Wall of Chefs

The host is annoying... overall I'm sick of competition shows. What do the wins even mean to anyone anymore? Ohh I won a random episode in a random season on one of 1000 cooking shows on TV.

I have enjoyed watching this competition show. It's, I guess, my opinion that the judging is fair. The Wall of Chefs are Canadian, as are the contestants but at least 1 judge on the wall is familiar with most all cuisines out there. I don't believe that you need to be from nor familiar with Canadian cooking and food prep (this from an American born and bred).

As for unrecognizable chefs; I have seen a very large chunk of these chefs previously. Chef Acheson, Chef Susar Lee, Chef Crawford-just to name a few are known beyond Canada. And although I'd never heard of Chef Rob Gentile prior to watching this show, I know Buca di Beppo and have enjoyed eating at their restaurants several times.

Now, for the review saying they're tired of all the cooking competitions: What in the heck are you doing watching a cooking competition show for then?

I would love for there to be additional seasons. On a few of the competitions I've watched they have returning contestants. I would like to see some of those runner-ups return, the ones that narrowly missed winning the episode. Another possible is some of those that just completely crashed and burned out the gate, to redeem themselves after perhaps growing a little more experience/techniques.

So overall I really enjoyed the Wall of Chefs cooking competition show. I appreciated seeing average home cooks show off their skills in front of some of the most respected chefs around the world and especially in the U. S. However, what was disappointing to watch was the implicit bias towards ethnic cooks (Black, Hispanic, Indian, Asian, etc). More often than not they didn't make it past the second round of cooks NOT because of their lack of ability but primarily because the chefs judging them were for the most part all-white and all-American. There's a certain culture approach to seasonings, style of cooking, presentation and flavor that exists in ethnic communities that just doesn't in 'traditional American cooking'. If renewed for a second season I'd love to see greater chef representation OR greater understanding for ethnic cooks.

In the vein of Masterchef, this show offers a similar premise--home cooks compete in rounds for a cash prize--but in an episodic format, rather than as a serial. So you get the viewer payoff of a weekly winner, but what you lose is any sense of involvement with the contestants, since they change every week. Likewise, there are three rounds per episode, and it all feels rushed. Two would be better. Perhaps the result of Canadian politeness, sometimes the judges (the "wall of chefs") sugar-coat their comments at the expense of specific critique. Even Hugh Acheson laid on the syrup, and he is known for his ascerbic wit, mostly absent here. Viewers looking to learn technique will be disappointed by the pace as well. We see very little actual cooking. Mildly entertaining, this show is in the end less interesting than watching reruns of Masterchef Australia from back in the days when it was had the boys instead of the current crew, who are likeable, but exhibit some of the same tendencies as the judges here.

I feel compelled to address the review that accuses the show of "underwhelming representation." I've only watched one episode, but assuming it is typical I can't imagine why anyone would make such a claim. I won't address it beyond observing that the person who won e01 was judged on creativity and execution, and the decision had neither literally nor figuratively anything at all to do with "seasoning, style of cooking, presentation", etc. The four contestants could not have been more diverse, so much so that in retrospect I wonder whether this was intentional. The chef judges are all quite famous, and the panel is thus what it is. (They are not, as the reviewer claims, mostly "All-American," whatever that means.) But the one advantage having so many judges is that a small panel of judges are assigned to each round, and some attempt is made to coordinate the speciality of the judges with the contestant dishes being presented. Decide for yourself. The show is worth a look, if you don't have anything much better to do.

This show reminds me of Chopped more than Masterchef in that it does the weekly formatting of new contestants each week instead of continuing people each week(not including tournaments.)for many weeks to win at the end.

The show is three rounds, each with a different challenge. There are 12 judges in all. Four judge each round instead of the same small group each round so you dont know who will be in each round until the end of each round, which spices up not being able to plan ahead if you know what particular judges like. Four competitors start with one leaving each round.

Round one is make your crowd pleaser. Basically it is a dish everyone likes with not restrictions. A good way to ease into the compitition. Use whatever you want to make any dish you think people you like.

Round two is called Chefs Fridge, which is the shows variation of the Chopped baskets. It is three ingredients that one chef who will judge that round will always have in their fridge. All three must be used to make a dish. My only worry for this round is that if they ever use the same chef in future seasons that they dont reuse the same ingredients to make it predictable.

Round Three is called Restaurant Worthy. One of the chefs, who will judge that round, shows a dish. Then the last two competitors must make their version of that dish. For example one shows a mac and cheese and the competitors must make their version of mac and cheese, though one chef had a risotto and the two left had to make their best rice dish so not always obvious what they need to make.

This show is based in Canada, so i was only able to see it on Hulu. The judges are all well known Canadian chefs, and if you have watched Chopped Canada, you might recognize some of them.

Overall I think this show takes the Chopped style format and expands it. Different judges each round, three different style rounds. The host seems right in that he doesn't overshadow the judges and is like Ted Allen on Chopped compared to Alton Brown on Iron Chef America, who i felt more the face of the show than the chairman and judges. And no particular judge seems to be above the others not including the i guess main judge each round, the first one called or the one for the last two rounds for their challenge, to be the speaker at the end of each round.

If i had anything bad to say it isn't much. You usually can tell(only on episode 8 of 20, so not sure if it changes) who is safe when they call your name each round or if you win in the final round. No surprise factor there. And feels like even if different rounds, stuff i have seen before.

This to me is a really good show where I hope they keep it going.