tödlichen Löwen zu tu... Alles lesenEine von der abgebrühten Soldatin Samantha O'Hara angeführte Söldnertruppe bekommt es bei einer Rettungsmission in Afrika sowohl mit schießwütigen Rebellen als auch mit tödlichen Löwen zu tun.Eine von der abgebrühten Soldatin Samantha O'Hara angeführte Söldnertruppe bekommt es bei einer Rettungsmission in Afrika sowohl mit schießwütigen Rebellen als auch mit tödlichen Löwen zu tun.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
- Auszeichnungen
- 1 wins total
Tertius Meintjes
- Gordie
- (as Tertius Meintjies)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
I really didn't like it. It's a total cliché and Megan Fox doesn't convince anyone playing a tough ex military. The special effects are really bad, it lose proportionality between the computer animals and the actors. By the way, the overall acting is really bad.
I didn't think my day would include writing a review regarding this flick. After reading all the negative reviews and comments about it, I figured I'd watch it to see how bad it really was. Well, I must say it wasn't the best movie I've ever watched and nothing I haven't seen before but to say it was a total waste of time, I'd go with no it wasn't. Does it have it's flaws? Absolutely, there are quite a few but it wasn't near as bad as some make it out to be. In the case of the CGI, brutal. Very bad and the story was all over the place. The so called "comedy" fell flat but I thought the action decent and she reloaded. That should be worth a star right there. I've seen worse.
Overall I'd say if you get a chance, watch it for yourself but don't spend your hard earned money on it. I thought it was a decent time waster and would watch it again. I really can't believe I'm actually defending this movie but a 3.8? It's better than that, hell, the Doorman is rated higher and that sucks way more than his one. Just say'n.
Overall I'd say if you get a chance, watch it for yourself but don't spend your hard earned money on it. I thought it was a decent time waster and would watch it again. I really can't believe I'm actually defending this movie but a 3.8? It's better than that, hell, the Doorman is rated higher and that sucks way more than his one. Just say'n.
The title pretty much says it all. She is just there for eye candy and never seems to get dirty in any scene. Poor acting throughout. CGI of lions was low budget yet they are the stars of the movie.
It tries to be non stop action, but the shaky camera and annoying shootouts are poorly done. And lets have a 200'+ cliff drop into a 20' rolling river like no problem.
Well.. 3 stars only for the message this movie gave... stop hunting animals lions, tigers, elephants etc and save their habitat.
Movie sucks otherwise..
Movie sucks otherwise..
"Rogue's" biggest shortcoming is it's indecision as to what its supposed to be.
Is it a "GI Jane" military style of film or perhaps a "The Ghost and the Darkness" deal, about man eating animals? The fact it's not clear about what it wants to be is a big part of the reason, it fails to gel into anything satisfying.
Its character development is weak for this reason too. You never get to know who the main characters are in any detail, as the move between genres leave's little room, for character development.
That's regrettable too, as the cast hand in solid performances. Certainly i have no criticism, on the acting front.
Really, this is what could have been two films, rolled uncomfortably into one. I'll add I'm also a little critical of the way it presents what are increasingly endangered animals, in a less than flattering or for that matter, accurate light.
It tries to smooth this over at the end with a conservationist message but I still don't think personally, this was a path that should have been taken to start with.
4/10 from me.
Is it a "GI Jane" military style of film or perhaps a "The Ghost and the Darkness" deal, about man eating animals? The fact it's not clear about what it wants to be is a big part of the reason, it fails to gel into anything satisfying.
Its character development is weak for this reason too. You never get to know who the main characters are in any detail, as the move between genres leave's little room, for character development.
That's regrettable too, as the cast hand in solid performances. Certainly i have no criticism, on the acting front.
Really, this is what could have been two films, rolled uncomfortably into one. I'll add I'm also a little critical of the way it presents what are increasingly endangered animals, in a less than flattering or for that matter, accurate light.
It tries to smooth this over at the end with a conservationist message but I still don't think personally, this was a path that should have been taken to start with.
4/10 from me.
Wusstest du schon
- WissenswertesWas shot in 22 days.
- PatzerA single RPG will not cause a Blackhawk helicopter to disintegrate like shown in this film.
- Zitate
Samantha O'Hara: If I fucking die because I'm doing the right thing, I'm gonna be so pissed!
- Crazy CreditsDuring the end credits, there is a extract from the director about the realities of real life Lion Farms and the plea for them to be banned
- SoundtracksEverybody (Backstreet's Back)
Written by Denniz Pop (as Dag Volle) and Max Martin
(c) Published by Maratone AB and MXM Music AB
Administered by Kobalt Music Publishing Limited
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Rogue?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsländer
- Offizielle Standorte
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Rogue Hunter
- Drehorte
- Produktionsfirmen
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
Box Office
- Weltweiter Bruttoertrag
- 242.884 $
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 45 Min.(105 min)
- Farbe
- Seitenverhältnis
- 2.39:1
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen