Füge eine Handlung in deiner Sprache hinzuAn allegory of the life of a believer on a journey from the City of Destruction to the Celestial City.An allegory of the life of a believer on a journey from the City of Destruction to the Celestial City.An allegory of the life of a believer on a journey from the City of Destruction to the Celestial City.
- Regie
- Drehbuch
- Hauptbesetzung
Fotos
MaryBeth Hampton
- Christiana
- (as Mary Beth Hampton)
Mark Anderson Phillips
- Adam the First
- (as Mark Phillips)
Empfohlene Bewertungen
The book "Pilgrim's Progress" was first printed in the late 1600's and has been published ever since. That in itself tells you a lot about it's value as perceived by multitudes throughout the ages. Paul Bunyan, the author of the book this movie is based on, could be considered a modern day Martin Luther. The 1979 version is rated by IMDb even lower than this one. It's true the graphics are far from "Star Wars" or "Avatar" but the content for believers is encouraging and strengthening. I have not shared this movie with anyone who has not appreciated the depth of life's struggle, value of life and an understanding that we will all stand before God. I find the 1979 version more comprehensive and truer to form. Look this title up for a lot more detail. One of the best family movies I have seen over and over again.
Paul Bunyan's Pilgrim's Progress is a masterpiece not only Christian literature, but of the English language. It's allegorical format coupled with a plethora of Bible quotes make it a powerful tool for the conviction of sin, the warning of the wrath of God, the grace He cleanses our sin away with, and the need to "run as though to win the prize". A truly awesome and inspired book.
This movie, however, does a poor service to that classic. As I have said of other Christian films, one does not expect or even desire big budget extravagance. But one does expect a producer to find good Christian actors and finance a good script. Pilgrim's Progress the book is written like a play, so one would think the script would be a piece of cake, right? Wrong! Someone somewhere must have looked at the book and said, "Duh...this prose is too hard to understand. People won't get it. Let's slang it up with today's talk! Uh...yeah...huh huh!" It amounts to a rape of the book. Producers, people are not stupid. They can "get it" if you give the old English prose a chance. Another better option would have been to completely re- modify the book setting and place it totally in modern surroundings, instead of this hybrid treatment we got here. Go totally like the book, or go totally modern, don't go in-between.
The acting, while not the worst I have seen, leaves much to be desired. It is all surface. The tears flow on the surface but communicate nothing of the personal struggles within. The vocal work is flat. There is no gesture and posture work that makes anyone distinctive. The characters all melt together, not leaving you remembering anyone clearly. In a word, it doesn't ring true.
The special effects and music, while not so important to me, are negligible.
There is one good result of my seeing this film. It made me want to read the book and relish John Bunyan's God inspired genius. And to think he was basically an uneducated man when he wrote this! Me thinkst our English is getting more and more simplified and dumbed down at the passing of every generation.
This movie, however, does a poor service to that classic. As I have said of other Christian films, one does not expect or even desire big budget extravagance. But one does expect a producer to find good Christian actors and finance a good script. Pilgrim's Progress the book is written like a play, so one would think the script would be a piece of cake, right? Wrong! Someone somewhere must have looked at the book and said, "Duh...this prose is too hard to understand. People won't get it. Let's slang it up with today's talk! Uh...yeah...huh huh!" It amounts to a rape of the book. Producers, people are not stupid. They can "get it" if you give the old English prose a chance. Another better option would have been to completely re- modify the book setting and place it totally in modern surroundings, instead of this hybrid treatment we got here. Go totally like the book, or go totally modern, don't go in-between.
The acting, while not the worst I have seen, leaves much to be desired. It is all surface. The tears flow on the surface but communicate nothing of the personal struggles within. The vocal work is flat. There is no gesture and posture work that makes anyone distinctive. The characters all melt together, not leaving you remembering anyone clearly. In a word, it doesn't ring true.
The special effects and music, while not so important to me, are negligible.
There is one good result of my seeing this film. It made me want to read the book and relish John Bunyan's God inspired genius. And to think he was basically an uneducated man when he wrote this! Me thinkst our English is getting more and more simplified and dumbed down at the passing of every generation.
The concept for this adaptation, namely re-imagining "The Pilgrim's Progress" in a contemporary setting, is intriguing and has the potential to be a good film. What was presumably the movie's selling point is actually its main weakness.
This isn't so much a modern pilgrim's progress, it's a modern pilgrim in a medieval/fantasy setting. If they had excelled in every other area of production I might cut them some slack but they simply did not compensate. So, how did they fail to execute the concept?
For one thing, clothing. I'm not sure which 21st century these people live in but no one in the 21st century that I live in and that I know go walking through the woods in dress khakis and a button down dress shirt, albeit un-tucked. Visuals, including wardrobe, are important aspects of any movie but especially here. If the point is "It's a modern pilgrim's progress" then the visuals have to tell me this. You can get a cheap pair of blue jeans at Wal- Mart for nine bucks. The budget was clearly not the issue, but a simple lack of thinking things through.
Another area is the awkward and failed attempt at blending modern and medieval. Go all the way- make the world of the journey match the character.
There are other complaints I have, but that's my main one. I'm still waiting for a good cinematic version of Bunyan's famous story.
This isn't so much a modern pilgrim's progress, it's a modern pilgrim in a medieval/fantasy setting. If they had excelled in every other area of production I might cut them some slack but they simply did not compensate. So, how did they fail to execute the concept?
For one thing, clothing. I'm not sure which 21st century these people live in but no one in the 21st century that I live in and that I know go walking through the woods in dress khakis and a button down dress shirt, albeit un-tucked. Visuals, including wardrobe, are important aspects of any movie but especially here. If the point is "It's a modern pilgrim's progress" then the visuals have to tell me this. You can get a cheap pair of blue jeans at Wal- Mart for nine bucks. The budget was clearly not the issue, but a simple lack of thinking things through.
Another area is the awkward and failed attempt at blending modern and medieval. Go all the way- make the world of the journey match the character.
There are other complaints I have, but that's my main one. I'm still waiting for a good cinematic version of Bunyan's famous story.
I read Pilgrims Progress when I gave my heart to Jesus 16 years ago. It helped me understand so many things at the time. Recently I came across the DVD in the Christian Bookstore and purchased it this evening. I just finished watching it and though it isn't the quality of a multi million dollar movie I felt it was well done with the telling of the story and the examples given. It has brought me closer to Jesus this evening. I suppose the person watching will see what the heart is willing to see or what they allow Jesus to show them through this movie. May God bless everyone who watches Pilgrims Progress. Thank you for making it!
I had read the book prior to watching this movie, so I had an idea of what to expect coming into this. Considering Bunyon wrote this in the 1600s, trying to write a screenplay so that today's society can follow can be a bit daunting. Even the Left Behind series would run parallel with this in how it was made; I liked both! While I also recognize that this is a low budget film, we (moviegoers) have been spoiled with the progress in cinematic technology and expect everything to be along the lines of LOTR, NARNIA, MATRIX, and such movies. Some would call this a cheesy, poorly made movie... I say this was well done, and I'm thoroughly satisfied with purchasing this DVD and look forward to sharing it with others. It still conveyed Bunyon's and, more importantly, God's message.
In peace, with hope through Christ...
In peace, with hope through Christ...
Wusstest du schon
- VerbindungenVersion of Il pellegrino (1912)
Top-Auswahl
Melde dich zum Bewerten an und greife auf die Watchlist für personalisierte Empfehlungen zu.
- How long is Pilgrim's Progress?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Erscheinungsdatum
- Herkunftsland
- Offizieller Standort
- Sprache
- Auch bekannt als
- Pilgrims Progress: Journey to Heaven
- Drehorte
- Lynchburg, Virginia, USA(Primary city of filming)
- Produktionsfirma
- Weitere beteiligte Unternehmen bei IMDbPro anzeigen
- Laufzeit
- 1 Std. 45 Min.(105 min)
- Farbe
Zu dieser Seite beitragen
Bearbeitung vorschlagen oder fehlenden Inhalt hinzufügen